The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Aerospace and Aviation Requirements > AS9100 Aerospace Standard and Requirements


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 7th November 2002, 08:32 PM
M Wombat
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question AS9100 and the VERY small business

I have a very small manufacturing company that designs and produces critical parts for aerospace. I must be AS9100 compliant in a short time. Everyone wears many hats here. We bought this company shortly after it emerged from bankruptcy many years ago. The cause was "too many chiefs" and too much paperwork. I can't let that happen again.
How can I find out what the MINIMUM is for records and documentation? Why do we need to have and document so many "meetings" when there are only 3 people in management that do all the engineering, purchasing, non-conf analysis, planning, etc.? I cannot see how all this new documentation is going to improve our quality! Our failure/discrepancy rate is almost nil now!
Any input? Anyone?
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 8th November 2002, 04:46 AM
Claes Gefvenberg's Avatar
Claes Gefvenberg Claes Gefvenberg is offline
Forum Administrator

Registration Date: May 2000
Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
Age: 49
 
Posts: 3,771
Thanks Given to Others: 246
Thanked 244 Times in 172 Posts
Blog Entries: 13
Karma Power: 213
Karma: 4951
Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Lightbulb

Hi there, and welcome to the Cove.

First of all, I must admit that my knowledge of AS 9100 is next to nil... Ok, it is nil...

In ISO9001, however there is a clause (4.2.1, note 2) that says:

The extent of the qualitymanagement system documentation can differ from one organization to another due to

a) the size of organization and type of activities,
b) the complexity of processes and their interactions, and
c) the competence of personnel.


That allows some leeway for small organisations. Hopefully you can find something similar in AS9100...

/Claes

P.s. I also took the liberty to redirect your post to the AS9100 forum. Hopefully, that will provide you with more and better answers.
__________________
Hanlon's Razor.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
User Groups: Elsmar Cove Cycling Enthusiasts Formula 1 fanatics Photo freaks Readers Corner
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 12th November 2002, 09:39 AM
BadgerMan's Avatar
BadgerMan BadgerMan is offline
Moderator

Registration Date: Feb 2001
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Age: 48
 
Posts: 485
Thanks Given to Others: 36
Thanked 73 Times in 64 Posts
Karma Power: 64
Karma: 979
BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Default

AS 9100a contains the same note under 4.2.1. Section 4.2 of the standard will tell you pretty much all you need to know and it appears to be pretty flexible to allow for operations of different size and complexity.

If you interpret the AS 9100a standard literally, you will find that it requires a quality manual and only five “documented procedures”. Since we (my company) have not been through an AS 9100 rev A audit yet, I am not sure how our registrar will interpret the standard. I reality, we have quite a few “documented procedures”……..probably too many! The standard requires procedures in the following areas:

4.2.3, Control of Documents
4.2.4, Control of Records
8.3, Control of Nonconforming Product
8.5.2, Corrective Action
8.5.3, Preventive Action

Work instructions are the “meat” of the quality system but they can take many different forms (keep this in mind and be creative). The number and type will depend on the size and complexity of the organization.

As for records, they are the evidence that you are doing what your quality system documents say you will do. Again, the amount depends on the size and complexity of you operation.

I think it is critical that your chosen registrar understands your operation. Shop around for a registrar/auditor who has experience with smaller facilities/operations.

Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14th November 2002, 04:07 PM
Raptorwild's Avatar
Raptorwild Raptorwild is offline
$ Contributor

Registration Date: Nov 2002
Location: Arizona
Age: 45
 
Posts: 128
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Karma Power: 37
Karma: 317
Raptorwild is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.Raptorwild is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.Raptorwild is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.Raptorwild is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.
Send a message via Yahoo to Raptorwild
Lightbulb AS9100 and the very small business

I also work for a very small company a total of 6 people. We are ISO 9001 reg. and AS9100 compliant. We are going for another compliance audit this month. In the next year I plan on getting rid of all 20 procedures, revamping them into processes and slimming down to the required 5 or 6. I am coming to realize that it is not as difficult as first it seems. You really only have to;
Say what you Do.
Do what you Say.
Prove it.
Improve it.
I am sure your company is already doing this, its just a matter of putting it into a process that works for you. I THINK...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25th November 2002, 10:42 AM
Withrow Withrow is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ohio
 
Posts: 2
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 29
Karma: 10
Withrow has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

I had similar concerns about AS9000, well AS9100 to be exact. You only need the five procedures documented, that is true, but there is also the documentation that you have to keep for quality records and meeting minutes.

Of course you need to keep you quality records, inspection and test records, etc., but with meetings, I finally got a clear translation on what is needed.

You have to show proof that executive management is kept up to date on what is going on with the company concerning quality and process's. This is done with a meeting summary and a written statement by the chief executive officer in the meeting, stating his or her opinion on the information that they just received. We only have to do this on our "Managers meeting" when each section reports for the month. The meeting is once a month, seven sections and the meeting summary is two pages, very brief.

The only other meeting documentation that you need is to document supervisor meetings with general staff to show managements commitment to flowing down process, quality and customer concerns to the people actually doing the work. Again very short and simple.

This is all of the documentation that we utilize, and I had no problem getting AS9101 registered.

I hope that this helps.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12th December 2005, 11:10 AM
Hoeyster's Avatar
Hoeyster Hoeyster is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Jul 2005
Location: Illinois
 
Posts: 49
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 18
Karma: 10
Hoeyster has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BadgerMan

AS 9100a contains the same note under 4.2.1. Section 4.2 of the standard will tell you pretty much all you need to know and it appears to be pretty flexible to allow for operations of different size and complexity.

If you interpret the AS 9100a standard literally, you will find that it requires a quality manual and only five “documented procedures”. Since we (my company) have not been through an AS 9100 rev A audit yet, I am not sure how our registrar will interpret the standard. I reality, we have quite a few “documented procedures”……..probably too many! The standard requires procedures in the following areas:

4.2.3, Control of Documents
4.2.4, Control of Records
8.3, Control of Nonconforming Product
8.5.2, Corrective Action
8.5.3, Preventive Action

Work instructions are the “meat” of the quality system but they can take many different forms (keep this in mind and be creative). The number and type will depend on the size and complexity of the organization.

As for records, they are the evidence that you are doing what your quality system documents say you will do. Again, the amount depends on the size and complexity of you operation.

I think it is critical that your chosen registrar understands your operation. Shop around for a registrar/auditor who has experience with smaller facilities/operations.

Good luck.
OK you lost me here Badgerman. Where and how does it say that you only need 5 procedures. I am inexperienced in AS9100B but have been given the task of implementing our QMS system. I come from a small precision machining of aerospace parts mom and pop shop (26 employees). I want to do the bare minimum to become compliant. If I only have to have 5 procedures I will focus my energies on those 5.
Can you help me out here?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12th December 2005, 11:40 AM
BadgerMan's Avatar
BadgerMan BadgerMan is offline
Moderator

Registration Date: Feb 2001
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Age: 48
 
Posts: 485
Thanks Given to Others: 36
Thanked 73 Times in 64 Posts
Karma Power: 64
Karma: 979
BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Default

Compare the 9K2K format to the old revison '94 of ISO and you will see that the requirement for "documented procedures" has been relaxed significantly.

Read Note 1 in section 4.2.1 of the standard and then search the standard for the phrase "documented procedure".

I count six in total. However, sections 7.5.1.2 and 7.5.1.3 also kinda sorta maybe indicate the need for a procedure too. So, worst case....eight "documented procedures".

Now, I would imagine if there is evidence that the system or process is not well defined (via other methods) someone like an auditor may suggest that a "procedure" is lacking. By other methods I mean things like signs, labels, flow charts, training modules, etc.
__________________
Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Aerospace and Aviation Requirements > AS9100 Aerospace Standard and Requirements

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
ISO 9001 for a REALLY small business Peveril ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 31 7th May 2009 01:23 AM
Starting a Small Business Marc Occupation Discussions 24 27th July 2006 03:19 PM
Which quality system to register to? Small business bluejay04 ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 10 24th July 2006 02:11 PM
ISO 9002 in small business that provides telecommunications service W MacReynolds Service Industry Specific Topics 8 19th May 2000 05:51 AM
Why implement ISO 9001 In A Small Business? Marc ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 5 16th December 1999 08:19 AM



The time now is 04:04 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts