The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Aerospace and Aviation Standards and Requirements > AS9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements
Forum Username


Search the Elsmar Cove
Custom Search
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page  Elsmar Cove Twitter Feed
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Sponsor Links





Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access

Click the graphic above.
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

Howard's
International Quality Services
Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality

Related Topic Tags
as9100 - aerospace quality management systems, audit nonconformances and findings, scope of certification (aka registration)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 30th September 2013, 10:14 AM
kevwb kevwb is offline
Getting Involved (>6 Posts)

 
Registration Date: Dec 2008
Location: UNITED KINGDOM
 
Posts: 6
Thanks Given to Others: 4
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 23
Karma: 15
kevwb has less than 100 Karma points so far.
I Say... AS9100 Change in Registration Scope - Audit Nonconformance

Advice please,

We recently underwent a re certification audit and have asked our scope to be changed, the removal of a service we no longer provide. During the audit a minor NC was raised because we had not changed this in our manual, do you consider this to be a valid NC particularly since our scope within our manual accurately reflects what is detailed in our current certificate.

Conversely if we had changed our scope would we have received an NC for it not matching our certificate.

Thanks in advance

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 30th September 2013, 10:23 AM
Mikishots's Avatar
Mikishots Mikishots is offline
Appreciated Member

 
Registration Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
 
Posts: 821
Thanks Given to Others: 334
Thanked 480 Times in 336 Posts
Karma Power: 102
Karma: 3745
Mikishots is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Mikishots is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mikishots is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mikishots is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mikishots is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mikishots is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mikishots is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mikishots is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Re: AS9100 Change in Scope

Kevwb,

What was the specific wording of this finding that was raised?

__________________

You can't fake quality any more than you can fake a good meal.
WILLIAM S. BURROUGHS
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 30th September 2013, 10:32 AM
kevwb kevwb is offline
Getting Involved (>6 Posts)

 
Registration Date: Dec 2008
Location: UNITED KINGDOM
 
Posts: 6
Thanks Given to Others: 4
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 23
Karma: 15
kevwb has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Re: AS9100 Change in Scope

Thanks for the fast response, the NC stated

" Mi 1 - The organization shall establish and maintain a quality manual that includes a) the scope of the quality management system, including details of and justification for any exclusions.

Scope is incorrect."

Hope this helps and thanks.
  #4  
Old 30th September 2013, 02:00 PM
Big Jim Big Jim is offline
Appreciated Information Resource

 
Registration Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA, Southern California
 
Posts: 2,332
Thanks Given to Others: 1,091
Thanked 1,117 Times in 744 Posts
Karma Power: 274
Karma: 7311
Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Re: AS9100 Change in Scope

I think the auditor was out of place. You had not altered the scope yet, so it was correct. You were exploring the change.

I would encourage you to talk to the registrar about lifting the NCR.

That said, this could have been avoided if you would have talked to the registrar and settled this before the audit, which is really the best approach.
Thanks to Big Jim for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  #5  
Old 30th September 2013, 07:53 PM
AndyN's Avatar
AndyN AndyN is offline
Forum Moderator

 
Registration Date: Feb 2005
Location: Michigan, USA
 
Posts: 7,688
Thanks Given to Others: 4,390
Thanked 3,300 Times in 2,237 Posts
Karma Power: 850
Karma: 21859
AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via Skype™ to AndyN
Let Me Help You Re: AS9100 Change in Registration Scope - Audit Nonconformance

The scope of your QMS doesn't need to be the same as the scope of certification - the auditor is incorrect. You should talk to your CB and have them remove the NC and discuss why their auditor thinks this is OK to create such a finding. Your CB contract should state the scope of your certification and the auditor is supposed to audit to that - it's called the "scope" for that very reason!

