The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 17th June 2003, 10:29 AM
CINDY's Avatar
CINDY CINDY is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Jan 2003
Location: MICHIGAN
 
Posts: 222
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 207
CINDY is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.CINDY is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.CINDY is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.
Default Total Quality Management

Our total quality system (upgraded from QS), includes 16949, 14001, and 17025 for an accredited testing lab.

We just completed our pre-audit for 17025, and still have 16949 and 14001 to go.

It has been six long months in the works.

We are starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel.

Although we are doing well, I think we will come up short with environmental measurements. Can anyone suggest good measurable that we can actually measure.

You should know that we cannot measure waste, power or material usage.

We are measureing our reportable injuries against national, state, and sic code. Currently that is all we are measuring. Even industrial waste (oils and coolants) is not a good measurable for us. our market and job specifications change so fast we could never keep up.

Thanks
Cindy
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 17th June 2003, 10:47 AM
Claes Gefvenberg's Avatar
Claes Gefvenberg Claes Gefvenberg is offline
Forum Administrator

Registration Date: May 2000
Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
Age: 49
 
Posts: 3,771
Thanks Given to Others: 246
Thanked 244 Times in 172 Posts
Blog Entries: 13
Karma Power: 213
Karma: 4951
Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Thumbs up

Hi Cindy,

Wow... Sounds like you've been busy?

Anyway, about environmental measurements: What are your most significant environmental aspects? I suppose that's where you ought to start?

/Claes
__________________
Hanlon's Razor.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
User Groups: Elsmar Cove Cycling Enthusiasts Formula 1 fanatics Photo freaks Readers Corner
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 17th June 2003, 11:08 AM
CINDY's Avatar
CINDY CINDY is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Jan 2003
Location: MICHIGAN
 
Posts: 222
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 207
CINDY is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.CINDY is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.CINDY is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.
Default

Employee safety and health is our most significat aspect within our control.

We have all the lackout/tagout, hazardous communications, MSDS, Spill Prevention plan, Storm Water Pollution Prevention plan, Fire Safety, Safety Audits, etc.

We have had an outside company come in to perform a mock OSHA inspection. We offer free training to all employees for CPR, and perform internal training for Occupational Health and Safety.

We recycle our metal waste and waste oil. Dispose of electronic waste by recycling and proper disposal as well, and have a good machine maintenance program.

It just seems that monitoring safety and injury rates is not enough.

I am leaving something significant out.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17th June 2003, 01:22 PM
Cathy Cathy is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Jun 2003
Location: Northern Ireland
 
Posts: 62
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 31
Karma: 176
Cathy is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.Cathy is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Default

Hi Cindy,

I'm not familiar with environmental policies in the USA, but in Europe, there is a directive coming in for waste management.

I know you said that you cannot measure waste. If you are recycling surely there is something measurable, eg, the total weight of materials going for recycling against the weight of incoming, disposable, non-product/service related material. You would not need to weigh your waste every time, just take a sample, eg on bag of cardboard boxes equals X kg.

Is noise pollution a significant aspect of your business? if so there are aspects of this that can be reduced and controlled. I'm probably coming up which things you have already thought, but justing trying to help We are currenly going for 14001 and these are some of the things we have done.

Your oil and coolant waste could be a measureable. I know you said that it would not be a good measureable. Do you mean that you cannot measure it to the nearest ml or L. In some cases you will not have to measure to the nearest drop, all as you can demonstrate that you are monitoring as best as you can. As long as you have some sort on handle on this waste. You can have an environmental objective to look at best measurement techniques etc.

I am probably going over ground you have covered. Just remember there is some room for manouver as you are within legal limits.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17th June 2003, 02:08 PM
CINDY's Avatar
CINDY CINDY is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Jan 2003
Location: MICHIGAN
 
Posts: 222
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 207
CINDY is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.CINDY is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.CINDY is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.
Default

Cathy,

As far as our waste is concerned, we recycle all used oil (more like dirty water), none of it ends up in a land fill. We only use environmentally safe or less hazardous products so our levels average under 300 ppm.

