Elsmar Cove Forum Header Graphic The Elsmar Cove Wiki Sitemap More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar Cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page
NQA-USA
Miner's MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) Blog 
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 17025 - General Metrology, Measurement Device, Calibration and Test Laboratories > ISO 17025 and related Metrology Topics - Measurement Devices, Calibration and Test Laboratories
Forum Username

Wooden Line

Calibration Discrimination - Acceptance criteria is not having the accuracy required?

Search the Elsmar Cove
Search Elsmar
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page  Elsmar Cove Twitter Feed
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

Howard's
International Quality Services
Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 29th March 2004, 03:40 PM
Andrews

 
 
Total Posts: 305
Question Calibration Discrimination - Acceptance criteria is not having the accuracy required?

A temperature indicator is used to check temperature of a bath that has to be maintained at 35.2 deg celsius to 39.4 deg celsius.This temp. indicator is being calibrated and the acceptance criteria is fixed as +/- 1 deg celsius.Isn't this a non-conformity as the acceptance criteria is not having the accuracy required by the test?Shouldn't the acceptance criteria be +/-0.1 deg celsius?

Comments pls.

Andrews

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 29th March 2004, 03:52 PM
The Taz!'s Avatar
The Taz!

 
 
Total Posts: 501
Depends . . . you must have the discrimination to read to 0.1 or 0.05 to see the variation in the process. IMHO, I would like to see the instrument calibrated within the working range and at the resolution required. You are paying for the calibration thus you are the customer and make the requirements.

You might want to check around and find out what is common practice for that type of process before getting into a dispute.
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 29th March 2004, 04:04 PM
tomvehoski

 
 
Total Posts: 944
There are several questions to ask:

How critical is 35.2 to 39.4? What happens if it is 39.8? Or 42?

If nothing happens, why is the spec. so tight and why are you bothering to calibrate the gage. If it may create bad material, slow down the process, etc - it is probably best to have it calibrated. If the building explodes, it should definately be calibrated. You need to make the call based on the risk and cost/benefit analysis.

What type of device is being used? RTD, Thermocouple, thermometer, etc?

For a range that narrow you may need to look at calibrating both the sensor (RTD/TC) and the readout device. Its been awhile, but I recall you can get a TC certified - for big $$$. They are not very accurate devices. Even if you have resolution to .1 degree, you need to make sure the device is still accurate enough.

Hope this helps,

Tom
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 17025 - General Metrology, Measurement Device, Calibration and Test Laboratories > ISO 17025 and related Metrology Topics - Measurement Devices, Calibration and Test Laboratories

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Acceptance Criteria for Calibration by an External Calibration Laboratory ram4302 ISO 17025 and related Metrology Topics - Measurement Devices, Calibration and Test Laboratories 5 21st August 2010 11:19 AM
Defined External Calibration Acceptance Criteria IGORTS ISO 17025 and related Metrology Topics - Measurement Devices, Calibration and Test Laboratories 10 11th December 2007 02:27 PM
Torque Calibration Accuracy Criteria Douglas E. Purdy ISO 17025 and related Metrology Topics - Measurement Devices, Calibration and Test Laboratories 7 10th August 2007 04:45 PM
Calibration 4.11 2c - Defining acceptance criteria for all equipment Wendell Goodson ISO 9001:1994 (Archived Discussions - For Reference Only) 3 27th June 2000 10:07 AM
Accuracy Criteria - Published material related to acceptable accuracy criteria Mark W ISO 17025 and related Metrology Topics - Measurement Devices, Calibration and Test Laboratories 5 27th May 1999 06:45 PM



The time now is 04:41 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


   


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, Olde West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272
NOTE: This forum uses "cookies".