The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories > Measurement Uncertainty (MU)


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 29th April 2003, 12:44 PM
Charles Wathen Charles Wathen is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Feb 2002
Location: Temecula, CA
Age: 54
 
Posts: 86
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Karma Power: 33
Karma: 17
Charles Wathen has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question Laser Micrometer Uncertainty - Calibrating Deltronic Pin Gages

Hi guys,
I have a question on a uncertainty calculation that I'm trying to determine.

I want to determine the uncertainty of a measurement using my Zygo Gold laser micrometer when we calibrate Deltronic Pin Gages. Here is the info:
Zygo laser micrometer resolution: .000001"
Zygo laser micrometer accuracy: .00002"
Zygo laser micrometer repeatability: .000005"
Pin Gage Standard XXX (used to cal laser mic): .00001"

By calculating the above, I get an expanded uncertainty of .000026".

My question is: should I be including the accuracy of the Deltronic Pin Gage I'm calibrating? It has a standard accuracy of +.00004 -0".

If I do, then my expanded uncertainty is .000053" which seems higher than I expected. If I do use this, should I subtract this value from the .00004" tolerance of the Deltronic Pin Gage to come up with an uncertainty of .000013"?

Please help a confused soul.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 29th April 2003, 03:54 PM
Al Dyer's Avatar
Al Dyer Al Dyer is offline
Mod...

Registration Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oregon, MI
Age: 51
 
Posts: 577
Thanks Given to Others: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Karma Power: 46
Karma: 398
Al Dyer is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.Al Dyer is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.Al Dyer is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.Al Dyer is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Al Dyer
Default

My advice would be to drop the pin from the laser mike uncertainty calculation.

The laser is being reviewed, not the pin, and you should be able to use any size pin and get the same uncertainty.

Try a test with increasing sized pins and see if the linearity of the laser is stable
__________________
"Para ... Bellum"
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 2nd May 2003, 04:03 PM
Graeme's Avatar
Graeme Graeme is offline
$ Contributor

Registration Date: Sep 2000
Location: Lilburn, GA, USA
Age: 60
 
Posts: 401
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Karma Power: 63
Karma: 894
Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Graeme Send a message via MSN to Graeme Send a message via Yahoo to Graeme
Default Re: Uncertainty question

Quote:
Charles Wathen said:
My question is: should I be including the accuracy of the Deltronic Pin Gage I'm calibrating?
The measurement uncertainty applies to the measuring system. A measuring system is independent of the items it measures.

The uncertainty is used to help determine if the object being calibrated (the pin gage) is within its own accuracy specification.

The ratio between the measurement uncertainty (of the measuring system) and the accuracy specification (of the object being calibrated) is an indicator of the ability of the system to make that particular measurement.

If the object being calibrated was included as part of the measurement system, then it would be reasonable to be required to perform an MSA for every workload item! (Impractical, outrageous and uneconomic, but weirdly reasonable. )
__________________
Graeme C. Payne
ASQ Sr. Member; CQE; CCT

"Does it matter if the measurement result is wrong?
If it does, then calibrate the instrument.
If it doesn't matter, they why are you making the measurement?"
(P. G. Stein, 2000)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12th May 2003, 12:02 PM
Ryan Wilde's Avatar
Ryan Wilde Ryan Wilde is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Feb 2001
Location: Mineola, NY, USA
Age: 42
 
Posts: 187
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 41
Karma: 146
Ryan Wilde is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.Ryan Wilde is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Default Re: Uncertainty question

Quote:
Charles Wathen said:

Hi guys,
I have a question on a uncertainty calculation that I'm trying to determine.

I want to determine the uncertainty of a measurement using my Zygo Gold laser micrometer when we calibrate Deltronic Pin Gages. Here is the info:
Zygo laser micrometer resolution: .000001"
Zygo laser micrometer accuracy: .00002"
Zygo laser micrometer repeatability: .000005"
Pin Gage Standard XXX (used to cal laser mic): .00001"

By calculating the above, I get an expanded uncertainty of .000026".
Using all rectangular distributions, I got about the same. (0.0000265")

Quote:
My question is: should I be including the accuracy of the Deltronic Pin Gage I'm calibrating? It has a standard accuracy of +.00004 -0".
You wouldn't take into account the accuracy of the Deltronic Pin Gage, especially since that is what you are trying to determine. You would, however, need to incorporate the repeatability of measuring a deltronic gauge. Using your system, I would guess this to be around 0.000005" with a single standard deviation.

At this point, we have an uncertainty of about 0.000028".

What we are forgetting is the environmental effects. Temperature is the big wildcard on all dimensional measurements. If your laboratory is 68 ±5 °F (20 ± 2.8 °C), and you don't compensate for the thermal effects, you will have a very different uncertainty.

Thermal expansion of tool steel (such as a Deltronic Pin) is 6.4 µin/in/°F (11.5 µin/in/°C).

Therefore, if you are measuring a 0.5" pin at 72 °F (22.2 °C), and the pin is exactly 0.5" at standard temperature (68 °F/ 20 °C), you would actually measure [0.5" + (0.0000064" *0.5" *4 °F)], or 0.500013". With everything else in the system being perfect (which it isn't), you have an error of 0.000013" due to temperature alone.

I do not know the temperature effect on the Zygo laser, but thermal expansion of the pin, and thermal effects on the Zygo laser must be added to the uncertainty budget.

Quote:
If I do, then my expanded uncertainty is .000053" which seems higher than I expected. If I do use this, should I subtract this value from the .00004" tolerance of the Deltronic Pin Gage to come up with an uncertainty of .000013"?
No, the tolerance of the Deltronic pin has no bearing on your measurement. The tolerance of the pin under test is entirely arbitrary to the uncertainty of measuring the pin.

Ryan
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15th May 2003, 12:50 PM
Charles Wathen Charles Wathen is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Feb 2002
Location: Temecula, CA
Age: 54
 
Posts: 86
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Karma Power: 33
Karma: 17
Charles Wathen has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Thanks everyone for your feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15th May 2003, 06:57 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,859
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,568 Times in 1,020 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11569
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Lurker Link

Also see this thread for some thoughts on measurement uncertainty. It's a relative oldie (check some of the post dates), but it's a goodie:

Types of Measurement Uncertainty of Different Devices - Is there any Standard?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories > Measurement Uncertainty (MU)

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Choosing a Laser Micrometer - Your recommendations? mhirand20 ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 6 24th February 2009 01:50 PM
Calibrating pin gages - Can we write a procedure "Calibrate before use"? Examples? al40 ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 14 19th March 2008 11:19 AM
Micrometer resolution for calibrating thread plug gages RESET ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 7 5th May 2006 11:38 PM
Pin Gage Classifications - Use and tolerancing of Class XXX pin gages QE Bob ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 7 22nd November 2005 09:29 AM
Gage Pin Quality - Buying new pin sets cheaper than calibrating our current sets Jeff McBroom ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 6 25th February 2001 01:29 AM



The time now is 08:06 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts