|
|
 |
|

25th January 2003, 09:58 AM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chennai - India
Age: 32
|
|
Posts: 293
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 39 Karma: 43 
|
|
corrective action
During our last corrective action team meeting , we found that around 60% of the quality problems were due to the operators not inspecting the parts as per the control plan given to them. What should be done in such cases? Inspite of numerous training programmes and warnings, we found that this situation is not improving. any suggestions?
|

26th January 2003, 02:28 PM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
|
|
Posts: 1,643
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 63 Times in 44 Posts
Karma Power: 80
|
|
I suggest you do a '5 Why' analysis on the inspection process to determine root cause.
If the inspectors are just plain negligent (possible but doubtful) then you would need to take disciplinary action, however I would suspect that you find a problem somewhere with the system.
If on the other hand you actually want to improve quality try to determine the causes of the actual faults and eliminate them, as you cannot inspect quality into the product.
|

13th March 2003, 09:42 AM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chennai - India
Age: 32
|
|
Posts: 293
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 39 Karma: 43 
|
|
The quality problems could have been identified if the operator had checked the components at the frequency of 10 pieces / hour as required by the control plan.
In one case the operator had not taken out the end bits that was found in the production batch inspite of us providing a sensor that STOPS the machine if there is not sufficient material to feed the bar to the required length.
|

13th March 2003, 10:32 AM
|
|
An Early 'Cover'
Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Coast US
|
|
Posts: 1,773
Thanks Given to Others: 24
Thanked 51 Times in 39 Posts
Karma Power: 103
|
|
Andrews,
I don't know enough about the problem to comment in depth, but Martin's idea is a good one. I would also say you could try throwing the problem back at those believed to be "at fault". Tell them the problem, the consequences of the problem to the rest of the process or the customer or money/time lost or whatever, and then ask them how they propose to eliminate this problem. Sometimes this works and you find some solutions you would not have considered and you get more buy-in.
__________________
Mike S. ("Gun Nut")
And they ask me why I drink....
|

13th March 2003, 04:09 PM
|
|
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Sep 2001
Location: Southern Indiana
Age: 47
|
|
Posts: 941
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 29 Times in 25 Posts
Karma Power: 65
|
|
Are your operators on an ineffective production bonus system.
|

13th March 2003, 04:27 PM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Feb 2003
Location: Marion, IN USA
Age: 57
|
|
Posts: 514
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 13 Posts
Karma Power: 66
|
|
Perhaps you need to go back to the operators and explain to them what you have observed, and ask them why they are not performing the inspections according to the control plan.
You may find such system issues as: Unrealistic production quotas that do not allow time for inspection, inefficient inspection methods/tooling, or any number of issues attributable to the system and not the workers.
I continue to believe that a worker will do the right things, if the system allows.
__________________
David D. Hartman
|

13th March 2003, 05:01 PM
|
 |
Mod...
Registration Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oregon, MI
Age: 51
|
|
Posts: 577
Thanks Given to Others: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Karma Power: 46
|
|
Sounds like root cause has not been adequately determined.
How about getting away from the operator for the moment and think about why training, write-ups, discipline have not worked?
Are instructions posted?
Have the instructions been tested for ease of use?
Is the level of supervision on the floor adequate?
Is final quality responsibility with manufacturing or quality?
Are there language or dialect problems?
Are there ongoing tests of operator capabilities?
Does management really care?
Are you using the correct tools to determine process capability?
Is the gage control system robust and proven?
ETC...
Just wanted to get the gist of my view across.
__________________
"Para ... Bellum"
|

13th June 2003, 12:48 PM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: May 2002
Location: Romania/Bucharest
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 40
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 36
|
|
Did you try to apply The Golden Rules of Gemba KAIZEN?
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|