The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Aerospace and Aviation Requirements > AS9100 Aerospace Standard and Requirements


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 14th October 2003, 04:17 PM
peterd's Avatar
peterd peterd is offline
Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Oct 2003
Location: ENGLAND
Age: 34
 
Posts: 14
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 25
Karma: 47
peterd has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question AS9100 Verification of purchases - Metals stockist buying directly from mills

I am in the process of completing preperations for our AS9100 audit and have a query regarding the need to verify purchased product.

We are a aerospace metals stockist buying directly from mills and other stockists. The way I read the requirements we need to do two things that are new:

- check the data within mill certificates against the spec for every delivery
- get samples of the material tested by an outside source on a periodic basis

Am I reading these right or are there ways around this? We are having a bit of an internal debate on this and could do with some views/experience.

Cheers
Peter
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 14th October 2003, 04:32 PM
howste's Avatar
howste howste is offline
Thaumaturge

Registration Date: May 2003
Location: Utah
 
Posts: 2,416
Thanks Given to Others: 377
Thanked 838 Times in 460 Posts
Karma Power: 206
Karma: 6556
howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

The standard says "The organization shall periodically validate test reports for raw material." It doesn't say it has to be through an outside source. If you have the capability to do it inside your company that should be acceptable. If not, I think you're right on the money with your two comments. Of course, you have the ability to determine the frequency of the material testing...
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 14th October 2003, 04:45 PM
BadgerMan's Avatar
BadgerMan BadgerMan is online now
Moderator

Registration Date: Feb 2001
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Age: 48
 
Posts: 483
Thanks Given to Others: 36
Thanked 73 Times in 64 Posts
Karma Power: 64
Karma: 979
BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.BadgerMan is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Default

I also think you have made the correct interpretation. Both of your stated verifications are good practices regardless of whether they are mandatory or not.

We take a sampling of raw materials twice per year and send them to an independent lab. Cheap insurance IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13th March 2005, 08:13 PM
DannyK DannyK is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Jul 2003
Location: CANADA
 
Posts: 318
Thanks Given to Others: 29
Thanked 89 Times in 68 Posts
Karma Power: 50
Karma: 907
DannyK is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.DannyK is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.DannyK is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.DannyK is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.DannyK is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.DannyK is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.DannyK is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.DannyK is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Default Validating test reports for raw material

I understand the requirement(AS9100, 7.4.3) for validating raw material periodically. For metals it is straightforward.

Would it also apply to paint for a paint shop or chemicals for an anodizing processor?

How about resin for a plastics manufacturer?

Any comments?

Danny
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14th March 2005, 04:10 PM
Sidney Vianna's Avatar
Sidney Vianna Sidney Vianna is offline
Post responsibly

Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: Long Beach, CA - USofA
 
Posts: 4,951
Thanks Given to Others: 688
Thanked 1,912 Times in 1,083 Posts
Karma Power: 467
Karma: 16797
Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DannyK

I understand the requirement(AS9100, 7.4.3) for validating raw material periodically. For metals it is straightforward.

Would it also apply to paint for a paint shop or chemicals for an anodizing processor?

How about resin for a plastics manufacturer?

Any comments?

Danny
If you rely on a CoC to accept the material, then yes. If you don't require a CoC to base your acceptance of the incoming product, then no. Another issue that might apply to the products you mentioned is their "shelf life" .
__________________
Fighting organizational dysfunction, one post at a time.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14th March 2005, 06:01 PM
Jeff Frost Jeff Frost is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: May 2004
Location: Orange County, California
 
Posts: 383
Thanks Given to Others: 69
Thanked 125 Times in 94 Posts
Karma Power: 46
Karma: 806
Jeff Frost is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Jeff Frost is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Jeff Frost is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Jeff Frost is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Jeff Frost is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Jeff Frost is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Jeff Frost is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.
Default

Yes resin would fall under this clause. Raw material could encompass any unfinished materials purchased to a specification not just metal or plastic.

Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14th September 2005, 04:20 PM
Hoeyster's Avatar
Hoeyster Hoeyster is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Jul 2005
Location: Illinois
 
Posts: 49
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 18
Karma: 10
Hoeyster has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

This might be a stupid question but when it says periodic validation of test results for raw material, does that mean a chemical analysis or just a hardness check?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Aerospace and Aviation Requirements > AS9100 Aerospace Standard and Requirements

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
AS9100 Clause 7.4.3 Verification of Purchased Product (audit Finding) J Allen AS9100 Aerospace Standard and Requirements 29 29th January 2009 12:11 AM
Meeting AS9100 Clause 7.4.3 e) Delegation of Verification requirements tomstwincam AS9100 Aerospace Standard and Requirements 18 16th December 2008 03:28 PM
Chemical Bonding vs. Human Bonding (men = metals, so women = non-metals) Tim Folkerts Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 1 7th November 2005 04:27 PM
AS/EN/SJAC AS9120 - Aerospace Requirements for Stockist Distributors - Now available Sidney Vianna AS9100 Aerospace Standard and Requirements 1 29th January 2003 04:25 PM
Ford's Second Tier Reporting Program for MBE Purchases Marc Customer and Company Specific Requirements 0 20th September 2001 07:03 PM



The time now is 08:43 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts