|
|

24th March 1999, 10:29 PM
|
|
|
Audit Findings: The quality objectives have not been quantified
in a recent audit, an NCR was raised as follows:
"the quality objectives have not been quantified".
is it correct?
the standard prescribes that we should bring out the policy with clear objectives and goals etc.
comments please.
|

30th March 1999, 09:50 AM
|
|
|
Madhavan,
re; "the quality objectives have not been quantified".
The standard does not require that the quality objectives be quantified. We have to 'define and document...objectives for quality..'. Where it is appropriate, we should quantify quality objectives, eg; if our policy was to ship only product of a measured and recorded DPM, then it would be a pointless excercise if we did not quantify a threshold under which we would not ship. If my policy is to use 'competent' sub-contractors, then I need to define, and in some way 'quantify' the required performance.
However, if my policy is to varnish my product because I think it is more popular with my customers, then I don't quantify it. I may back up the decision with statistical evidence, but that is not quantifing my objective (which is varnishing). It is quantifying the decision making material.
rgds, John C
|

30th March 1999, 12:26 PM
|
 |
dWizard
Registration Date: Nov 1998
Location: Tullahoma, TN
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 475
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Karma Power: 63
|
|
Quote:
|
The standard does not require that the quality objectives be quantified. We have to 'define and document...objectives for quality..'.
|
Absolutely and well said also. Your examples are good as well.
Regards,
Don
------------------
Check Out dWizard's Lair www.ficom.net/members/donwinton/home.html
|

8th April 1999, 01:08 AM
|
|
|
In fact, as a suggestion, my client was asked to change one of the objectives by incorporating " after implementing QMS and getting it certified, the product will be certified within 12 months as per relevant National Standards".
this sort of inclusions is puzzling.
any comment?
|

8th April 1999, 12:00 PM
|
 |
One of THE Original Covers!
Registration Date: Nov 1998
Location: Wallingford, CT USA
Age: 43
|
|
Posts: 1,158
Thanks Given to Others: 22
Thanked 63 Times in 43 Posts
Karma Power: 94
|
|
Madhavan,
It puzzles me as well. I'm getting the picture that you had an auditor with personal bias performing the audit. His request seems inappropriate to me. National Standards that are mandated (not voluntary), to the best of my knowledge, are established by the government, not Registrar's or their auditors.
Regards,
Kevin
|

8th April 1999, 03:00 PM
|
 |
dWizard
Registration Date: Nov 1998
Location: Tullahoma, TN
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 475
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Karma Power: 63
|
|
Quote:
|
His request seems inappropriate to me.
|
Gotta go with Kevin on this one. Assessors are not supposed to suggest anything! The primary function of an assessor is to determine compliance or nonconpliance to the standard. If I were the client, I would complain (loudly) to his registrar.
Regards,
Don
------------------
Check Out dWizard's Lair www.ficom.net/members/donwinton/home.html
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|