|
|
 |
|

27th February 2004, 09:27 AM
|
 |
Dogs rule
Registration Date: Jul 2002
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 56
|
|
Posts: 980
Thanks Given to Others: 15
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Karma Power: 69
|
|
US Automotive Mfg. Performance
Here's a little ditty from the March Quality Digest written by James Harrington. Once again, I don't know if it's accessible if you are not a subscriber, so if most of you can't view this, please let me know and I'll quit posting the links.
http://www.qualitydigest.com/current...rrington.shtml
Discussion????
Bill
__________________
There is no psychiatrist in the world like a puppy licking your face. - Ben Williams
|

27th February 2004, 09:57 AM
|
 |
Forum Administrator
Registration Date: Jul 1997
Location: Revivim, Israel
|
|
Posts: 2,412
Thanks Given to Others: 100
Thanked 448 Times in 253 Posts
Karma Power: 195
|
|
Just to tell you that it is visible to all. Keep on posting
The discussion later!
|

27th February 2004, 10:14 AM
|
|
Been around a while
Registration Date: Jan 2002
Location: Southeastern USA
|
|
Posts: 1,996
Thanks Given to Others: 283
Thanked 267 Times in 212 Posts
Karma Power: 171
|
|
Ok, I am not from the automotive industry, but have been a "car guy" for as long as I can remember, and am a sometime drag racer and autocrosser.
Where are the disconnects? It seems to me, from this forum, that the big 3 (particularly Ford?) are difficult to work with. Is it possible that the system is built around satisfying itself, instead of the customers?
As far as quality of design goes, the number of highly-focused choices offered the consumer today are mind-boggling, and some of the choices even are good at more than one thing (witness the SUV/Pickup, for example).
But, the article Bill gave us cites the number of defects per car. Even Lexus has more than 1. I wonder how the defects/car correlates with overall satisfaction? And, how often are these defects related to design, and how often are they related to the odd badly-formed part or missed assembly step?
Auto folks, I really am interested in your opinions on this...
Craig
|

27th February 2004, 10:18 AM
|
 |
Registration Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 67
|
|
Posts: 1,437
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 90
|
|
This article compares to the same articles published in the 80's at the on-set of TQM. It is scary to think that with all the emphasis we place on standards and specifications related to quality that, in the past 25 years we have not improved; either in the the market place or in the quality of product.
With TS2,we have only just begun, but stick around, there is another blip on the screen.
__________________
Sam Goody
|

27th February 2004, 10:40 AM
|
 |
Enginerd
Registration Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 29
|
|
Posts: 253
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 37
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sam
This article compares to the same articles published in the 80's at the on-set of TQM. It is scary to think that with all the emphasis we place on standards and specifications related to quality that, in the past 25 years we have not improved; either in the the market place or in the quality of product.
|
(I'm not in automotive either...but have been in the past.)
I had a conversation with my boyfriend not too long ago about this - I was trying to explain to him exactly what QS was all about and where it came from. (He's in urban planning, and so doesn't get much exposure to ISO stuff.) Anyway, it came up b/c he's currently car-shopping...and had crossed domestic cars off the list (as in, he didn't even look at any).
It really *is* scary to think of the efforts that North America puts into quality, with all of the standards and specs...yet despite all that, he'll *still* be driving his new Honda off the lot this afternoon. What are we doing wrong?
__________________
-Rachel
"Why should I be the one to change my name? He's the one who sucks!"
-Michael Bolton, Office Space
|

27th February 2004, 10:56 AM
|
 |
Forum Moderator
Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lawn Guyland
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 3,102
Thanks Given to Others: 48
Thanked 390 Times in 272 Posts
Karma Power: 192
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rachel
(I'm not in automotive either...but have been in the past.)
I had a conversation with my boyfriend not too long ago about this - I was trying to explain to him exactly what QS was all about and where it came from. (He's in urban planning, and so doesn't get much exposure to ISO stuff.) Anyway, it came up b/c he's currently car-shopping...and had crossed domestic cars off the list (as in, he didn't even look at any).
It really *is* scary to think of the efforts that North America puts into quality, with all of the standards and specs...yet despite all that, he'll *still* be driving his new Honda off the lot this afternoon. What are we doing wrong?
|
Rachel, your boyfriend may be surprised to find out that his Honda was made in the US. I don't know if they make them in Canada. I once bought an Olds made in Canada.
__________________
Al
|

27th February 2004, 11:07 AM
|
 |
Enginerd
Registration Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 29
|
|
Posts: 253
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 37
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Al Rosen
Rachel, your boyfriend may be surprised to find out that his Honda was made in the US. I don't know if they make them in Canada. I once bought an Olds made in Canada.
|
Are they not designed overseas, though? I know there's an assembly plant in Alliston (north of Toronto) but the designs originate from overseas, do they not?
In any event - even though they are assembled in Canada - why the discrepancies in ratings?
__________________
-Rachel
"Why should I be the one to change my name? He's the one who sucks!"
-Michael Bolton, Office Space
|

27th February 2004, 11:59 AM
|
 |
Post responsibly
Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: Long Beach, CA - USofA
|
|
Posts: 4,951
Thanks Given to Others: 688
Thanked 1,912 Times in 1,083 Posts
Karma Power: 467
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sam
This article compares to the same articles published in the 80's at the on-set of TQM. It is scary to think that with all the emphasis we place on standards and specifications related to quality that, in the past 25 years we have not improved; either in the the market place or in the quality of product.
With TS2,we have only just begun, but stick around, there is another blip on the screen.
|
Sam, I beg to differ. I believe that the American Automotive Industry is much better now, than it was 20 years ago. However, quality is a moving target as we all know. The Japanese Automotive Industry, especially, due to cultural issues drive continual improvement FASTER than others.
Check http://www.toyota.co.jp/en/special/tps/tps.html
__________________
Fighting organizational dysfunction, one post at a time.
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|