The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 6th January 1999, 11:11 AM
clark
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default Quality records; PO's - Life of part + 1 Year

We are a supplier of paints and coatings which makes us a batch process industry related supplier.

We are QS9000 registered, but we are trying to make efficient sense of the requirement to store PO's for the life of the active part plus one calender year.

Our registrar interprets the requirement to mean as long as orders come in , it is active. When orders cease, one year later you purge your PO files.

Our question is basic - how do you store and archive the PO's for a variety of raw materials, which are then used in a variety of formulations for a number of different customers, and have individual records that are unique and easily disposable when the formualation is no longer active?

Any and all opinions and ideas are welcomed.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 11th January 1999, 01:13 AM
Lyndon Diong
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

I am not familar with your processes but I think traceability can be maintained if you record the batch/lot number of the raw materials used for each formulation. The P.O. should also contain the batch no..
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 11th January 1999, 07:07 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11559
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Default

Clark:

No chance of a software solution?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11th January 1999, 09:36 PM
clark
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

Software was one approach we have taken with system backups, but not all of the documents are on the system IE Customer PO's etc.

A.) The larger issue still is unanswered - when a customer says a part is no longer active, how are we supposed to destroy the records when the raw materials for the deactivated part are still active for other parts.

B.) The blanket PO often contains 5 - 15 different part numbers per PO. How are we to retain records for each part active or de-active?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12th January 1999, 01:22 AM
Lyndon Diong
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

QS9000 says" ...maintained for the length of time that the part is active for production and service requirements...". My interpretation of active for production is with respect to the PO. Let's say the PO requires 200 gallons of black paint. Once the 200 gallons is shipped out to your customer, the part is no longer in active production. I do not think paint needs servicing. Hence the records should be kept for one year after the product is out from your company. I treat each PO independently.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12th January 1999, 01:42 AM
clark
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

I agree there is traceability, but my greatest concern is the amount of paperwork that will be required to maintain that traceability to the hard copy PO , and for the life of the part - no less.

I can envision boxes and boxes of records that may never become deactivated by my customer.

In addition to PPAP records both Raw Materials and Customer Purchase orders are to be maintained for the life of the active part plus one calender year.

Thanks Chuck
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12th January 1999, 09:37 AM
clark
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

The interpretation of QS9000 is found in the glossary, and has a customer focus: see page 123 of QS9000 version 3.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 13th January 1999, 01:34 AM
Lyndon Diong
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

Let's say a company is producing bolts and nuts. Some of those products were produced since 30 years ago. The company will have to keep POs for a long, long time. Anyway some customers will not know when they will order the same parts again or if they ever will. I am not sure what information in the PO is so useful that it had to be kept for more than a couple of years. Just curious; is there a statue-barred period for PO?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
When do you need to control records? Purchase Orders Libnani ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 2 6th October 2008 07:24 AM
Objective Evidence & Verbal Purchase Orders (PO's) Jaxter ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 3 24th October 2007 11:44 AM
Record Retention Time of Part Life + 1 Year Hoeyster Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 7 12th July 2007 06:50 PM
PO's & EDI, for the life of the part LaurieB Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1 8th April 1999 01:06 PM
4.16 Quality Records - Retention - Customer Purchase Orders (POs) LaurieB Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 2 28th January 1999 11:41 PM



The time now is 02:19 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts