|
|
 |
|

4th December 2002, 11:07 PM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Mar 2001
Location: Manila, Philippines
Age: 38
|
|
Posts: 639
Thanks Given to Others: 225
Thanked 63 Times in 49 Posts
Karma Power: 73
|
|
Internal Audit Vs. Process Audit
We haven't perform an internal audit for the year and now, I'm trying to consider our process audit in exchange with the planned internal audit. Can we consider process audit as an internal audit since" in internal audit to determine that the QMS conforms to the planned arrangements (7.1),...and is effectively implemented and maintained" and process audit has an almost same meaning conform, effectively implemented and maintained?  We perform process audit daily and randomly audit every department according the requirements of the customer and QMS.
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Raffy
|

5th December 2002, 09:04 AM
|
|
|
Internal Audit vs. Process Audit
We have just been ISO 9001:2000 Certified - so I may be going out on a limb here, but a similar question came up about our auditing procedure. If it is stated in your procedure that either is appropriate, then you can state it. However, if your procedure does not address the matter - you may have a nonconformance.
Does that make sense to you?
|

5th December 2002, 09:19 AM
|
|
Been around a while
Registration Date: Jan 2002
Location: Southeastern USA
|
|
Posts: 1,995
Thanks Given to Others: 281
Thanked 266 Times in 211 Posts
Karma Power: 171
|
|
HI
The question here is what are you auditing against.
For a process audit, you would be looking at the requirements of a specific process and the process' performance against these requirements.
For an internal ISO 9001 audit, you would be looking at the Quality Management System versus the standard.
They may look similar, but the aim is different. That said, in practice, I would say that many internal ISO audits end up being a hybrid of the 2 types...
Hope this helps
|

5th December 2002, 11:23 AM
|
 |
Dogs rule
Registration Date: Jul 2002
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 56
|
|
Posts: 980
Thanks Given to Others: 15
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Karma Power: 69
|
|
We just passed our "16949" surveillance audit and one of the "minor" findings was that our internal audits had to include the "Product realization" process (APQP). All we had been doing were "process" and "product" (dock) audits, also (we contract for the "System" audits).
Bill
__________________
There is no psychiatrist in the world like a puppy licking your face. - Ben Williams
|

5th December 2002, 11:45 AM
|
 |
Forum Administrator
Registration Date: May 2000
Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
Age: 49
|
|
Posts: 3,771
Thanks Given to Others: 246
Thanked 244 Times in 172 Posts
Karma Power: 213
|
|
Quote:
Craig H. said:
---X---
They may look similar, but the aim is different. That said, in practice, I would say that many internal ISO audits end up being a hybrid of the 2 types...
Hope this helps
|
I agree. That's usually the case.
/Claes
|

5th December 2002, 01:32 PM
|
|
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected
Registration Date: Sep 1998
Location: St. Marys, PA
|
|
Posts: 302
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0 Karma: 40 
|
|
Is it safe to assume that product audits in TS2 are the same as dock or final inspections - inprocess inspections?
|

5th December 2002, 02:09 PM
|
 |
Dogs rule
Registration Date: Jul 2002
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 56
|
|
Posts: 980
Thanks Given to Others: 15
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Karma Power: 69
|
|
Quote:
Dawn asked:
Is it safe to assume that product audits in TS2 are the same as dock or final inspections - inprocess inspections?
|
Yes (per our registrar anyway)
Bill
__________________
There is no psychiatrist in the world like a puppy licking your face. - Ben Williams
|

5th December 2002, 05:46 PM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Dec 2002
Location: New England
|
|
Posts: 1
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 29 Karma: 10 
|
|
Just wanted to add my two cents as this is a current topic of discussion for our team. I have found that senior management's perception of the internal compliance audit is that of a non value add activity. Over the past 8 - 12 months I have shifted our internal audit focus to business objectives and then translate the applicable ISO clause appropriate to the review. What I am beginning to see is a cliff at the end of the year where I will have to specificly target many clauses that did not come up during the year's review. I am still working on this model and hope to strike a more meaningfull balance moving forward.
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|