|
|
 |
|

18th August 2002, 07:39 AM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Apr 2001
Location: Zaragoza, España
|
|
Posts: 5
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 36 Karma: 10 
|
|
Process Capacity and Over Adjustment - Definitions
Hi!
I need some good definitions for "process capacity" and "overadjustment".
Thank you in advance.
FG
|

18th August 2002, 12:06 PM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
|
|
Posts: 1,643
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 63 Times in 44 Posts
Karma Power: 80
|
|
Felix
I have not heard the term 'process capacity', do you mean 'process capability' ?
'Overadjustment' could be defined as adjusting a process to correct an 'out of specification' reading such that the process is then 'out of specification' at the other end of the specification range. i.e. if I am turning down a diameter on a shaft, and I monitor my process my measuring the shaft od I might measure 9.5mm against a spec of 10mm +/- 0.1mm and therefore adjust my machine offsets such that the next piece produced is 10.5mm - again out of spec.
This can occur more subtely where a decision is taken to adjust a process based on a process reading that is actually indicative of the capability of the process, and doesnt actually require the process to be adjusted. Correct use of run charts should eliminate such problems.
|

18th August 2002, 03:32 PM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Apr 2001
Location: Zaragoza, España
|
|
Posts: 5
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 36 Karma: 10 
|
|
M Greenaway,
Thanks for your reply. You are right, I mean 'process capability'.
¿Any definition?...
Felix
|

18th August 2002, 04:14 PM
|
 |
Forum Administrator
Registration Date: Mar 2000
Location: Pune, India
Age: 47
|
|
Posts: 1,073
Thanks Given to Others: 83
Thanked 84 Times in 55 Posts
Karma Power: 90
|
|
__________________
You are never given a wish without also being given the power to make it true. You may have to work for it, however. ~Richard Bach
|

19th August 2002, 05:14 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
|
|
Posts: 1,643
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 63 Times in 44 Posts
Karma Power: 80
|
|
Jim
Yes, this statement is so wooly I am sure it will be poorly implemented. I think it should be a statistical measure of process capability - this is what I believe is key to the 'process approach' loosely defined in ISO9001, i.e. not drawing pretty pictures of process models, but understanding process performance, variation and causes of variation, and utilising statistical methods for this.
Just my opinion though......
|

19th August 2002, 10:15 AM
|
 |
Where's the shall?
Registration Date: Jul 2001
Location: Plymouth, MI
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 2,202
Thanks Given to Others: 208
Thanked 166 Times in 128 Posts
Karma Power: 129
|
|
Process Capability
Quote:
|
When in 8..2.3, ISO 9001 talks about demonstrating "the ability of the processes to achieve planned results" is it talking, do you think, of process capability as commonly understood?
|
Living in the shadow of the B3, this has always seemed to mean CpK and such. However, not all processes are suitable for this type of study. TS, goes as far as calling them “process studies” (8.2.3.1) which supports CpKs. On an ISO system, as you say Jim we need to think beyond process capability studies. The key, IMNSHO is to determine if your processes meet plans. Also, don’t just think production…consider all your processes that can affect customer satisfaction.
__________________
Dave B (the other Dave)
|

19th August 2002, 10:20 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
|
|
Posts: 1,643
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 63 Times in 44 Posts
Karma Power: 80
|
|
db
What sorts of processes would not be suitable for such a study ??
|

19th August 2002, 10:55 AM
|
 |
Registration Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 67
|
|
Posts: 1,437
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 90
|
|
MG,
Processes that require only visual inspection as a means of acceptance.
__________________
Sam Goody
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|