|
|
 |
|

18th March 2004, 08:39 AM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dominican Republic
|
|
Posts: 44
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Karma Power: 25
|
|
Triggering point when to dispose quality records
Our procedure said before that customer documents are retained after two years, and be dispose afterwards. I've notice that it failed to indicate the "from when". So what we did was, we added the "from obsolete/inactive date" and we have now a stamp that will tell you when it was obsoleted. My concern now is that we have lots of obsolete documents in our history files that haven't dispose yet because there's no date indicated there. I planned to traceback the current revision date of those documents but there's nothing there but the approval date of the customer, but on when we actually received the document, it was not indicated. What do you suggest to do about those documents which obviously old, ranging from 4 to 10 years old, from customer revision date)?
Thanks again for the support and inputs.
|

18th March 2004, 10:21 AM
|
|
An Early 'Cover'
Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Coast US
|
|
Posts: 1,773
Thanks Given to Others: 24
Thanked 51 Times in 39 Posts
Karma Power: 103
|
|
Here is what I'd do: If you know the documents are obsolete and you know they are over 2 years old (despite there being no stamped obsolete date) I'd get rid of them -- why keep what you do not need? If you are not sure of the obsolete date, stamp them obsolete as of today and get rid of them in 2 years. Finally, I would say that after 2 years the documents may be destroyed at the discretion of the person in charge of that document. That way if you are busy and don't get the document destroyed after 2 years and 1 week you do not get dinged by an auditor over something minor.
__________________
Mike S. ("Gun Nut")
And they ask me why I drink....
|

18th March 2004, 12:00 PM
|
 |
Quality Manager
Registration Date: Sep 2003
Location: Illinois
|
|
Posts: 7,537
Thanks Given to Others: 182
Thanked 1,127 Times in 762 Posts
Karma Power: 397
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mike S.
Here is what I'd do: If you know the documents are obsolete and you know they are over 2 years old (despite there being no stamped obsolete date) I'd get rid of them -- why keep what you do not need? If you are not sure of the obsolete date, stamp them obsolete as of today and get rid of them in 2 years. Finally, I would say that after 2 years the documents may be destroyed at the discretion of the person in charge of that document. That way if you are busy and don't get the document destroyed after 2 years and 1 week you do not get dinged by an auditor over something minor.
|
Mike makes some good points here. Let me suggest you also add a clause to your Document Management/Control Procedures to REVIEW all documents periodically (any time period which makes sense for your organization) to determine whether they should be retained or discarded, regardless of whether they are obsolete. (Some obsolete documents [meaning they are no longer current revision] must be retained for life, health, safety purposes - in another thread about Volkswagen requirements, they mention retention for 30 or more years.)
__________________
"Few minds wear out; more rust out"
Inscribed over the entrance of Louis Pasteur School, Chicago
Christian Nestell Bovee (1820-1904) in Thoughts, Feelings and Fancies, 1857
|

18th March 2004, 12:56 PM
|
 |
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Age: 54
|
|
Posts: 618
Thanks Given to Others: 57
Thanked 59 Times in 31 Posts
Karma Power: 95
|
|
What we Did
We had 2 file cabinets full (and I do mean FULL) of drawings, sketches etc from various customers. Rather than try to sort all of these, we removed these cabinets for an "archive" room and installed 2 new file cabinets. Then when a customer called for one of these parts we go to the archives, pull the drawing and verify it is current.
This was done about a 18 months ago, and the new cabinets are nowhere near full.
James
__________________
Low tech is better than no tech.
The only constant is those who declare, "Things around here will never change!!"
|

18th March 2004, 02:09 PM
|
 |
qualitas ad nauseam
Registration Date: Sep 2003
Location: Saginaw, Michigan
Age: 50
|
|
Posts: 653
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 34 Times in 15 Posts
Karma Power: 79
|
|
This doesn't work in all cases, but when it does apply it works excellently: Determine the size of the file, bin, folder, box, or other container that holds EXACTLY the number of records for "n" years (or whatever retention time period) + say, 1/4th more. When the container is full, that is your cue to discard/destroy the "back" 20% of the records; then repeat the process.
__________________
Rob - The sum of anecdotes is not data. -Roger Brinner
|

18th March 2004, 03:48 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Jan 2001
Location: NC, USA
|
|
Posts: 3,140
Thanks Given to Others: 318
Thanked 770 Times in 525 Posts
Karma Power: 255
|
|
One thing that I have done that works well is to file things by year, mark the retention on the front of the file....i.e xxxfile, 2001, retention 2 yrs min.
That way on or after January of 2004, I know that every file in that drawer is over 2 years old and I can toss them if I so choose. I just made sure that all the files were from same year and had the same minimum retention times.
__________________
"It's fun to have fun, but you have to know how", Dr. Seuss
Man may have invented fire, it took a woman to learn how to play with it.
|

18th March 2004, 04:26 PM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dominican Republic
|
|
Posts: 44
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Karma Power: 25
|
|
triggering point
Thank you all for the inputs, I always appreciated all the help. It's so nice to be here at the cove.
|

18th March 2004, 05:29 PM
|
 |
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
|
|
Posts: 417
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 50
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mike S.
Finally, I would say that after 2 years the documents may be destroyed at the discretion of the person in charge of that document. That way if you are busy and don't get the document destroyed after 2 years and 1 week you do not get dinged by an auditor over something minor.
|
Our Registrar brought up recently that in regards to TS you can not have a procedure that has a "may" dispose of - you actually have to have a MAXIMUM retention period after which it WILL be disposed of. See 4.2.4. She says it was motivated by automotive wanting to cover their collective behinds if they had a part, for instance, that YEARS down the road/after the fact was determined to be somehow defective - they wouldn't want too many of their suppliers having RECORDS of that run, now would they!?
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|