|
|
 |
|

19th November 2002, 12:39 PM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Nov 2002
Location: IRAN/TEHRAN
|
|
Posts: 2
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 29 Karma: 10 
|
|
Supplier and Subcontractor
Hello everybody,
I have a basic question about these two term; Supplier and Subcontractor,
What are differents between these two word and their concepts?
Last edited by Quality Researcher; 19th November 2002 at 12:49 PM.
|

19th November 2002, 02:13 PM
|
 |
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected
Registration Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southfield, Michigan
|
|
Posts: 102
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0 Karma: 10 
|
|
Subcontractors are defined a providers of production materials, or production or service parts, directly to a supplier to Chrysler, Ford, General Motors or other customers subscribing to this document. Also included are providers of heat treating, painting, plating or other finishing services.
Suppliers are defined as providers of a) production materials, b) production or service parts, or c) heat treating, plating, painting or other finishing services directly to Chrysler, Ford, General Motors or other customers subscribing to this document.
Does this answer your question?
Angela
|

19th November 2002, 04:04 PM
|
 |
Dogs rule
Registration Date: Jul 2002
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 56
|
|
Posts: 980
Thanks Given to Others: 15
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Karma Power: 69
|
|
Angela
Could you explain the difference in your definitions. I just don't see it.
Just a note
Ts 16949 - Clause 3 - Terms and Definitions - "Also, the term "supplier" now replaces the term "subcontractor". "
Without getting into a semantics debate, use of the term supplier makes more sense than subcontractor - at least for our business. Even if we "subcontract", the part (or service) is still "supplied" to us.
I'm starting to get dizzy. I'm sorry I can't present my thoughts better right now, but maybe my gibberish will click something in someone else's head.
Bill
__________________
There is no psychiatrist in the world like a puppy licking your face. - Ben Williams
|

19th November 2002, 04:53 PM
|
 |
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected
Registration Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southfield, Michigan
|
|
Posts: 102
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0 Karma: 10 
|
|
Okay. My definitions came from the QS-9000 Third Edition Quality System Requirement manual. What are you looking for? ISO9000:2000, TS or QS?
Angela
|

20th November 2002, 02:33 AM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Nov 2002
Location: IRAN/TEHRAN
|
|
Posts: 2
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 29 Karma: 10 
|
|
Thank u all,
But I haven't recieved my answer yet. I want to know the reason of replacing "Subcontractor" with "Supplier" by ISO.
I think your answers aren't good reason for them.
rgds Quality Researcher
|

20th November 2002, 05:12 AM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Jul 2002
Location: Thailand
|
|
Posts: 114
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 32 Karma: 25 
|
|
Why replace subcontractor by supplier.
Why replace subcontractor by supplier.
In ISO 9000:1994 the company/organization that produces the goods is called supplier. The company/organization supplies goods to the customer. And the one who supplies materiails to the company/organization is called subcontractor or sub-supplier.
So the supply chain looks like this:
Subcontractor/sub-supplier----->Supplier----->Customer
In ISO 9000:2000 the words are changed as they use in the ordinary definition or the definition in the dictionary.
So the supply chain looks like this:
Supplier----->Company/organization----->Customer.
|

20th November 2002, 10:13 AM
|
|
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: May 2001
Location: Warren, MI
|
|
Posts: 548
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Karma Power: 67
|
|
Under the QS definitions:
Supplier = organization implementing QS-9000 and producing product.
Subcontractor = companies the supplier buys stuff from.
Customer = company the supplier sells to.
It does not matter where in the supply chain you are - if you are the one implementing QS, you are the supplier.
ISO 9001: 2000 and TS-16949: 2000 changed supplier to organization and subcontractor to supplier. I think the main reason was that the use of supplier and subcontractor is confusing, since they are synonyms in a normal dictionary. Organization is now the company implementing the standard, supplier is the company they buy from. Customer remains the same.
In one of my first ISO meetings many years ago we spent about 3 hours debating which term to use in our purchasing procedure: supplier, subcontractor or vendor. Could not convince management it did not matter - pick one and stick with it.
Tom
|

20th November 2002, 04:01 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Feb 2001
Location: Wellington, OH USA
Age: 69
|
|
Posts: 1,604
Thanks Given to Others: 80
Thanked 289 Times in 172 Posts
Karma Power: 149
|
|
Tom - with all respect, those are not the definitions given in my QS-9000 Third Edition.
Subcontractor - Subcontractors are defined as providers of production materials, or production or service parts, directly to a supplier to C, F GM or other customers subscribing to this [QS] document.
Supplier - Suppliers are defined as providers of: a0 production materials, b) production or service parts, or c) heat treating, plating, painting or other finishing services, directly (underline is theirs, not mine) to C, F GM or other customers subscribing to this [QS] document.
Dave
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|