We recycle our metal (chips and tooling), the amount of material used varies on product and we may have 50 projects going on at once. We monitor scrap and nonconforming material and improve on scrap rates. There is too much receiving material (raw stock) to try to measure against recycled chips.

Our noise levels are well within range and we document the testing.

We have environmental friendly lighting and installed transformers for smother energy.

We have updated computers and office machines that are energy star rated.

So, you see my problem.

Cindy
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17th June 2003, 03:03 PM
LMO LMO is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: May 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
 
Posts: 27
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 31
Karma: 10
LMO has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

CINDY,

The enviromental management system that I was part of implementing.

Even thorugh you are recycling all oil used. Make it a measureable to stay at 100% and track it. Even thorugh non of it ends up in the land fill. Track ppm of waste water and set a goal to improve yearly by 0.5% or 1%. Whatever you can do!

All that ISO 14000 requires you to do is to prove that you meet local, state and federal regulations that you fall under. Just track track these hazardous and non-hazardous materials for your management meetings. Your organization decides how much better then any regulations that you want to be.

Use this data to show how much of your scrap is being recycled and set a goal for next year.
"We recycle our metal (chips and tooling), the amount of material used varies on product and we may have 50 projects going on at once. We monitor scrap and nonconforming material and improve on scrap rates. There is too much receiving material (raw stock) to try to measure against recycled chips."

Here again you have the data, track it and set an improvement goal for next year!

Our noise levels are well within range and we document the testing.

Just meet continuous improvement for this year, what about next year?

We have environmental friendly lighting and installed transformers for smother energy.

Is someone tracking the elctric bill to show a decrease in usage based on the new euipment. (We did. We made everyone trun their computers off when they went home and track the electrical usage decrease.) We set a dollar amount of $5000.00. Just a one time deal but we got the credit.

"We have updated computers and office machines that are energy star rated. "

What have you added for new equipment purchases. Not sure of your industry, but new manufacturing equiupment should require suppliers to improve on noise, electrical usage, safety etc, as a requirement for quoting. If you do not push them to improve in these areas, no one will.

You have a lot of data now that you can track. Even if it is just making sure at 100% of something (Oil, metal scrap) is recycled. Take credit. Not every measurable has to be new.

Only pick a reasonable amount of items to track. What makes since for your organization.

Chuck
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17th June 2003, 03:51 PM
CINDY's Avatar
CINDY CINDY is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Jan 2003
Location: MICHIGAN
 
Posts: 222
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 207
CINDY is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.CINDY is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.CINDY is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.
Default

I guess you are right. It just seems there is little to improve on and I am not looking at opportunities in place. I think I am looking for opportunities that are not there.

Thanks,

Cindy
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 18th June 2003, 12:11 PM
LMO LMO is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: May 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
 
Posts: 27
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 31
Karma: 10
LMO has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Cindy,

You are doing just fine. Take a deep breath. Use the opportunities that are in place. Through internal audits and continual improvements you will find new ones and remove old olds.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by CINDY
[B]I guess you are right. It just seems there is little to improve on and I am not looking at opportunities in place. I think I am looking for opportunities that are not there.

Best of luck,

If I can help in any way, just let me know.


Chuck
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Is TQM (Total Quality Management) Dead? Marc Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 34 21st January 2008 03:17 PM
History of TQM? Where did Total Quality Management come from? greinhold Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 18 4th March 2004 02:40 AM
TPM (Total Productive Manufacturing) vs. TQM (Total Quality Management) vishal Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations 17 3rd March 2004 04:32 PM
Total Quality Management - Is TQM On Your Radar? Marc Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 46 1st December 2003 03:05 PM
ISO 9000 and TQM (Total Quality Management) in Small Companies qualityworld Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 11 26th April 2000 08:40 PM



The time now is 07:29 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts