The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc.


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12th September 2002, 04:46 PM
Dura_guy Dura_guy is offline
Shy Poster (1 to 5 Posts)

Registration Date: Sep 2002
Location: Iowa
Age: 38
 
Posts: 1
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 30
Karma: 10
Dura_guy has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question Reducing gaging frequency/High Cpk

I have a few processes that are extremely capable (> 7.0 Cpk). In QS-9000 4.9.2, reference is made to revising the control plan when a high degree of capability is demonstrated. Is there any guidelines as to how this can be accomplished, (other that atmospheric analysis?)

Currently we are gaging for these characteristics at a frequency of 3 pcs. per hour of production. Is there a formula I can apply that can help me determine if I can reduce the frequency of checks to every 2,3,4....etc. hours?

Thanks for your help!

Dura guy
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 13th September 2002, 11:38 AM
noboxwine's Avatar
noboxwine noboxwine is offline
Send Martini's !!!!!!!

Registration Date: Feb 2002
Location: Wine Country, NY
Age: 38
 
Posts: 201
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts
Karma Power: 42
Karma: 317
noboxwine is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.noboxwine is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.noboxwine is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.noboxwine is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.
BIG Smile Almost Miller Time

7.0 Cpk ! Wow ! I am sure that there is some esoteric, mathematical formula that can be used as a guideline for adjusting your frequency. But, here's what I have done in similar situations. First, is your process in CONTROL? I can show you a high Cpk all day long, but if the process is not in statistical control, then you can't predict it. If it is, I would simply use common sense (sorry, I tend to throw that in and confuse a lot of people) and change your freqeuncy to, say, every 1.5 hrs and monitor accordingly. If it's still good, 2 hrs. Simply let the data tell you how your process is behaving and reduce needless inspection accordingly. I am sure you'll find it pretty simple and effective. Rot's of ruck and have a nice day.
__________________
Operator Error cannot be the Root Cause. Oh, unless you're a Pilot.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 13th September 2002, 12:51 PM
Mike S. Mike S. is offline
An Early 'Cover'

Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Coast US
 
Posts: 1,773
Thanks Given to Others: 24
Thanked 51 Times in 39 Posts
Karma Power: 103
Karma: 1849
Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

I agree with Noboxwine, but if you want a non-esoteric mathematical formula, one "guideline" I've used is 6 measurements between adjustments to the process. This won't work everywhere, but try noboxwine's idea and see if it would jive at all with mine.

Let us know how it works out. Maybe we'll all learn somethin'
__________________
Mike S. ("Gun Nut")
And they ask me why I drink....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13th September 2002, 02:25 PM
D.Scott's Avatar
D.Scott D.Scott is offline
Super Moderator

Registration Date: Feb 2001
Location: Wellington, OH USA
Age: 69
 
Posts: 1,604
Thanks Given to Others: 80
Thanked 289 Times in 172 Posts
Karma Power: 149
Karma: 4082
D.Scott is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
D.Scott is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.D.Scott is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.D.Scott is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.D.Scott is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.D.Scott is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.D.Scott is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.D.Scott is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.D.Scott is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via Yahoo to D.Scott
Default

I am certainly in agreement with the comments so far but remember that a change in the control plan should be run past the customer. Also, if you just open up your intervals, you stand the chance of going past the optimum before you realize it.

Why not take the control chart you currently have and do run studies based on that data. Calculate using every other entry for 2 hours, every 3rd for 3 hour etc. This will show what the capability will look like at those intervals. Include the studies with an analysis of the data and present the facts to the customer telling him you intend to change the intervals on the control plan.

When he agrees, make your change. This way, the data is still there and current in case you run into a problem. It is also less confusing to the employees who are collecting the data.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13th September 2002, 03:02 PM
Mike S. Mike S. is offline
An Early 'Cover'

Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Coast US
 
Posts: 1,773
Thanks Given to Others: 24
Thanked 51 Times in 39 Posts
Karma Power: 103
Karma: 1849
Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Thumbs up Great idea.

Sage advice. Wish I'da said it first.

And Energy said common sense was dead! Not completely it ain't!
__________________
Mike S. ("Gun Nut")
And they ask me why I drink....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc.

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Can Inspection Frequency be based on Cp or Cpk? masterx Inspection and Test, Sampling and Related Topics 11 15th March 2009 01:59 PM
GMDN Codes for 'High Frequency Radiosurgical systems' vinqua ISO 13485 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems 3 16th April 2008 05:58 AM
Students Find High Frequency Ring Tone Adults Can't Hear Marc General News and Business Articles 18 13th June 2006 10:28 PM
Tensile made critical characteristic, but Cpk? High rate of rejection in a part Salman Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 9 25th May 2006 08:45 PM
Combining high Cpk (3, 4 or 5) with a set of XR charts margherita Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 4 3rd November 1999 09:50 PM



The time now is 12:34 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts