|
|
 |

4th April 2003, 12:28 AM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Dec 2002
Location: South East Asia
|
|
Posts: 63
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 30 Karma: 30 
|
|
QMS audit, process audit, product audit
In the element 8, the requirements asked for the QMS audit, manufacturing process audit and product audit.
Can all these audit be done together ?
What are the main differences between all of these audits, in term of approach, in term of area to look for, sampling , etc ?
Thanks
|

4th April 2003, 10:03 AM
|
 |
Registration Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 67
|
|
Posts: 1,437
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 90
|
|
I have taken this approach:
- QMS - I use the 50 page checklist that my CB uses. Similar to the one published by AIAG. I will do this audit once per year.
- Manufacturing Process Audits- I will use the approach described in the IAAG supplier auditor course; inputs, activities,support processes, interfaces, outputs. Process auditing is the key to a successful audit.
This audit includes all areas effecting Mfg.,i.e., scheduling, industrial engineering, maintenance.
I wil initially conduct these audits monthly for the first year and then move to quarterly.
- Product audit - I see this as a random sampling of completed product from a cell or partially completed product prior to moving to the next cell. I will conduct these audits once pr day per product type.
__________________
Sam Goody
|

7th April 2003, 11:03 AM
|
 |
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Jan 2003
Location: Louisiana
|
|
Posts: 124
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 31 Karma: 55 
|
|
My thinking on this would be that a process audit would/could be a control plan audit.
And a product audit would be coverd by a dock audit (an audit of finished goods).
Do you think that this would cover the requirements?
|

8th April 2003, 07:44 AM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
|
|
Posts: 62
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 38 Karma: 10 
|
|
IMO, to do only Dock Audit may be not enough for Product audit since the standard require to perform product audit every appropriate production stages.
What I am thinking is to combine process and product audit in the same time by using process control plan as a guide, then randomly check product with specification.
Is this make sense?
Regards,
QSMSO
|

8th April 2003, 09:16 AM
|
 |
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Jan 2003
Location: Louisiana
|
|
Posts: 124
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 31 Karma: 55 
|
|
In our process there are only really four stages. Mold, trim, punch, and package. All of these can easily be checked in a dock audit. Our dock audits are performed on a different part each week. The frequency is raised if we have a problem part.
I still think that this should work. We just submitted our package to Entela, so I guess we will soon find out.
|

8th April 2003, 09:28 AM
|
 |
Registration Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 67
|
|
Posts: 1,437
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 90
|
|
IMO, either way will work, As long as your process is defined and results documented.
__________________
Sam Goody
|

8th April 2003, 10:49 AM
|
 |
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Jan 2003
Location: Louisiana
|
|
Posts: 124
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 31 Karma: 55 
|
|
I sure hope so! Hey we need a symbol with crossed fingers.
Where in Oklahoma are you from Sam? I was born in OKC.
|

17th June 2003, 03:04 PM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pennsylvania
|
|
Posts: 4
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 27 Karma: 10 
|
|
As we ramp up for TS 16949 .....planned for Nov. 03. Our approach has been to select a part and "walk the control plan" to ensure that we are meeting requirements to the control plan. We have expanded the audit to include the review of: documentation (doc. control), calibration (both process and product), qualification of assigned employees, tracking and staging of product etc. This has proved to be beneficial primarily because it gives us a vertical slice of our processes and in doing so a better feel as to our compliance in all of our QMS areas. Right or wrong this is our story and for now we are sticking to it LOL.
__________________
Remember some how some way EVERYDAY is an adventure!
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|