|
|
 |

26th September 2003, 03:54 AM
|
 |
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected
Registration Date: Aug 2003
Location: CHINA
|
|
Posts: 12
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0 Karma: 10 
|
|
How to Calculate Reliability Acceptance Criteria
help!what is the mean of "P0.90=0.95"? I only know it's a acceptance criterion.How to calculate?
thanks!
nancy chen
|

26th September 2003, 12:32 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
We need to know where this comes from. And, what is it acceptance criteria for?
__________________
A Search is a terrible thing to waste!
One Test is Worth 1000 Expert Opinions - The plural of anecdote is not data.
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. - Unknown
|

26th September 2003, 11:11 PM
|
 |
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected
Registration Date: Aug 2003
Location: CHINA
|
|
Posts: 12
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0 Karma: 10 
|
|
It is a reliability criteria.
I only know that P0.90=0.95 means a minimum reliability of 95% at 90% confidence.How to use the reliability criteria?
|

7th March 2004, 03:19 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
Does this ring a bell with anyone?
__________________
A Search is a terrible thing to waste!
One Test is Worth 1000 Expert Opinions - The plural of anecdote is not data.
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. - Unknown
|

30th April 2004, 08:22 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fremont, California
|
|
Posts: 546
Thanks Given to Others: 13
Thanked 36 Times in 35 Posts
Karma Power: 50
|
|
I will take an attempt.
Area of Engineering:
This falls under the category of estimating reliability at a given confidence interval.
Scenario:
In a real life situations if we perform test for a wear out, we have data like:
Mean time to wearout, Variance of mean time to wearout, sample size, and we may want to know the time we can expect 95% of the units still functioning at 90%confidence.
Calculations:
Assuming this data following a normal distibution. (Wear out period typically follow normal).
The lower 90% confidence limit can be calculated by:
Lower Limit of Mean XL= Mean time to wearout (Xbar)-Z (standard error of mean)
Z=1.282 from table.
(standard error of mean= std.dev of mean time to wearout/squareroot of n)
Now the 95% Lower limit value for reliability is:
X at 95% = XL at 90% -(Z*std.dev of mean time to wearout);Z=1.645 from table.
Applications:
These type of estimations are very useful for setting warranty, setting spares inventory and lifecycle cost estimations.
Useful references:
Reliability Engineering Handbook - Kececioglu Vol 1 & 2.
Regards,
Govind.
|
|
Thanks to Govind for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|