The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Design and Development - Process and Product


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1  
Old 16th June 2003, 08:15 PM
johnnybegood johnnybegood is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Jun 2001
 
Posts: 125
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 37
Karma: 47
johnnybegood has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Look! Designing a Mil-Std-105 or ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 Sampling Plan

We have a production with a run rate of 1k per shift. Production manually assemble the product and have it tested electrically at test station. Before the product is send for packing, Production will 100% visually inspect for mechanical/cosmetic defect. QA inspector will do sampling buy-off electrical and mechanical/cosmetic.
The product does not come to QA in a constant rate. My question is how do I generate a correct sampling plan? Customer goal is 0.08dphu
Reply With Quote
Thanks to johnnybegood for your informative Post and/or Attachment!

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 17th June 2003, 01:05 PM
howste's Avatar
howste howste is offline
Thaumaturge

Registration Date: May 2003
Location: Utah
 
Posts: 2,416
Thanks Given to Others: 377
Thanked 838 Times in 460 Posts
Karma Power: 206
Karma: 6556
howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

I'd probably set up a sampling plan based on ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 since it sounds like you're doing attribute sampling. MIL-STD-105E is equivalent to that standard, and you can download it free: Free Military Standards.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 17th June 2003, 02:10 PM
Al Dyer's Avatar
Al Dyer Al Dyer is offline
Mod...

Registration Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oregon, MI
Age: 51
 
Posts: 577
Thanks Given to Others: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Karma Power: 46
Karma: 398
Al Dyer is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.Al Dyer is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.Al Dyer is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.Al Dyer is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Al Dyer
Default

Yes,

105-E is very good and there is also a good one in Juran. The important aspect, in my opinion, is that these guidelines and tables can be modified from their original content to work with any company specific situation.

The thing is not where it is from, but if it works.

Great guidelines

Al...
__________________
"Para ... Bellum"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19th June 2003, 05:41 AM
johnnybegood johnnybegood is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Jun 2001
 
Posts: 125
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 37
Karma: 47
johnnybegood has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

How to set or determine the AQL and which inspection level?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19th June 2003, 01:14 PM
howste's Avatar
howste howste is offline
Thaumaturge

Registration Date: May 2003
Location: Utah
 
Posts: 2,416
Thanks Given to Others: 377
Thanked 838 Times in 460 Posts
Karma Power: 206
Karma: 6556
howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by johnnybegood
How to set or determine the AQL and which inspection level?
From MIL-STD-105E page 2:

Quote:
Use of a value of AQL for a certain defect or group of defects indicates that the sampling plan will accept the great majority of the lots or batches provided the process average level of percent defective (or defects per hundred units) in these lots or batches be no greater than the designated value of AQL.
So what you want to do is find the AQL closest to your customer's requested AQL (which is the same as DPHU) of 0.08. The options you have are 0.063 or 0.10. I'd probably play it safe and pick 0.063. You can look at the OC curves in the standard to see if it makes sense.

Normally inspection Level II is used. Other levels can be used depending on the sampling risk.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15th July 2003, 05:51 AM
johnnybegood johnnybegood is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Jun 2001
 
Posts: 125
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 37
Karma: 47
johnnybegood has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Let say my customer does not spell out the dpku goal. Now how do I set a sampling plan then? I really do not know where and how to start.


Quote:
Originally Posted by howste

From MIL-STD-105E page 2:


So what you want to do is find the AQL closest to your customer's requested AQL (which is the same as DPHU) of 0.08. The options you have are 0.063 or 0.10. I'd probably play it safe and pick 0.063. You can look at the OC curves in the standard to see if it makes sense.

Normally inspection Level II is used. Other levels can be used depending on the sampling risk.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15th July 2003, 09:32 AM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline

Registration Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 67
 
Posts: 1,437
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 90
Karma: 1020
Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Default

Food for thought;
If production is already doing the testing and visual inspection, what is the need for an additional QA inspection?
__________________
Sam Goody
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15th July 2003, 08:19 PM
johnnybegood johnnybegood is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Jun 2001
 
Posts: 125
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 37
Karma: 47
johnnybegood has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam

Food for thought;
If production is already doing the testing and visual inspection, what is the need for an additional QA inspection?

call it escapee.......Production may not be testing/visual inspection 100% eventhough they are suppose to do so. Visual inspection are manually human dependent thus defect may skip thru.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Design and Development - Process and Product

Bookmarks

Tags
ansi/asq z1.4, mil-std-105, sampling plan


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Use of sampling plans like MIL-STD-105 E or ANSI Z1.4? AndyN SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 4 15th October 2008 10:35 PM
Acceptable AS9100 Receiving Inspection Sampling Plan - ANSI/ASQCZ1.4 vs. Mil-STD-105E tomstwincam AS9100 Aerospace Standard and Requirements 10 6th November 2007 06:10 PM
AQL for Laymen - ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 - MIL-STD-105 The Fixer AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 18 12th June 2006 08:51 AM
Why '105' and '414' in the military sampling plan standards (Mil-Std-)? cpgonzal Philosophy, Gurus, Controversy and Evolution 1 8th January 2004 02:07 PM



The time now is 11:37 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts