|
|
 |

20th November 2002, 12:25 PM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Aug 2002
Location: Columbus, OH. USA
Age: 42
|
|
Posts: 308
Thanks Given to Others: 14
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Karma Power: 43
|
|
Management Review Meeting Process
My company has been certified since 1999 to ISO 9002:1994. Prior to our certification we had an annual meeting every December. Our Mangement Review Meeting involving Top Management is centered around this one event. We have an Administrative Office and 19 Operational Facilities. Each Facility Manager is viewed as the Presidents designee and responsible for the entire QMS as decided by our registrar. This year the decision was made to cancel the meeting for specific reasons. My problem is trying to determine how to stay compliant with this requirement. The President has commited to traveling to each facility and holding individual meetings with the asscociates.
My question is..Will this scenario work?
I would like to hold a Top Level Management Review meeting with the ones in charge at the Administrative Location, document the minutes, actions, decistions etc as a result of the meeting. Since the Facility Managers can not be present, I would then distrubute all of the minutes and information from the meeting via email and ask for feedback.
Can I type up something explaining a deviation from the current procedure and handle as outlined above?
|

20th November 2002, 09:09 PM
|
 |
Aussie Bloke
Registration Date: Nov 1999
Location: Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Age: 47
|
|
Posts: 495
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 8 Posts
Karma Power: 51 Karma: 84 
|
|
How does the company satisfy the basic requirements of management review?
Put the answer in your procedure.
If the answer is the new method of reviewing the management system, it's measures, results, objectives, WHATEVER, then OK.
Management Review doesn't have to be a meeting.
__________________
Aussie Bloke
|

21st November 2002, 03:39 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Greenwood (Ft Smith area), Arkansas, USA
Age: 58
|
|
Posts: 6,224
Thanks Given to Others: 33
Thanked 1,248 Times in 807 Posts
Karma Power: 397
|
|
I think if you look at and study the requirement, you will notice that management review is identified as a process and not as a singular event. Our 2 island anchored buds are giving you some pretty good advice.
|

21st November 2002, 06:54 AM
|
 |
Forum Administrator
Registration Date: May 2000
Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
Age: 49
|
|
Posts: 3,771
Thanks Given to Others: 246
Thanked 244 Times in 172 Posts
Karma Power: 213
|
|
We had a good discussion about that a while back. Have a look at this thread.
Management review
/Claes
|

21st November 2002, 09:42 AM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Aug 2002
Location: Columbus, OH. USA
Age: 42
|
|
Posts: 308
Thanks Given to Others: 14
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Karma Power: 43
|
|
Great Ideas
Thanks for the great ideas. The thread you referred me too helped tremendously!
|

21st November 2002, 10:06 AM
|
 |
Forum Administrator
Registration Date: May 2000
Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
Age: 49
|
|
Posts: 3,771
Thanks Given to Others: 246
Thanked 244 Times in 172 Posts
Karma Power: 213
|
|
Re: Great Ideas
Quote:
C Emmons said:
Thanks for the great ideas. The thread you referred me too helped tremendously!
|
Glad to hear it. I thougt that thread was rather good myself.
/Claes
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|