Elsmar Cove Quality and Medical Device Discussions

The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > National and International Business System Standards > Food and Drug (Pharmaceuticals) related Regulations > Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11)
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

FDA Audit Documentation - Recently released FDA Warning Letter


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links



Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

Atul's
Quality Forum Online

Howard's
International Quality Services

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum

Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Related Topic Tags
21 cfr part 211 - finished pharmaceuticals cgmp, 21 cfr part 820 - med. device mfger. qsr requirements, fda (food and drug administration), fda requirements, required documents, required procedures, required processes, required records
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 14th December 2011, 12:01 PM
alex.Kennedy

 
 
Total Posts: 53
Caution FDA Audit Documentation - Recently released FDA Warning Letter

A recently released FDA Warning Letter portrays a tighter interpretation of 21 CFR part 820.50, in so much as they expect to be able to review documented record for items a) to d) below. It must also be understood that other branches of the FDA (Drugs & Bio) have ascertained that when 21 CFR 211 lacks detail; they will audit to detail in 21 CFR 820 (if any).

Although the wording used in a) & b) would definitely identify them as applicable to medical devices parts; c) & d) are not. Also the fact that they mention in b) & c); that these requirements are applicable to - contractors and services rendered. This for many companies will be very disconcerting.

Extract from warning letter:

a) Your firm has not documented the evaluation and approval of suppliers of components used in the manufacture or assembly of the xxxxx xxx xxxx measurement device.

b) Your firm does not have a documented agreement with any component suppliers or contractors to notify it of changes made in the components supplied or services rendered.

c) Your firm has not established the requirements that must be met by suppliers and contractors.

d) Your firm does not maintain an approved suppliers list.
Precise extraction from WL CMS Case #175552

Alex Kennedy
Thank You to alex.Kennedy for your informative Post and/or Attachment!

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 14th December 2011, 12:42 PM
MIREGMGR

 
 
Total Posts: 3,685
Re: FDA Audit Documentation

Our understanding since 1996, at least in regard to matters that might be subject to FDA inspection, has been "if it's not documented, it didn't happen".
Thanks to MIREGMGR for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 14th December 2011, 01:33 PM
sagai

 
 
Total Posts: 1,094
Re: FDA Audit Documentation - Recently released FDA Warning Letter

Thank you Alex for sharing, it is really a good way to collect impressions and thoughts!
Regards, Szabolcs
  Post Number #4  
Old 14th December 2011, 01:35 PM
sagai

 
 
Total Posts: 1,094
Re: FDA Audit Documentation

what is the minimal criteria for "documented"?
  Post Number #5  
Old 14th December 2011, 03:47 PM
Wes Bucey's Avatar
Wes Bucey

 
 
Total Posts: 11,036
Re: FDA Audit Documentation

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by MIREGMGR View Post

Our understanding since 1996, at least in regard to matters that might be subject to FDA inspection, has been "if it's not documented, it didn't happen".
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by sagai View Post

what is the minimal criteria for "documented"?
In my mind [and practice], "documentation" means you have
  1. a written plan for an activity
  2. a record (hard copy or electronic) of the activity being performed
  3. periodic evaluation (recorded) of the activity record to compare against the plan (audit and management review?)
  4. record of the action or non action taken after the evaluation (this presupposes management makes due and timely communication to concerned parties, including regulators)
  Post Number #6  
Old 14th December 2011, 11:59 PM
Ronen E

 
 
Total Posts: 2,726
Re: FDA Audit Documentation - Recently released FDA Warning Letter

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by alex.Kennedy View Post

A recently released FDA Warning Letter portrays a tighter interpretation of 21 CFR part 820.50, in so much as they expect to be able to review documented record for items a) to d) below. It must also be understood that other branches of the FDA (Drugs & Bio) have ascertained that when 21 CFR 211 lacks detail; they will audit to detail in 21 CFR 820 (if any).

Although the wording used in a) & b) would definitely identify them as applicable to medical devices parts; c) & d) are not. Also the fact that they mention in b) & c); that these requirements are applicable to - contractors and services rendered. This for many companies will be very disconcerting.

Extract from warning letter:

a) Your firm has not documented the evaluation and approval of suppliers of components used in the manufacture or assembly of the xxxxx xxx xxxx measurement device.

b) Your firm does not have a documented agreement with any component suppliers or contractors to notify it of changes made in the components supplied or services rendered.

c) Your firm has not established the requirements that must be met by suppliers and contractors.

d) Your firm does not maintain an approved suppliers list.
Precise extraction from WL CMS Case #175552

Alex Kennedy
validation online
Thanks for highlighting the subject; however, I think this is old news to any manufacturer following the FDA's QSR manual and/or ISO 13485.

Cheers,
Ronen.
  Post Number #7  
Old 16th December 2011, 09:50 AM
alex.Kennedy

 
 
Total Posts: 53
Re: FDA Audit Documentation - Recently released FDA Warning Letter

I appreciate the comments made by forum readers and I do agree that the universal understanding with regulators was if it was not document; it was not being done and probably never had been done.


The subtlety I was trying to highlight is that in one simple interpretation they are saying ‘audit all your suppliers’. In the past we have used all sorts of risk assessments to define which software suppliers require to be audited and which do not. Now it would appear that the terms mentioned in this interpretation; that contractors and suppliers must be made aware of the precise skills competency and resources that are required of them and that contract givers must have documented evidence that these requirements are within the suppliers capabilities; requires the contract giver to carry out some form of audit in order to establish the requisite documented evidence. How else can you officially approve a supplier.


Alex Kennedy

Last edited by Stijloor; 16th December 2011 at 10:03 AM.
  Post Number #8  
Old 16th December 2011, 10:57 AM
Wes Bucey's Avatar
Wes Bucey

 
 
Total Posts: 11,036
Re: FDA Audit Documentation - Recently released FDA Warning Letter

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by alex.Kennedy View Post

I appreciate the comments made by forum readers and I do agree that the universal understanding with regulators was if it was not document; it was not being done and probably never had been done.


The subtlety I was trying to highlight is that in one simple interpretation they are saying ‘audit all your suppliers’. In the past we have used all sorts of risk assessments to define which software suppliers require to be audited and which do not. Now it would appear that the terms mentioned in this interpretation; that contractors and suppliers must be made aware of the precise skills competency and resources that are required of them and that contract givers must have documented evidence that these requirements are within the suppliers capabilities; requires the contract giver to carry out some form of audit in order to establish the requisite documented evidence. How else can you officially approve a supplier.


Alex Kennedy
Every supplier does not require the same level or intensity of audit. The point should be that management PLANS which level of supplier gets what level of audit and then DOCUMENTS that the audit has been conducted at that level and that any and all issues arising from the audit are resolved.
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > National and International Business System Standards > Food and Drug (Pharmaceuticals) related Regulations > Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11)

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Most Poorly Written FDA Warning Letter Ever? HPLC_Help 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5 7th August 2014 02:58 AM
FDA 483 Warning Letter for use of Calipers jdm2008 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 18 10th July 2014 07:00 PM
FDA Form 483 Warning Letter - What next? tallu US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 7 6th March 2014 01:56 PM
How long does it take US FDA to issue a Warning Letter Close Out Letter Arnthor Other US Medical Device Regulations 1 6th April 2011 03:13 AM
How to Respond to a US FDA untitled letter - Form 483 or Warning Letter Ethan Loh Other US Medical Device Regulations 2 23rd December 2010 10:32 PM



The time now is 10:23 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"

Elsmar Cove Quality and Medical Device Discussions