The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc.


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 7th March 2003, 05:02 PM
lday38 lday38 is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: May 2002
Location: Naugatuck,CT
Age: 57
 
Posts: 137
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Karma Power: 33
Karma: 31
lday38 has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Send a message via AIM to lday38
Lightbulb Using Cpk index for Accept / Reject Decisions

MY company has been using the Cpk value on the points plotted on their control charts to make accept/ reject decisions on their product when a poitn goes outside the limits.
However, the spc electronic file can have a months of data in it, the Cpk being reflected is through that period, not through the current production lot or subgroup. It is my understanding that Ford want you to sort when the Cpk vlaue is under 1.33.
I should also mention they monitor only twice a shift. I also
have set modified reject limits ( 4std dev) away form the min and max specification to get them to buy into spc. ( the old thing yyyyou are cutting our tolerances, the whole quality thing is new to this comapny) They were trained but in practice it is differant.
Can anyone suggest a workable way to meet the automitive requirments with this senario?
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 11th March 2003, 10:15 AM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline

Registration Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 67
 
Posts: 1,437
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 90
Karma: 1020
Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Default

Cpk can only be used to make decisions about the process; not the parts.
However, if the data is several months old you can't make a reliable decision about the process.
You are correct, Ford requires 100% sort of product when the Cpk is below 1.33. Also read the notes atg the bottom page 72 of the QS standard.
__________________
Sam Goody
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc.

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Calculating an AQL given a sample size, accept/reject numbers, and lot size seve00 AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 2 10th April 2009 05:19 PM
Composite Process Capability Index - Cpk is not additive cyberspider Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 3 8th September 2007 11:11 AM
Internal threads - Maximum / Minor accept/reject diameter inspection leetimothyj Inspection and Test, Sampling and Related Topics 6 8th March 2007 04:29 PM
Is Cpm (Taguchi's Index) Superior to Cpk and Ppk? cyberspider Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 1 5th August 2005 10:25 AM
Cp and Cpk - Cpk is an index that should be applied to a stable process Don Winton Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 16 13th August 2001 06:50 PM



The time now is 08:52 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts