The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11th February 2004, 06:36 PM
carol carol is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Sep 2002
Location: Milwaukee, WI
 
Posts: 1
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 30
Karma: 10
carol has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default New company - how much history required?

I am working with a small company that is being required to be TS 16949 certified. I was told by a Registrar's representative that they require 12 months of "data" in order to be qualified for registration. The company is quite new and has never been registered before. They have no formal quality systems in place. In the last year and 1/2 it has grown from 3 to 10 full time employees, plus 30 temps.

The company has about 1 to 2 years of process data, PPAP's, CP's, etc., but OEM has been working with this company to develop the production process. The OEM SQE's were assembling the APQP/PPAP documentation with data collected and working with the company's employees.

I am trying to get clarification from the registrar on what "data" and the time frame, but I was wondering if anyone else has come across this "requirement". I've worked on several QS implementations and it was never an issue.

Carol

Last edited by carol; 11th February 2004 at 06:39 PM.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 11th February 2004, 06:48 PM
howste's Avatar
howste howste is online now
Thaumaturge

Registration Date: May 2003
Location: Utah
 
Posts: 2,417
Thanks Given to Others: 377
Thanked 838 Times in 460 Posts
Karma Power: 206
Karma: 6556
howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.howste is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

The "IATF Guidance to ISO/TS 16949:2002" document has a list of things required to be submitted to the registrar before the registration audit. It includes (among other things):

Key indicators trends (last 12 months):
- Customer satisfaction
- Employee motivation or awareness
- Product realization processes
- Supplier performance
Internal audit results and action plans (last 12 months)
Management review results (last 12 months)
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 12th February 2004, 10:16 AM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline

Registration Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 67
 
Posts: 1,437
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 90
Karma: 1020
Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Default

From IAOB Web site.

5. Less than 12 months Performance Data
Question: How can a Site working towards ISO/TS 16949:2002 show 12 months performance data?
Answer: For an established facility the last 12 months performance data should be provided against the products in production and the QMS being used.

Note: In the case of a new facility the audit should be conducted once ISO/TS 16949:2002 QMS compliance is established the Certification Body is permitted to issue a letter of conformance. After 12 months production, when performance data is verified, the Certification process can proceed.
__________________
Sam Goody
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12th February 2004, 02:28 PM
db's Avatar
db db is offline
Where's the shall?

Registration Date: Jul 2001
Location: Plymouth, MI
Age: 53
 
Posts: 2,202
Thanks Given to Others: 208
Thanked 166 Times in 128 Posts
Karma Power: 129
Karma: 2579
db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

Carol, Welcome to the cove

Sam and howste have it pegged right. Some registrars will register you to ISO 9001:2000 for the first year, and show compliance to TS, then once you have the appropriate supporting data, they will then add the TS.

Check with your customer. They should allow you operate for the year, but it will be their call. Let us know how things turn out.
__________________
Dave B (the other Dave)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Quality Records - Retention and Required Controls Tom W Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 8 26th September 2007 01:08 PM
ISO 13485 - Part 11: Electronic Records - Small Biotech Company - What is required? dauclair Medical Devices (21 CFR part 820) 6 10th February 2005 03:53 PM
What are the minimum quality records required by QS-9000? nick1980 Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 1 20th December 2004 02:43 AM
ISO 14000 - Required Quality Records lcriscoe Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 2 5th May 2000 11:29 AM
Control of Quality Records - What are the quality records required by QS-9000? Rea Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 3 19th April 2000 07:59 PM



The time now is 11:38 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts