|
|
 |
|

29th January 2004, 11:50 PM
|
 |
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Nov 2003
Location: Winnipeg MB
Age: 36
|
|
Posts: 35
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 26 Karma: 96 
|
|
Major vs. Minor Nonconformance (Finding) - Difference and Definition
The question here: Practically, what is the primary difference between a major and minor non-conformance?
I can give the formal answers, may lots of words. But what is the most practical answer?
All experts here, any expertise?
Also, what is the best effective corrective action steps? 8D, or something else?
|

30th January 2004, 12:55 AM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
Some Links
__________________
A Search is a terrible thing to waste!
One Test is Worth 1000 Expert Opinions - The plural of anecdote is not data.
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. - Unknown
|

30th January 2004, 08:48 AM
|
 |
Mod...
Registration Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oregon, MI
Age: 51
|
|
Posts: 577
Thanks Given to Others: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Karma Power: 46
|
|
Agree with Cleas's opinion that not discriminating between "major" and "minor" is the way to go. And with Barb in that internally, it is acceptable to define the terms yourself.
I myself also believe that the difference is too subjective to be unitarily defined in a manner that would really help and not just cause more banter on interpretation.
As an example, if I was auditing corrective actions and found 1 report had not been completed per procedure I would consider it a minor infraction. If I found multiple instances I would believe the system is broken and in need of "major" repair. Both would still require some type of corrective action.
Al...
__________________
"Para ... Bellum"
|

30th January 2004, 10:21 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Feb 2003
Location: Marion, IN USA
Age: 57
|
|
Posts: 514
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 13 Posts
Karma Power: 66
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Al Dyer
As an example, if I was auditing corrective actions and found 1 report had not been completed per procedure I would consider it a minor infraction. If I found multiple instances I would believe the system is broken and in need of "major" repair. Both would still require some type of corrective action.
Al...
|
Yes, but would they both require "root cause" corrective action? Herein is where we define the differences: A "minor" nonconformity - single incident (no impact on overall product conformity, or personnel health and safety) - Correction of the nonconformity is required, but no requirement for "root cause" corrective action. Example: A trained operator, with a current process before them, makes one error (misspelled word, a single paint run, a non-critical screw tightened to 20 in/oz in-lieu of the required 18 in/oz, etc.) out of numerous opportunities. The error is documented, root cause is determined as a single operator error, and the error/nonconformity is corrected. No further action is required.
A "major" nonconformity defined as either multiple/recurring "minor" incidents, or nonconformities that impact product quality/performance or personnel health and/or safety - requires full 8D process.
__________________
David D. Hartman
|

30th January 2004, 01:37 PM
|
 |
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
|
|
Posts: 417
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 50
|
|
I think designating some findings "major" is a useful tool. Around here at least it gets people's attention. To my thinking, which admittedly is lacking on a Friday, a minor is exactly what was pointed out earlier - a single infraction among a crowd of compliances. An oversight. A major is a cluster (excuse the reference) - a group of all the same kind of findings across several areas OR a major breakdown of the system somewhere - something that is CLEARLY required and someone clearly knew they were supposed to be doing it and just didn't. In those cases I don't mind putting a "MAJOR" on it because it often serves as a wake-up call.
|

30th January 2004, 04:02 PM
|
|
|
Familiar Road
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ddhartma
Example: A trained operator, with a current process before them, makes one error (misspelled word, a single paint run, a non-critical screw tightened to 20 in/oz in-lieu of the required 18 in/oz, etc.) out of numerous opportunities. The error is documented, root cause is determined as a single operator error, and the error/nonconformity is corrected. No further action is required.
|
Rut Roe....I can't believe my tired ole eyes. It's the system...It just has to be. Operator Error is totally unacceptable. Shame! Y'all have a nice weekend.
|

30th January 2004, 04:54 PM
|
 |
Mod...
Registration Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oregon, MI
Age: 51
|
|
Posts: 577
Thanks Given to Others: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Karma Power: 46
|
|
Corrective action for the root cause:
Fire all the operators and the people that wrote the procedures. Save only those management personnel that dis-avow all knowledge of the system as it is. If they were informed, it would be different!!!!
Al...
__________________
"Para ... Bellum"
|

31st January 2004, 10:17 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Greenwood (Ft Smith area), Arkansas, USA
Age: 58
|
|
Posts: 6,224
Thanks Given to Others: 33
Thanked 1,248 Times in 807 Posts
Karma Power: 397
|
|
Minor = Oops!
Major = Aw #&*%@(&)!!!!
Kinda what I've heard a time or two when I've found them
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|