__________________

'Cause you know sometimes words have two meanings.....
Thanks to AndyN for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  #6  
Old 30th September 2013, 10:49 PM
Sidney Vianna's Avatar
Sidney Vianna Sidney Vianna is offline
Post Responsibly

 
Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: California
 
Posts: 7,972
Thanks Given to Others: 1,672
Thanked 5,053 Times in 2,593 Posts
Karma Power: 916
Karma: 33878
Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Re: AS9100 Change in Registration Scope - Audit Nonconformance

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by AndyN View Post

The scope of your QMS doesn't need to be the same as the scope of certification
I agree, Andy.
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by AndyN View Post

Your CB contract should state the scope of your certification and the auditor is supposed to audit to that - it's called the "scope" for that very reason!
Although the question is related to AS9100, the ISO APG Paper on Scope of the QMS and Scope of Certification still applies.

From what the OP mentioned, the CB auditor wrote up the nonconformity because the organization's QMS scope is not accurately described in the Quality Manual. The paper hyperlinked above now has a paragraph that reads
Quote:
As an additional measure to combat potential confusion among customers and end users, the scope of registration/certification should be clearly defined in the organisation's Quality Manual and any publicly available documents (this includes, for example promotional and marketing material).

__________________

Sustainable conformity assessment must add value to all stakeholders
Thanks to Sidney Vianna for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  #7  
Old 1st October 2013, 05:52 AM
Big Jim Big Jim is offline
Appreciated Information Resource

 
Registration Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA, Southern California
 
Posts: 2,332
Thanks Given to Others: 1,091
Thanked 1,117 Times in 744 Posts
Karma Power: 274
Karma: 7311
Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Big Jim is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Re: AS9100 Change in Registration Scope - Audit Nonconformance

Anyone studying this should read the entire paper that Sidney linked. Don't go too far off on the tangent that the two scopes don't need to be the same. My reading of it certainly leaves me with the feeling that they need to be compatible.

The linked paper appears to talk about three scopes.

Scope of the QMS

Scope of registration

Scope on the certificate

All three could be different.

Element 4.2.2 requires that the quality manual include the scope of the QMS plus the justification of any exclusions.

The linked paper seems to say the same thing about the scope of registration, in that the scope of registration needs to include the scope of the QMS plus details about any exclusion.

The linked paper then goes on to explain that the scope on the certificate may be a synthesized description that does not include details about any exclusion.

The linked paper then goes on to explain an auditor's obligation in confirming that the scope statement is correct and not misleading.

It appears that the auditor was simply trying to do his job, which takes me back to my earlier comment that this should have been addressed with the registration company prior to the audit, and if it had of been, all of this could have been avoided. After all, registrants are required to notify the registration company when significant changes are made. It is always best to notify them sooner than later, and not just wait for an audit.
  #8  
Old 1st October 2013, 08:39 AM
AndyN's Avatar
AndyN AndyN is offline
Forum Moderator

 
Registration Date: Feb 2005
Location: Michigan, USA
 
Posts: 7,688
Thanks Given to Others: 4,390
Thanked 3,300 Times in 2,237 Posts
Karma Power: 850
Karma: 21859
AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via Skype™ to AndyN
Question Re: AS9100 Change in Registration Scope - Audit Nonconformance

Can a CB auditor write an NC against a ISO APG guide...?

__________________

'Cause you know sometimes words have two meanings.....
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Aerospace and Aviation Standards and Requirements > AS9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
AS9100 Scope Change to Include Manufacturing Services dwend AS9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 5 22nd March 2012 06:55 PM
Change of Scope/Location Audit - AS9100 Requirements andygr AS9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 1 11th November 2011 11:40 AM
Need help with AS9100 Scope Change to include Manufacturing Kasturi.P.Shetty Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 1 26th August 2011 07:05 AM
Change of Scope of Registration required? Petervan ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions 3 12th August 2010 07:45 AM
AS9100 Initial Exposure - Completed my first AS9100 Scope Extension audit Boscoeee AS9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 1 24th November 2008 03:54 PM



The time now is 08:18 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


   


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, Olde West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272