|
|
 |
|

15th July 2003, 09:50 AM
|
|
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: May 2001
Location: Europe and beyond (aka a nomad!)
Age: 32
|
|
Posts: 89
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 36 Karma: 40 
|
|
Calculating Cpk on a single sided (unilateral) tolerance
Calculating Cpk on a single sided tolerance
Okay I have a diameter that is .250” +0.010” (note there is no minus), how do I calculate Cpk? And is it possible to calculate Cp as I think it is not based on the Cp equation (USL – LSL / 6 standard deviations). In this instance there is only size – plus, and not size plus and minus.
Also, is there an excel formula for the Cpk calculation (if poss)
Best Regards
Lee01
Last edited by lee01; 15th July 2003 at 09:53 AM.
|

15th July 2003, 10:39 AM
|
|
An Early 'Cover'
Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Coast US
|
|
Posts: 1,773
Thanks Given to Others: 24
Thanked 51 Times in 39 Posts
Karma Power: 103
|
|
The issue of Cp and Cpk has been debated a great deal recently. Do a search for more info.
If the spec.is .250" - .260", consider the possibility of using a spec. of .255' +/- .005" for your spec. in calculating Cpk.
__________________
Mike S. ("Gun Nut")
And they ask me why I drink....
|

15th July 2003, 10:42 AM
|
 |
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pune, India
Age: 48
|
|
Posts: 70
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 35 Karma: 58 
|
|
Lee,
In case you have a one sided tolerance (let's say upper tolerance only), the Cpk is evaluated as Cpk upper. Cp is not defined in such cases.
However from what you have written, it does look as though you really have a two sided tolerance. The tolerance is expressed on the plus side only as a convention (like in a hole basic system). Would it be acceptable for instance, if your diameter went below 0.250" ? It could even go to zero if you don't really specify a lower tolerance and the hole or the shaft under consideration would completely vanish.
A two sided Cp/Cpk formula would apply here.
One sided tolerances are typically found in parameters like surface roughness, breaking strength, and form tolerances like straightness, flatness, roundness and cylindricity.
Hope this helps.
Ravi
__________________
If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it.
|

15th July 2003, 10:54 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: Monterrey Mexico
Age: 47
|
|
Posts: 338
Thanks Given to Others: 21
Thanked 84 Times in 59 Posts
Karma Power: 65
|
|
As Mike said "The issue of Cp and Cpk has been debated a great deal recently. Do a search for more info."
In
http://Elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=6410
I posted, that Cpm, or Cpmk are in my opinion better capability index than Cp, Cpk for one sided spec.
The problem that I saw in Cpkl or Cpku for one sided spec is that they don't take the target in account, and "Quality is to the target with the minimum variation".
|
|
Thanks to Darius for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|

16th July 2003, 07:32 AM
|
|
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: May 2001
Location: Europe and beyond (aka a nomad!)
Age: 32
|
|
Posts: 89
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 36 Karma: 40 
|
|
Ravi,
This is a single sided tolerance as the size described is 0.250 + 0.010. This means that obviously it cannot be below the .250 size.
I have been told that there is an equation that takes into consideration the Skewness and Kurtosis to give a value, this value is then used to calculate Cpk.
Help please
Lee01
|

16th July 2003, 07:55 AM
|
 |
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pune, India
Age: 48
|
|
Posts: 70
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 35 Karma: 58 
|
|
Lee,
1. If the size cannot go above 0.260 (0.250 + 0.010), the Upper Spec Limit = 0.260
2. If the size cannot go below 0.250 (as referred by you above), the Lower Spec Limit = 0.250
Any parameter that has both, USL & LSL is to be treated as a two sided tolerance.
To determine Kurtosis and skewness, you will have to look at the histogram. Kurtosis describes the peakedness of the distribution. Skewness describes whether the distribution is lopsided.
If you have to determine the process capability using a Non Normal distribution there are methods to transform the data. You could look up Pearson and Johnson families of distributions for this.
Ravi
__________________
If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it.
|
|
Thanks to Ravi Khare for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|

12th August 2003, 05:36 PM
|
 |
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Jul 2003
Location: River Falls, Wisconsin
Age: 40
|
|
Posts: 121
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Karma Power: 38
|
|
Lee, I think the confusion you're running into is between a single-sided tolerance which has only one direction that it can go, such as speed (i.e. you can never go slower than 0), and a unilateral tolerance, or unevenly distributed tolerance in which you may want the result to be closer to one end than the other, but is still possible to go out of spec on both ends.
To say that the hole size cannot go below .250 is more of a technicality. It can go below .250, but it should not due to design requirements, thus it is a two-sided tolerance with uneven distribution of the tolerance limits.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lee01
Ravi,
This is a single sided tolerance as the size described is 0.250 + 0.010. This means that obviously it cannot be below the .250 size.
I have been told that there is an equation that takes into consideration the Skewness and Kurtosis to give a value, this value is then used to calculate Cpk.
Help please
Lee01
|
|

12th August 2003, 11:36 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
__________________
A Search is a terrible thing to waste!
One Test is Worth 1000 Expert Opinions - The plural of anecdote is not data.
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. - Unknown
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|