The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc.
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

How much does Cpk > 1.33 represent in precentage of good pieces?


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links



Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

Atul's
Quality Forum Online

Howard's
International Quality Services

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum

Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Related LinkedIn Groups

ISO 9001 for Small Businesses

ISO 9001:2015 Revision Discussions

Information Security Community

Medical Devices Group

Quality and Regulatory Network

FDA (Food and Drugs)

AS91XX Series - Tips and Advice

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 4th November 2003, 07:47 PM
tattva

 
 
Total Posts: 46
Cpk

Hi all!

Could someone help me with the following:

How much does CPK>1.33 represent in precentage of good pieces? Is there a matrix where I can find these values at Cpk>1; Cpk>1.67; Cpk<1; Cpk=0?

Thanks in advance!

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 4th November 2003, 08:30 PM
howste's Avatar
howste

 
 
Total Posts: 4,186
I've only got a minute before I've got to go, so I'll just get you started...

First, in order for the statistics to be meaningful, you need to have a normal process that is in control. Now, the percentage can actually be different depending on if the distribution is centered or not. A perfectly centered process with Cpk = 1 will have twice as much (theoretical) nonconforming product as one with a Cpk = 1 that is not close to being centered.

What you need to get the percentages is the Z value(s) and a "standard normal" table to look up the results. When you look at the formulas you find that basically Z = 3xCpk.

I'm attaching a standard normal table - hopefully you can figure it out from here. If not I'll be back later...
Attached Files: 1. Scan for viruses before using, 2. Please report any 'bad' files by Reporting this post, 3. Use at your Own Risk.
File Type: xls Standard Normal Table.xls (55.5 KB, 634 views)
Thanks to howste for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 5th November 2003, 07:19 AM
Howard Atkins's Avatar
Howard Atkins

 
 
Total Posts: 2,920
Here is a very clear article with a table of the results
http://www.symphonytech.com/feature.htm

article Measuring Your Process Capability
  Post Number #4  
Old 5th November 2003, 12:23 PM
howste's Avatar
howste

 
 
Total Posts: 4,186
Great link, Howard. I was trying to explain how a watch works, when all Tattva asked for was the time...
  Post Number #5  
Old 5th November 2003, 12:47 PM
Darius's Avatar
Darius

 
 
Total Posts: 551
Howard, it's a great link, tanks for the tip

For the ppm to Cpk question, both articles, Capability and Six Sigma look like a check mate (no more can be told).

From Six Sigma article (in Howard's link)

Cpk =0.8406+(29.37-LN(ppm)*2.221)^0.5

or

ppm = EXP(-((Cpk-0.8406)^2-29.37)/2.221)

But keep on mind what Don Wheeler said in te point 8.4 from Advanced Topics in Statistical Process Control, 1995.
Quote:
"It's impossible to convert a capability ratio into a fraction of nonconforming product without using some probability dsitribution in the convertion... of course
, the traditional assumption is that the data are normally distributed.... in most cases the uncertainty in the fraction nonconforming will be greater than the refinement offered by such convertion"
  Post Number #6  
Old 5th November 2003, 01:26 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam

 
 
Total Posts: 1,444
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by tattva

Hi all!

Could someone help me with the following:

How much does CPK>1.33 represent in precentage of good pieces? Is there a matrix where I can find these values at Cpk>1; Cpk>1.67; Cpk<1; Cpk=0?

Thanks in advance!
I'm going to step out on a limb and say that Cpk, in and of itself, will not tell you how many good parts you have. Cpk only measures process centering.

Case in point; I have a process that has a Cpk= .8 , Cp = 1.66, Zmin = 2.386, Spec avg = .125, Process avg = .1197
There are zero nonconforming parts. All data entered was within spec.

Using the Z-value would show a "potential" for approx. .85% nonconforming.
When I want to relate percent defective to number of parts I use PPM.
  Post Number #7  
Old 5th November 2003, 01:41 PM
howste's Avatar
howste

 
 
Total Posts: 4,186
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Sam

I'm going to step out on a limb and say that Cpk, in and of itself, will not tell you how many good parts you have. Cpk only measures process centering.

Case in point; I have a process that has a Cpk= .8 , Cp = 1.66, Zmin = 2.386, Spec avg = .125, Process avg = .1197
There are zero nonconforming parts. All data entered was within spec.

Using the Z-value would show a "potential" for approx. .85% nonconforming.
When I want to relate percent defective to number of parts I use PPM.
The usefulness of statistics comes from measuring samples and then making inferences about the population. My question is (assuming the process is normal and in control), did you measure every part in the population? If not, then I would guess you really do have nonconforming product, you just didn't happen to find it in the samples you took.
  Post Number #8  
Old 5th November 2003, 03:29 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam

 
 
Total Posts: 1,444
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by howste

The usefulness of statistics comes from measuring samples and then making inferences about the population. My question is (assuming the process is normal and in control), did you measure every part in the population? If not, then I would guess you really do have nonconforming product, you just didn't happen to find it in the samples you took.

I think that's what I inferred in my response when I said the reaults of the Z-value provided the "potential" nonconformances.
In response to Tattvas' question "can Cpk be related to Nonconformances"? I said no, and I stick wth that.
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc.

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
VSM: Between OP1 and OP2 there is a big conveyor. How to represent that on VSM?? amiuda Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 6 14th November 2014 06:36 PM
P Values - In understandable terms what does the P Value represent? cpine APQP and PPAP 23 25th April 2013 04:42 PM
Why evaluate Suppliers that are Brands we represent? totty ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions 19 15th March 2013 01:05 PM
Could IMDS Represent the SoC Free Test Report? ignatiuswong RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 6 20th November 2007 01:52 PM
What Does This Represent to You? Marc Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 16 2nd August 2006 01:49 PM



The time now is 08:56 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies" -- The Elsmar Cove is *Copyright Free*.
A Peachfarm LLC Internet Property