The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc.


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 15th July 2003, 09:50 AM
lee01 lee01 is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: May 2001
Location: Europe and beyond (aka a nomad!)
Age: 32
 
Posts: 89
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 36
Karma: 40
lee01 has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Please Help! Calculating Cpk on a single sided (unilateral) tolerance

Calculating Cpk on a single sided tolerance

Okay I have a diameter that is .250” +0.010” (note there is no minus), how do I calculate Cpk? And is it possible to calculate Cp as I think it is not based on the Cp equation (USL – LSL / 6 standard deviations). In this instance there is only size – plus, and not size plus and minus.
Also, is there an excel formula for the Cpk calculation (if poss)


Best Regards

Lee01

Last edited by lee01; 15th July 2003 at 09:53 AM.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 15th July 2003, 10:39 AM
Mike S. Mike S. is offline
An Early 'Cover'

Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Coast US
 
Posts: 1,773
Thanks Given to Others: 24
Thanked 51 Times in 39 Posts
Karma Power: 103
Karma: 1849
Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

The issue of Cp and Cpk has been debated a great deal recently. Do a search for more info.

If the spec.is .250" - .260", consider the possibility of using a spec. of .255' +/- .005" for your spec. in calculating Cpk.
__________________
Mike S. ("Gun Nut")
And they ask me why I drink....
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 15th July 2003, 10:42 AM
Ravi Khare's Avatar
Ravi Khare Ravi Khare is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pune, India
Age: 48
 
Posts: 70
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 35
Karma: 58
Ravi Khare has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Lee,

In case you have a one sided tolerance (let's say upper tolerance only), the Cpk is evaluated as Cpk upper. Cp is not defined in such cases.

However from what you have written, it does look as though you really have a two sided tolerance. The tolerance is expressed on the plus side only as a convention (like in a hole basic system). Would it be acceptable for instance, if your diameter went below 0.250" ? It could even go to zero if you don't really specify a lower tolerance and the hole or the shaft under consideration would completely vanish.
A two sided Cp/Cpk formula would apply here.

One sided tolerances are typically found in parameters like surface roughness, breaking strength, and form tolerances like straightness, flatness, roundness and cylindricity.

Hope this helps.

Ravi
__________________
If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15th July 2003, 10:54 AM
Darius's Avatar
Darius Darius is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: Monterrey Mexico
Age: 47
 
Posts: 338
Thanks Given to Others: 21
Thanked 84 Times in 59 Posts
Karma Power: 65
Karma: 1399
Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.
Default

As Mike said "The issue of Cp and Cpk has been debated a great deal recently. Do a search for more info."

In

http://Elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=6410

I posted, that Cpm, or Cpmk are in my opinion better capability index than Cp, Cpk for one sided spec.

The problem that I saw in Cpkl or Cpku for one sided spec is that they don't take the target in account, and "Quality is to the target with the minimum variation".
Reply With Quote
Thanks to Darius for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  #5  
Old 16th July 2003, 07:32 AM
lee01 lee01 is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: May 2001
Location: Europe and beyond (aka a nomad!)
Age: 32
 
Posts: 89
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 36
Karma: 40
lee01 has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Ravi,

This is a single sided tolerance as the size described is 0.250 + 0.010. This means that obviously it cannot be below the .250 size.

I have been told that there is an equation that takes into consideration the Skewness and Kurtosis to give a value, this value is then used to calculate Cpk.


Help please

Lee01
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16th July 2003, 07:55 AM
Ravi Khare's Avatar
Ravi Khare Ravi Khare is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pune, India
Age: 48
 
Posts: 70
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 35
Karma: 58
Ravi Khare has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Lee,

1. If the size cannot go above 0.260 (0.250 + 0.010), the Upper Spec Limit = 0.260

2. If the size cannot go below 0.250 (as referred by you above), the Lower Spec Limit = 0.250

Any parameter that has both, USL & LSL is to be treated as a two sided tolerance.

To determine Kurtosis and skewness, you will have to look at the histogram. Kurtosis describes the peakedness of the distribution. Skewness describes whether the distribution is lopsided.

If you have to determine the process capability using a Non Normal distribution there are methods to transform the data. You could look up Pearson and Johnson families of distributions for this.

Ravi
__________________
If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it.
Reply With Quote
Thanks to Ravi Khare for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  #7  
Old 12th August 2003, 05:36 PM
Dave Dunn's Avatar
Dave Dunn Dave Dunn is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Jul 2003
Location: River Falls, Wisconsin
Age: 40
 
Posts: 121
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Karma Power: 38
Karma: 535
Dave Dunn is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Dave Dunn is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Dave Dunn is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Dave Dunn is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Dave Dunn is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Dave Dunn is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.
Default

Lee, I think the confusion you're running into is between a single-sided tolerance which has only one direction that it can go, such as speed (i.e. you can never go slower than 0), and a unilateral tolerance, or unevenly distributed tolerance in which you may want the result to be closer to one end than the other, but is still possible to go out of spec on both ends.
To say that the hole size cannot go below .250 is more of a technicality. It can go below .250, but it should not due to design requirements, thus it is a two-sided tolerance with uneven distribution of the tolerance limits.


Quote:
Originally Posted by lee01

Ravi,

This is a single sided tolerance as the size described is 0.250 + 0.010. This means that obviously it cannot be below the .250 size.

I have been told that there is an equation that takes into consideration the Skewness and Kurtosis to give a value, this value is then used to calculate Cpk.


Help please

Lee01
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12th August 2003, 11:36 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11559
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Default

Also see:

http://Elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=1068
http://Elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=1087
__________________
A Search is a terrible thing to waste!
One Test is Worth 1000 Expert Opinions - The plural of anecdote is not data.
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. - Unknown
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc.

Bookmarks

Tags
cpk, single sided tolerance, unilateral tolerance


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Calculating Ppk on a single sided (unilateral) tolerance Lightning546 Student Research Questions - Any Educational Institution 16 2nd November 2009 06:04 PM
S-type Tolerance - Unilateral tolerance where the desired value is 0 (zero) pinpin Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations 3 27th March 2008 04:07 PM
How to complete gage R&R when you have only a single sided tolerance gavinqce Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 14 25th May 2007 01:02 PM
Calculating Tolerance with One Sided Limits - Need a Form to Calculate xochi SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 6 3rd November 2005 08:13 PM
Determining Cpk on a single sided tolerance dimension Stephen Colclough Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 3 8th April 2000 08:25 PM



The time now is 03:42 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts