The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 19011 and ALL Auditing Discussions > Process Audits and Layered Process Audits


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 4.00 average. Display Modes
  #1  
Old 20th October 2003, 09:34 AM
Gman2's Avatar
Gman2 Gman2 is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Aug 2003
Location: Michigan
Age: 38
 
Posts: 51
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 27
Karma: 10
Gman2 has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default Someone PLEASE find me this "Shall" on "Process Audits"

I am still being hung up on this process audit NC.
The original write up was 1) The existing audit schedule is based upon the 1994 standard, and does not yet reflect the ISO 9001-2000 process-based approach. 2) No evidence of internal audit plans or reports performed to verify system compliance to the ISO 9001-2000 requirements.
We got a major on this and since the write up I have performed an internal audit to verify our compliance to the new standard. That all went good, we found some problems, wrote them up and are working on fixing them.
But this did not satisfy our auditor.
He is now asking for evidence that we have scheduled and performed "process audits" meaninig they are totally 2 diferent things.
A process audit being specific to problem area or area of concern.
These can be generated from customer complaints, returns, scrap, ect..
And he said the new standard refers to them specifically as "process audits".
Meaning seperate audits althgether and in addition to the required Internal Audits.
I just can't seem to find this anywhere where it states we shall schedule and performs these mini process audits.
Has anyone else had to deal with this?
This is my 2nd company to be registered 2000 and with my last company I never had any problems with audits.

G.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 20th October 2003, 09:50 AM
db's Avatar
db db is offline
Where's the shall?

Registration Date: Jul 2001
Location: Plymouth, MI
Age: 53
 
Posts: 2,202
Thanks Given to Others: 208
Thanked 166 Times in 128 Posts
Karma Power: 129
Karma: 2579
db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

About the closest I can find is: "An audit programme shall be planned, taking into consieration the status and importance of the processes and areas..." I think there is some direction in the rules for registrars, but I am not sure.

One way I would approach this is to ask for the "shall". Have the auditor show exactly where the requirment comes from. It might be a contractual thing between you and the registrar.
__________________
Dave B (the other Dave)
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 20th October 2003, 09:57 AM
Bigfoot's Avatar
Bigfoot Bigfoot is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indiana
 
Posts: 192
Thanks Given to Others: 18
Thanked 34 Times in 16 Posts
Karma Power: 37
Karma: 498
Bigfoot is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.Bigfoot is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.Bigfoot is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.Bigfoot is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.Bigfoot is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.
Default

I'm an automotive supplier and the confusion may be interpreting the ISO/TS 16949 specification under section 8.2.2.2 Manufacturing Process Audit. "The organization shall audit each manufacturing process to determine its effectiveness. If you are in automotive you need to show evidence of addressing this, but I think, (bearing in mind it is early on Monday morning) , it is automotive specific.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20th October 2003, 10:01 AM
Claes Gefvenberg's Avatar
Claes Gefvenberg Claes Gefvenberg is offline
Forum Administrator

Registration Date: May 2000
Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
Age: 49
 
Posts: 3,771
Thanks Given to Others: 246
Thanked 244 Times in 172 Posts
Blog Entries: 13
Karma Power: 213
Karma: 4951
Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gman2

But this did not satisfy our auditor.
He is now asking for evidence that we have scheduled and performed "process audits" meaninig they are totally 2 diferent things.
A process audit being specific to problem area or area of concern.
These can be generated from customer complaints, returns, scrap, ect..
----
Has anyone else had to deal with this?

G.
One single question: What clause did your auditor refer to? I can find no such requirement in ISO 9001:2000. Personally, I think your auditor is on a wild goose chase.

Over to the group.

/Claes

P.s. Bigfoot, welcome to the Cove.
__________________
Hanlon's Razor.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
User Groups: Elsmar Cove Cycling Enthusiasts Formula 1 fanatics Photo freaks Readers Corner

Last edited by Claes Gefvenberg; 20th October 2003 at 10:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20th October 2003, 10:05 AM
Gman2's Avatar
Gman2 Gman2 is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Aug 2003
Location: Michigan
Age: 38
 
Posts: 51
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 27
Karma: 10
Gman2 has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

It was written up under 8.2.2

How about that note at the bottom of the clause?
Also what about when it references 7.1?

I have looked at 7.1 but have not seen anything jump out at me.

I am about to raise the BS flag about this but I want to be sure.


G.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20th October 2003, 10:21 AM
ben sortin ben sortin is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Oct 2003
Location: ohio
 
Posts: 59
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 28
Karma: 110
ben sortin is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.ben sortin is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Default

The process audits are a subset of your internal audits. Audit processes where you add value to your product or service. You only have to fix the system if numerous processes are signaling problems. Start with a process that is well mapped like your manufacturing process design output (7.3.3.2) on your highest volume job.
__________________
Does the part spin?

Ben Sortin
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20th October 2003, 10:22 AM
Claes Gefvenberg's Avatar
Claes Gefvenberg Claes Gefvenberg is offline
Forum Administrator

Registration Date: May 2000
Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
Age: 49
 
Posts: 3,771
Thanks Given to Others: 246
Thanked 244 Times in 172 Posts
Blog Entries: 13
Karma Power: 213
Karma: 4951
Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gman2

It was written up under 8.2.2

How about that note at the bottom of the clause?
Also what about when it references 7.1?

I have looked at 7.1 but have not seen anything jump out at me.

I am about to raise the BS flag about this but I want to be sure.


G.
Forget the note: The standards referred to have been replaced by ISO19011:2002, Guidance for quality and/or environmental management systems auditing, and 7.1 has (IMO) nothing to do with it (except from the need to audit what you have planned acc. to 7.1).

I think your auditor has managed to mix things up in a grand way.

/Claes
__________________
Hanlon's Razor.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
User Groups: Elsmar Cove Cycling Enthusiasts Formula 1 fanatics Photo freaks Readers Corner
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20th October 2003, 10:28 AM
Al Rosen's Avatar
Al Rosen Al Rosen is offline
Forum Moderator

Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lawn Guyland
Age: 59
 
Posts: 3,101
Thanks Given to Others: 48
Thanked 390 Times in 272 Posts
Karma Power: 192
Karma: 4968
Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Al Rosen
Default

See Iso 9004, Guidelines for performance improvements

Para. 8.2.2, Measurement and monitoring of processes.
__________________
Al
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 19011 and ALL Auditing Discussions > Process Audits and Layered Process Audits

Bookmarks

Tags
iso 9001, process audits


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
ISO/TS 16949 "Certification" & "Product and Process Design" Clauses YHHTT ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5 1st November 2009 05:08 PM
How to document Internal Audits done via the "Process Audit" methodology Casana Internal Auditing 9 22nd December 2008 10:56 PM
ISO 9001:2000 7.3.5 "Verification" and 7.3.6 "Validation"- Clarification JkelleyCDS ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 29 19th August 2008 12:14 AM
How to "link" normal process variation and "triggers" for Internal CAs? Chrisqa Nonconformance and Corrective Action 6 12th October 2005 06:42 AM
Audit Definition in ISO 9000:2000 includes "documented process"? lou hannigan ISO 19011 and ALL Auditing Discussions 2 31st December 2001 12:42 PM



The time now is 06:23 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts