|
|
 |
|

24th January 2003, 02:54 AM
|
 |
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arad Doman
|
|
Posts: 33
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 32 Karma: 10 
|
|
paperless system vs record retention
Hi All,
I dont know exactly where to put this topic but can anyone please tell me how i can make our reports paperless (through intranet or email) and how would the record retention fit in.
Do we need to have a hard copy of say, a weekly report, or can we get away with just saving it in a hard disk?
oh, and yes, i know this is bordering ambiguity as i can't properly put to words what i have in mind. <sigh>
cheers!
__________________
I don't have a solution but I admire the problem. :biglaugh:
|

24th January 2003, 09:25 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Feb 2001
Location: Wellington, OH USA
Age: 69
|
|
Posts: 1,604
Thanks Given to Others: 80
Thanked 289 Times in 172 Posts
Karma Power: 149
|
|
To my knowledge, QS and ISO are in agreement on this.
QS states "Documents and data can be in the form of any type of media, such as hard copy or electronic media."
A side note though. If you have a lab, your original data has to be saved. If you make your test calculations on a paper napkin, save the napkin.
Dave
|

24th January 2003, 11:12 AM
|
 |
Forum Moderator
Registration Date: Dec 1999
Location: Texas
|
|
Posts: 411
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 118 Times in 70 Posts
Karma Power: 89
|
|
The major company I work for has had a long standing goal of becoming as completely paperless as possible. I won't disagree with the comment in the previous reply about saving your original data, as I am not in that specialty area.
That said, if you take data electronically, you could also save electronically.
The catch with saving everything electronically (which I support), is that you need to have adequate measures to assure you don't lose data. We have a very extensive system of backups to a level where it sometimes gets pretty annoying.
Our document control is set up where the electronic copy of a spec, held in the electronic repository is the official copy, and paper copies are considered "Uncontrolled" (unless you make allowances in individual cases).
Our official reporting is web-based, and the servers used to hold all the web-based information are in a well operated back-up system.
I would even contend that hand written paper copies could be scanned, put into PDF (or TIF, JPG, GIF, or what ever works best), then electronically archived.
With the right operational safeguards (i.e.: data security, good backups, etc..) that a paperless system is easier to deal with. You could be in an office in China, an auditor wants to see original data taken in a lab in New York two years ago (assuming your record retention policy requires that data to be retained). In an electronic data retention system, you could easily pull up the original handwritten document in electronic format for the auditor.
I'll stop short of saying that you could dispose of the original piece of paper (based on the previous reply). I wonder whether in such a comprehensive documentation system whether even in his circumstances you could legitimately discard the piece of paper and archive the electronic facsimile of it? I'm not sure on that one.
My company, by the way, is QS9000 (soon TS16949).
|

28th January 2003, 08:18 AM
|
 |
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arad Doman
|
|
Posts: 33
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 32 Karma: 10 
|
|
hey guys,
Thanks a bunch.
Will saving data electronically provide issues about authenticities? for example, if I scanned a calibration certificate, and it has a dry seal on it, and save it in a hard disk, would it (the scanned certificate) still be authentic? .
Thanks again,
Cheers!
__________________
I don't have a solution but I admire the problem. :biglaugh:
|

28th January 2003, 08:35 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
|
|
Posts: 1,643
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 63 Times in 44 Posts
Karma Power: 80
|
|
Lord
I guess when we need to consider authenticity that carefully then perhaps we should consider legal advice.
It might be OK for running your system, but is it admissable in court in defence of a product liability claim to produce scanned documents ??
I dont know ?
|

28th January 2003, 09:01 AM
|
 |
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arad Doman
|
|
Posts: 33
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 32 Karma: 10 
|
|
M,
Thanks. I haven't really thought about that but i can see it does present complications. I think as long as the original and the copy of the document are notarized, then its ok. (Though of course, its very impractical)
Keeping the legalities aside, do you think we don't violate any standards (ISO/QS) in scanning a calibration certificates?
Cheers!
__________________
I don't have a solution but I admire the problem. :biglaugh:
|

28th January 2003, 10:06 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
|
|
Posts: 1,643
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 63 Times in 44 Posts
Karma Power: 80
|
|
Neither of the standards you quote are specific on any certification requirements - so as far as compliance to these standards you are OK.
|

28th January 2003, 12:30 PM
|
 |
Forum Moderator
Registration Date: Dec 1999
Location: Texas
|
|
Posts: 411
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 118 Times in 70 Posts
Karma Power: 89
|
|
As I said in my previous reply, under most circumstances, there is no reason a paper copy must be maintained. However, in legal liability situations, it does seem conceivable to need a true original with the raised seal etc.
So I will be very specific that I would not recommend going paperless in such circumstances without some legal advice.
I would be interested to hear a valid, authoritative opinion on this one.
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|