The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > National and International Business Standards > Customer and Company Specific Requirements


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 16th June 2003, 03:07 PM
SMcD SMcD is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada/Ontario
Age: 45
 
Posts: 13
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 28
Karma: 10
SMcD has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default Approval For Standard OEM Parts

As a distributor to the automotive industry I am never quite sure how we should submit approval.

We will soon be distributing fasteners to a plant makeing a GM product. Most of the suppliers and parts we will be dealing with have already been approved by GM.

At this point my customer has not clearly defined (decided) what they will require for approval. I am hoping (with your help) to come up with something that makes sense.

Is there some offical way that I can show that the supplier has been approved by GM (I heard something about an authorization for warrant only).

Is there also a quick easy way to show that GM has approved the part (Sub. Status Report).

Since the customer has no say in changing the appoved part/process it seems a waist of time, resources and money to submit level 3 PPAP's for appoval.

If you are a company that ships direct to GM as well as Tier 1 you may be able to give me some examples of how your Tier 1 customers deal with part approval.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 16th June 2003, 05:50 PM
Al Dyer's Avatar
Al Dyer Al Dyer is offline
Mod...

Registration Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oregon, MI
Age: 51
 
Posts: 577
Thanks Given to Others: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Karma Power: 46
Karma: 398
Al Dyer is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.Al Dyer is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.Al Dyer is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.Al Dyer is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Al Dyer
Default

Be wary of fasteners these days, there are new thread requirements and quite a few are safely items.

I don't want to comment on your next comments until you can reply with your companies exposure to Big 3 requirements.

Just as a note although, no matter what paperwork you supply with an APQP/PR/PPAP, there is still a need to perform the entire package and have it on hand if they ask for it.

Al...
__________________
"Para ... Bellum"
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 17th June 2003, 08:02 AM
Randy Stewart's Avatar
Randy Stewart Randy Stewart is offline
VINI, VIDI, DORMIVI

Registration Date: Feb 2002
Location: Walled Lake, Michigan
 
Posts: 1,153
Thanks Given to Others: 20
Thanked 79 Times in 51 Posts
Karma Power: 84
Karma: 1481
Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.
Question

My first question is What is the your customer required to submit to GM? Are they submitting a PPAP on the whole assembled product? If so they may need your PPAP in the package.
As for being a GM approved supplier, a couple comments.
First, it doesn't matter if you are "self certifying" under GM, if your immediate customer (tier 1) requests full PPAP documents then that is what will be your requirement (they may not be level 1 PPAP approved). Secondly, if you are a distributor does that mean that you do not manufacture the fasteners? If so then your supplier is the one to produce the required documentation to you.
I agree with Al, watch out for those fasteners!!!!
__________________
"What this country needs is more unemployed politicians." Edward Langley
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17th June 2003, 09:55 AM
SMcD SMcD is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada/Ontario
Age: 45
 
Posts: 13
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 28
Karma: 10
SMcD has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

In my effort to not run on and on I must have left out alot of info. Please understand @ this point I am just researching possibilities.

Our customer is /is not GM!!! It is a joint venture plant doing a new GM line. They are not QS (so far). That may explain why the requirements are yet to be determined and not written in stone.
As far as exposure, none. I am just starting to connect with our new suppliers and have had a few conversations in regard to how they had submitted approval to GM. (I have been working with QS for some time but have never worked with the Big 3 directly.)

I am only trying to avoid the cost of obtaining the documentation. APQP/PR/PPAP need to be done regardless. In fact if GM has already approved the part/process you can be sure it is done.

Yes we are a distributor. We have always in the past obtained, reviewed, approved submitted PPAPs from our suppliers whenever it was required by our customer. Please understand that so far this customer has not requested anything specific.

One mistake that I made in the past was submitting a PPAP (already appoved by the OEM) to a tier 1 customer. They had changes they wanted made. (one was to add a FMEA threshold but lets not go there). I had to find a very subtle way of explaining to them that this is a standard OEM part. It is shipped world wide to 100's of customers. It is not resonable to have the mfr. change the PPAP each time it is requested by a new customer. Hence my dilema. Why would you submit a Level 3 PPAP package that has already been approved by the top customer (OEM). It just seems a waist of time to me and most of all it makes no sense.

I was exploring the idea of sugesting to the customer that I provide a copy of the GM Submission Status Report as evidence of GM approval. Although it is less relevent I would also provide a copy of Authorization For Warrant ONly in the case where the Submission Status states Level 1 was submitted.

I know I can obtain and submit a level 3 for each and every part. This would be no problem although there will be costs involved. I just wanted to take a look at common sense. Maybe in the end that will have nothing to do with it at all.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > National and International Business Standards > Customer and Company Specific Requirements

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
What is PPAP (Production Part Approval Process) Why submit it and/with PSW ashram APQP and PPAP 2 6th February 2009 03:16 AM
PPAP Approval - Customer approval of PSW (part submission warrant) Peters APQP and PPAP 5 16th November 2008 07:06 PM
PMA Approval Based on Test & Computation OEM Requirements jameslaz Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 2 26th August 2008 08:53 AM
Do we need to submit our memory foam oxygen mask gasket for FDA approval? Seymour Medical Devices (21 CFR part 820) 4 1st January 2008 10:49 AM
FDA standard approval list - ANSI/AAMI SP10 - 1992 revision approval Nissim Shaked ISO 13485 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems 2 27th February 2005 11:08 AM



The time now is 11:27 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts