The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO and IEC Medical Device Related Standards > ISO 13485 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 8th February 2003, 04:30 AM
Denis's Avatar
Denis Denis is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK
Age: 54
 
Posts: 103
Thanks Given to Others: 20
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Karma Power: 38
Karma: 186
Denis is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.Denis is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Question Finished product visual status - Each box must have a QC status identifier?

Hi,can any offer some advice on a thorny issue regarding final inspection and booking product into Finished Goods warehouse?

We produce various cleanroom contamination products ( liquid based in this instance) in cleanroom conditions. Once our product has been made it is packed into boxes ( typically 8 bottles to a box. These boxes are then put onto pallets, possibly as many as 80 on one pallet.

The pallets are then sent for irradiation, where the pallets remain intact and are not broken down at all.

Product arrives back at our factory, where we perform a sampling plan to determine that the detex label has changed colour to positively confirm that irradaition has occured.

Paperwork is then completed and product should be booked into finished goods, however..............

Various auditors have made the point that each box should have a QC status identifier. In this case a stamped message "QC Approved".

This causes us a real bottle neck in booking product in due to the shear volume of product returning from irradiation. Not only that, but I see it as a totally none added value task.

Any comments / help
__________________
Regards,
Denis
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 10th February 2003, 09:10 AM
DaveG
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default Individual QC Status

Denis;

Your instincts are correct. At times auditors would like belts, suspenders, garters, etc. and ignore that at some point, systems either function or they don't. Additional "things" at that point only confound the issue further.

There is no requirement regarding the need to identify each box/case individually after sterilization. However, your Q system / procedures should clearly state how someone can ascertain the status of cases at all times regarding their sterility. For example, use of quarantine areas, some sort of pallet label with the number of cases & lot numbers, or only full pallet "rule-of-thumb" are some examples that should be captured in the SOP. Also used are release-to-stock reconciliation reports /audits.

The integrity of the system is ultimately in the hands of the employees. To remove an auditors doubts, demonstrate training & follow-up with periodic mini-audits that demonstrate functionality of the system. These mini-audits should only be conducted at a frequency dictated by issues (or lack of them) found.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO and IEC Medical Device Related Standards > ISO 13485 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Process Status - Any TS 16949 requirements related to knowing the process status? vanputten ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7 29th April 2009 09:05 AM
Product Status Identification after receiving inspection? rharold ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 11 9th May 2007 01:13 PM
Elsmar Cove forum status upgrade to Contributor Status amanbhai Forum News and General Information 3 10th June 2005 01:07 PM
GMP Inspection Requirements - Eliminating Visual status of finished goods Denis Inspection and Test, Sampling and Related Topics 6 12th March 2004 08:22 AM
Red, Yellow, and Green and QS9000 Suppliers - Visual evaluation of the status dbulak QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 2 21st March 2001 08:13 PM



The time now is 07:24 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts