|
|
 |
|

5th January 2004, 08:47 AM
|
 |
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Netherlands
|
|
Posts: 6
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 26 Karma: 10 
|
|
Moving to another location: Consequences for your Quality Manual
Good day everybody and I would like to wish everybody a happy and healthy new year!
I would like to bring up a new discussion: what do you do as a Quality manager when your organization is going to move to another location?
I think that a lot of documents can stay the same (like document control, internl audits etc...), but for some aspects of the quality manual, things will change dramatically.
Does anyone have experience in this manner?
Sander
|

5th January 2004, 09:18 AM
|
|
|
For instance?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mr. veen
I would like to bring up a new discussion: what do you do as a Quality manager when your organization is going to move to another location?
I think that a lot of documents can stay the same (like document control, internl audits etc...), but for some aspects of the quality manual, things will change dramatically.
Does anyone have experience in this manner?
Sander
|
Veen,
What would change? Do you have the traditional manual with company history, location, etc.? If that's the only concern, it's minor editing. Your manual is an overview and shouldn't change because you moved. I would be more concerned about those documents that contain processes that are changed because of the new location. Offhand, I can't think of any that would. I would think that the selection of this new facility was with existing processes in mind. Think about what has really changed, beside your parking place.
|

5th January 2004, 11:43 AM
|
 |
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: May 2003
Location: Michigan, USA
|
|
Posts: 158
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 36 Times in 27 Posts
Karma Power: 34
|
|
I have gone through this (last spring), and the only changes that were an issue were where the processes had changed due to some reorganization of our press lines and responsibilities. It really wasn't that big of a deal.
I did, however, take the move as an opportunity to "reintroduce" our QMS...
__________________
bibbity, bobbity, boo
Last edited by Mustang; 5th January 2004 at 11:44 AM.
Reason: too much use of "issue"!
|

5th January 2004, 11:54 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Feb 2003
Location: Marion, IN USA
Age: 57
|
|
Posts: 514
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 13 Posts
Karma Power: 66
|
|
I would think that this would be a topic for discussion in your Management Review at the very least (refer to ISO 9001 5.6.2f). The resultant decision may be that there should be no to minimal impact (per your comments expressed here), but at least there should be records to demonstrate that management took the opportunity to make this evaluation.
__________________
David D. Hartman
|

5th January 2004, 01:35 PM
|
 |
Forum Administrator
Registration Date: May 2000
Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
Age: 49
|
|
Posts: 3,771
Thanks Given to Others: 246
Thanked 244 Times in 172 Posts
Karma Power: 213
|
|
I will agree with the previous replys, with the added comment that a "thin" manual like ours poses no problems at all. I would have to edit the address, phone no. and things like that. Nothing more.
A question to mr veen. When you say that "some aspects of the quality manual, things will change dramatically": What are those? Maybe we can give you better advice if we know.
Btw, I'm about to update our manual due to a changed company name. The same goes there. Only minor changes, but just like Mustang, I will use the opportunity to promote the QMS.
/Claes
|

5th January 2004, 02:08 PM
|
 |
QA-LA
Registration Date: Jan 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Age: 39
|
|
Posts: 897
Thanks Given to Others: 5
Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
Karma Power: 71
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mr. veen
Good day everybody and I would like to wish everybody a happy and healthy new year!
I would like to bring up a new discussion: what do you do as a Quality manager when your organization is going to move to another location?
I think that a lot of documents can stay the same (like document control, internl audits etc...), but for some aspects of the quality manual, things will change dramatically.
Does anyone have experience in this manner?
Sander
|
I would agree that almost all of your procedures will remain the same with the exception of some minor administrative changes. I am not sure what type of business you are in but if you are moving equipment you will want to make sure that before you start running your line that the equipment is operating as intended and is putting of good product.
|

5th January 2004, 05:11 PM
|
 |
Metal Bob
Registration Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bourbonnais, IL - South of Chicago
Age: 36
|
|
Posts: 351
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 45
|
|
The only major head I can think of is forms/paperwork/procedures that include the old address like accounts payable and receivable. And depending on the type of business (distrubution vs. manufacturing) this could be a big headache!
__________________
What exactly am I signing for here? Where's the packing list? PO? Customer Requirements? - Want to play some Xbox360 on Live?
|

6th January 2004, 03:36 PM
|
 |
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Sep 2003
Location: ABERDEEN, SCOTLAND UK
|
|
Posts: 303
Thanks Given to Others: 5
Thanked 57 Times in 43 Posts
Karma Power: 48
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ISO GUY
I would agree that almost all of your procedures will remain the same with the exception of some minor administrative changes. I am not sure what type of business you are in but if you are moving equipment you will want to make sure that before you start running your line that the equipment is operating as intended and is putting of good product.
|
Mr Veen
Even more to the point perhaps - I expect that almost all your processes will remain the same, and if you have managed to avoid a "separate" quality manual (can anyone tell me who benefits from its production as set out in the standard?) then your entire "quality system" should not need to change if you have based your (management) system on a description of your processes. The same applies if you operate from more than 1 location - describe how the job gets done, and refine your process descriptions to identify any variations due to site-specific requirements.
__________________
Peter
"Insight through Clarity"
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|