The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Design and Development - Process and Product


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 8th October 2002, 12:22 PM
ron
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question TS 16949 design responsibility

I work for a Japanese owned company in the U.S. We are currently QS 9000/ISO9002 certified. We are looking at TS 16949
certification now and I would like to know if we need to have our mother company be certified to this standard before we can become certified. Our mother company is responsible for design on many of the parts we produce.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 8th October 2002, 12:56 PM
tomvehoski tomvehoski is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: May 2001
Location: Warren, MI
 
Posts: 548
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Karma Power: 67
Karma: 1119
tomvehoski is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.tomvehoski is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.tomvehoski is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.tomvehoski is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.tomvehoski is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.tomvehoski is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.tomvehoski is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.tomvehoski is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.tomvehoski is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.
Default

It does not matter who is responsible for the designs you produce and their certification status. You are still able to get ISO/TS 16949. Just claim an exemption against design (7.3) if you don't do any design work.

Tom
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 8th October 2002, 01:23 PM
rui12524 rui12524 is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portugal
 
Posts: 22
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 10
rui12524 has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Quote:
tomvehoski said:

It does not matter who is responsible for the designs you produce and their certification status. You are still able to get ISO/TS 16949. Just claim an exemption against design (7.3) if you don't do any design work.

Tom
OK, you don´t have product design responsability, but what about PROCESS desigs responsability?? In TS, you can´t exclude manufactoring process design (see1.2)

Regards
RC
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 8th October 2002, 01:33 PM
ron
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default process design

The designing of the process is for the most part done in Japan as well. We basically receive the equipment, install it, put checks and controls in place and produce the parts. Would this make us process design responsible?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10th October 2002, 11:37 PM
Manoj Mathur Manoj Mathur is offline
Forum Moderator

Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: Silvassa,Near Mumbai in INDIA
Age: 43
 
Posts: 316
Thanks Given to Others: 5
Thanked 43 Times in 10 Posts
Karma Power: 50
Karma: 658
Manoj Mathur is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Manoj Mathur is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Manoj Mathur is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Manoj Mathur is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Manoj Mathur is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Manoj Mathur is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.
Default

Process design is definately was as well as is not a thing which could be excluded in either 9K2K or QS 9000 or TS 16949.
This you need to do in any case.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11th October 2002, 09:34 AM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline

Registration Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 67
 
Posts: 1,437
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 90
Karma: 1020
Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Default

Ron,
If you are seeking certification to TS then you need to be able to demonstrate capability to conform to all of the requirements.
Remote support facilities are included in the initial and surveillance audits.
You can refer to the certification scheme for TS and discuss with your CB.
__________________
Sam Goody
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Design and Development - Process and Product

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Remote Location - Design Responsibility - TS 16949 Certification - Join the debate ganesh_nc Design and Development - Process and Product 14 17th September 2007 12:28 AM
Confusion regarding design responsibility - What can arguably be excluded? dmackey Design and Development - Process and Product 10 30th May 2006 11:59 PM
Design and development skills - No responsibility for product design and development shahshahani Design and Development - Process and Product 3 12th May 2006 04:20 PM
7.3 Design And Development - Revising old QAM to TS16949 - No design responsibility peteroldfield1971 Design and Development - Process and Product 3 8th April 2005 10:04 AM
ISO 9001 Clause 4.4 - We don't have design responsibility Quality Diva Design and Development - Process and Product 5 10th January 2001 04:00 PM



The time now is 10:02 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts