|
|
 |
|

23rd May 2003, 10:47 AM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chennai - India
Age: 32
|
|
Posts: 293
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 39 Karma: 43 
|
|
Process Audit vs. Product Audit - What are the differences?
What does "process audit" really mean and how different is it from product audit ?
What are the steps to conduct one?
|

28th May 2003, 09:55 AM
|
 |
Registration Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 67
|
|
Posts: 1,437
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 90
|
|
Andrews,
For a process audit think in terms of the "5 M's";
Manpower, adequate, traineded,
Methods, work instructions,
Machine, maintenance, settings,
Materials, correct
Measures, efficiency, Cpk, on-going SPC, in-process inspection.
These are INPUTS, which is what makes the process work.
The product is the OUTPUT.
The product audit is verification & validation that the product meets the requirements of the design record.
__________________
Sam Goody
|

28th May 2003, 11:00 AM
|
|
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: May 2001
Location: Warren, MI
|
|
Posts: 548
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Karma Power: 67
|
|
My definition would be:
Process audit - making sure the product was made per the defined procedure/plan/arrangement. Example questions:
1. Was raw material purchased from an approved supplier?
2. Was material inspected per the inspection requirements?
3. Were gages used calibrated?
4. Is material in storage properly labeled, protected, etc?
5. Were proper instructions followed for removing from inventory (rotation, handling, etc.)?
6. Was part made on correct machine per the control plan?
7. Was SPC done as defined on the control plan?
8. Was process rate per requiremenets?
9. Do quality levels meet requireemtents (scrap, etc.)?
10. Are all steps on the control plan followed in the proper order?
11. Were inspection requirements followed?
12. Is the nonconforming product procedure followed when necessary?
Product Audit - making sure product meets all specifications.
1. Are all dimensions/specifications correct.?
2. Is it in the proper box/container?
3. Is the container properly labeled?
4. Is all paperwork completed properly?
I am sure there are more.
Tom
|

30th May 2003, 03:48 AM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Dec 2002
Location: South East Asia
|
|
Posts: 63
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 30 Karma: 30 
|
|
now that with process and product audit being stressed on in ISO/TS, the process audit to me is to ensure that whatever happen in the value-chain to produce the product is effective and efficient.
input --->process ---> output
it is no longer saying that with a trained personnels, and methodologies in place ensure the product is produce according to spec, with minimum wastage, low defect, etc...but the question is how effective and efficient ?
product audit on the other hand is done periodically to ensure customer receive the product they wants. Product audit is done on different stages. A lot of companies overlook the delivery process, where IMO is one of the important area.
|

30th May 2003, 09:16 AM
|
|
Been around a while
Registration Date: Jan 2002
Location: Southeastern USA
|
|
Posts: 1,996
Thanks Given to Others: 283
Thanked 267 Times in 212 Posts
Karma Power: 171
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by YKT
A lot of companies overlook the delivery process, where IMO is one of the important area.
|
YKT
Interesting you should say this. We have a lot more problems with "trucking complaints" than we do with complaints about our product. We sell FOB, our plant, and our customers usually arrange trucking, including choosing the trucker.
Well, some of the ones they choose have got to be doing "loop the loops", or some similar manuver, before they deliver to the customer. Broken and shifted bags are our fault, though (though legally, it should be between the customer and Evil Kenevil trucker).
Does anyone have experience effectively handling a similar situation?
Craig
|

30th May 2003, 10:09 AM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chennai - India
Age: 32
|
|
Posts: 293
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 39 Karma: 43 
|
|
Should adherence to cycle time be a checkpoint in the process audit?
Andrews
|

30th May 2003, 10:14 AM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chennai - India
Age: 32
|
|
Posts: 293
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 39 Karma: 43 
|
|
It's me again.
Shouldn't the process auditor be an expert in the process he audits?
Andrews
|

30th May 2003, 10:19 AM
|
 |
Forum Administrator
Registration Date: Mar 2000
Location: Pune, India
Age: 47
|
|
Posts: 1,073
Thanks Given to Others: 83
Thanked 84 Times in 55 Posts
Karma Power: 90
|
|
__________________
You are never given a wish without also being given the power to make it true. You may have to work for it, however. ~Richard Bach
|
|
Thanks to Atul Khandekar for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|