The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18th March 2004, 08:39 AM
gheghe gheghe is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dominican Republic
 
Posts: 44
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Karma Power: 25
gheghe has disabled his/her Karma.
Send a message via Yahoo to gheghe
Default Triggering point when to dispose quality records

Our procedure said before that customer documents are retained after two years, and be dispose afterwards. I've notice that it failed to indicate the "from when". So what we did was, we added the "from obsolete/inactive date" and we have now a stamp that will tell you when it was obsoleted. My concern now is that we have lots of obsolete documents in our history files that haven't dispose yet because there's no date indicated there. I planned to traceback the current revision date of those documents but there's nothing there but the approval date of the customer, but on when we actually received the document, it was not indicated. What do you suggest to do about those documents which obviously old, ranging from 4 to 10 years old, from customer revision date)?

Thanks again for the support and inputs.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 18th March 2004, 10:21 AM
Mike S. Mike S. is offline
An Early 'Cover'

Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Coast US
 
Posts: 1,773
Thanks Given to Others: 24
Thanked 51 Times in 39 Posts
Karma Power: 103
Karma: 1849
Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

Here is what I'd do: If you know the documents are obsolete and you know they are over 2 years old (despite there being no stamped obsolete date) I'd get rid of them -- why keep what you do not need? If you are not sure of the obsolete date, stamp them obsolete as of today and get rid of them in 2 years. Finally, I would say that after 2 years the documents may be destroyed at the discretion of the person in charge of that document. That way if you are busy and don't get the document destroyed after 2 years and 1 week you do not get dinged by an auditor over something minor.
__________________
Mike S. ("Gun Nut")
And they ask me why I drink....
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 18th March 2004, 12:00 PM
Wes Bucey's Avatar
Wes Bucey Wes Bucey is offline
Quality Manager

Registration Date: Sep 2003
Location: Illinois
 
Posts: 7,537
Thanks Given to Others: 182
Thanked 1,127 Times in 762 Posts
Karma Power: 397
Karma: 11090
Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike S.

Here is what I'd do: If you know the documents are obsolete and you know they are over 2 years old (despite there being no stamped obsolete date) I'd get rid of them -- why keep what you do not need? If you are not sure of the obsolete date, stamp them obsolete as of today and get rid of them in 2 years. Finally, I would say that after 2 years the documents may be destroyed at the discretion of the person in charge of that document. That way if you are busy and don't get the document destroyed after 2 years and 1 week you do not get dinged by an auditor over something minor.
Mike makes some good points here. Let me suggest you also add a clause to your Document Management/Control Procedures to REVIEW all documents periodically (any time period which makes sense for your organization) to determine whether they should be retained or discarded, regardless of whether they are obsolete. (Some obsolete documents [meaning they are no longer current revision] must be retained for life, health, safety purposes - in another thread about Volkswagen requirements, they mention retention for 30 or more years.)
__________________
"Few minds wear out; more rust out"
Inscribed over the entrance of Louis Pasteur School, Chicago
Christian Nestell Bovee (1820-1904) in Thoughts, Feelings and Fancies, 1857
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18th March 2004, 12:56 PM
JRKH's Avatar
JRKH JRKH is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Age: 54
 
Posts: 618
Thanks Given to Others: 57
Thanked 59 Times in 31 Posts
Karma Power: 95
Karma: 2397
JRKH is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.JRKH is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.JRKH is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.JRKH is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.JRKH is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.JRKH is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.JRKH is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.JRKH is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.JRKH is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.JRKH is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.JRKH is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.JRKH is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.JRKH is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default What we Did

We had 2 file cabinets full (and I do mean FULL) of drawings, sketches etc from various customers. Rather than try to sort all of these, we removed these cabinets for an "archive" room and installed 2 new file cabinets. Then when a customer called for one of these parts we go to the archives, pull the drawing and verify it is current.

This was done about a 18 months ago, and the new cabinets are nowhere near full.

James
__________________
Low tech is better than no tech.

The only constant is those who declare, "Things around here will never change!!"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18th March 2004, 02:09 PM
Rob Nix's Avatar
Rob Nix Rob Nix is offline
qualitas ad nauseam

Registration Date: Sep 2003
Location: Saginaw, Michigan
Age: 50
 
Posts: 653
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 34 Times in 15 Posts
Karma Power: 79
Karma: 2016
Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

This doesn't work in all cases, but when it does apply it works excellently: Determine the size of the file, bin, folder, box, or other container that holds EXACTLY the number of records for "n" years (or whatever retention time period) + say, 1/4th more. When the container is full, that is your cue to discard/destroy the "back" 20% of the records; then repeat the process.
__________________
Rob - The sum of anecdotes is not data. -Roger Brinner
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18th March 2004, 03:48 PM
SteelMaiden's Avatar
SteelMaiden SteelMaiden is offline
Super Moderator

Registration Date: Jan 2001
Location: NC, USA
 
Posts: 3,140
Thanks Given to Others: 318
Thanked 770 Times in 525 Posts
Karma Power: 255
Karma: 7897
SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

One thing that I have done that works well is to file things by year, mark the retention on the front of the file....i.e xxxfile, 2001, retention 2 yrs min.

That way on or after January of 2004, I know that every file in that drawer is over 2 years old and I can toss them if I so choose. I just made sure that all the files were from same year and had the same minimum retention times.
__________________
"It's fun to have fun, but you have to know how", Dr. Seuss
Man may have invented fire, it took a woman to learn how to play with it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 18th March 2004, 04:26 PM
gheghe gheghe is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dominican Republic
 
Posts: 44
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Karma Power: 25
gheghe has disabled his/her Karma.
Send a message via Yahoo to gheghe
Thank You! triggering point

Thank you all for the inputs, I always appreciated all the help. It's so nice to be here at the cove.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 18th March 2004, 05:29 PM
SteelWoman's Avatar
SteelWoman SteelWoman is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
 
Posts: 417
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 50
Karma: 442
SteelWoman is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.SteelWoman is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.SteelWoman is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.SteelWoman is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.SteelWoman is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike S.

Finally, I would say that after 2 years the documents may be destroyed at the discretion of the person in charge of that document. That way if you are busy and don't get the document destroyed after 2 years and 1 week you do not get dinged by an auditor over something minor.
Our Registrar brought up recently that in regards to TS you can not have a procedure that has a "may" dispose of - you actually have to have a MAXIMUM retention period after which it WILL be disposed of. See 4.2.4. She says it was motivated by automotive wanting to cover their collective behinds if they had a part, for instance, that YEARS down the road/after the fact was determined to be somehow defective - they wouldn't want too many of their suppliers having RECORDS of that run, now would they!?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
How often will I update the quality records list? We have about 189 quality records cokyat Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 6 15th August 2005 10:24 AM
Training Records - At what point is training required to be documented? Marc Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 5 1st February 2005 09:10 AM
Customer Complaint Trigger Point for FDA keithm696 Customer Complaints including ISO 10002 2 2nd February 2004 10:35 AM
AS9100 Quality Record - 4.2.4 simply states Records, not Quality Records alrtorrro Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 3 3rd December 2003 09:18 AM
Control of Quality Records - What are the quality records required by QS-9000? Rea Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 3 19th April 2000 07:59 PM



The time now is 10:24 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts