The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Contract Review Process


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 1st April 2004, 05:19 AM
peter's Avatar
peter peter is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Aug 2003
Location: SHEFFIELD, ENGLAND
 
Posts: 14
Thanks Given to Others: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 26
Karma: 10
peter has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Please Help! Sales FMEA - Application of FMEA to contract review and sales process

During a recent BSI routine visit we were asked to demonstrate the application of FMEA to the contract review/sales process. We manufacture/supply a fairly 'standard' product range. The auditor suggested a 'checklist' but this sounds a bit of 'overkill'. Any suggestions gratefully received.

peter
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 1st April 2004, 06:30 AM
Claes Gefvenberg's Avatar
Claes Gefvenberg Claes Gefvenberg is offline
Forum Administrator

Registration Date: May 2000
Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
Age: 49
 
Posts: 3,771
Thanks Given to Others: 246
Thanked 244 Times in 172 Posts
Blog Entries: 13
Karma Power: 213
Karma: 4951
Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Quid Pro Quo

Hullo peter, and welcome to the Cove
Quote:
Originally Posted by peter

During a recent BSI routine visit we were asked to demonstrate the application of FMEA to the contract review/sales process.
What standard was involved?

/Claes
__________________
Hanlon's Razor.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
User Groups: Elsmar Cove Cycling Enthusiasts Formula 1 fanatics Photo freaks Readers Corner
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 1st April 2004, 06:51 AM
peter's Avatar
peter peter is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Aug 2003
Location: SHEFFIELD, ENGLAND
 
Posts: 14
Thanks Given to Others: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 26
Karma: 10
peter has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Sorry it was a routine audit by BSI against ISO 9001:2000

peter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 1st April 2004, 07:08 AM
Claes Gefvenberg's Avatar
Claes Gefvenberg Claes Gefvenberg is offline
Forum Administrator

Registration Date: May 2000
Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
Age: 49
 
Posts: 3,771
Thanks Given to Others: 246
Thanked 244 Times in 172 Posts
Blog Entries: 13
Karma Power: 213
Karma: 4951
Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter

Sorry it was a routine audit by BSI against ISO 9001:2000
Nothing to be sorry about... Ok, then: Now I wonder why the auditor asked for an FMEA? There is certainly nothing in ISO9001 that requires it. Do you have a procedure that requires you to use it?

Since your products pretty much seem to come off the shelf, your review of requirements may be fairly straightforward? Perhaps this old thread could be of interest: 7.2.2 Review of Requirements Related to the Product .

/Claes
__________________
Hanlon's Razor.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
User Groups: Elsmar Cove Cycling Enthusiasts Formula 1 fanatics Photo freaks Readers Corner

Last edited by Claes Gefvenberg; 1st April 2004 at 07:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 1st April 2004, 01:39 PM
The Taz!'s Avatar
The Taz! The Taz! is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Nov 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 59
 
Posts: 493
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 46
Karma: 619
The Taz! is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.The Taz! is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.The Taz! is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.The Taz! is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.The Taz! is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.The Taz! is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to The Taz! Send a message via Yahoo to The Taz!
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Claes Gefvenberg

Nothing to be sorry about... Ok, then: Now I wonder why the auditor asked for an FMEA? There is certainly nothing in ISO9001 that requires it. Do you have a procedure that requires you to use it?

Since your products pretty much seem to come off the shelf, your review of requirements may be fairly straightforward? Perhaps this old thread could be of interest: 7.2.2 Review of Requirements Related to the Product .

/Claes
Good advice. . . IMHO, A Process is a Process and can be prone to a multitude of Failure Modes. . with corresponding effects. I think it is overkill in the Contract Review area to use a FMEA, but you might want to give some consideration to using an automotive tool called an AQP checklist. AQP=Advanced Quality Plan. It addresses all needed requirements, resources, timelines and milestones. More suited to new product introduction but a tool none-the-less.

Again, it may be a bit of overkill, but it does eliminate error by omission. A failure Mode in itself. The checklist can be as long or short or detailed as needed in your case.

IMO, I think your auditor MAY have been looking at consistency in the process.
__________________
If something is over engineered. . . it will probably be under manufactured! (Jim Eustace 1993)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Contract Review Process

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
How to Calculate RPN in Design FMEA (DFMEA) vs. Process FMEA (PFMEA) nsraj FMEA and Control Plans 4 19th March 2008 10:50 AM
Sales Group Using Contract Manufacturer, Contract Designer for ISO 13485 Products Here I Am Design and Development - Process and Product 4 3rd December 2007 03:36 PM
Need Help with Process FMEA Basics - Feasibility Analysis Outputs are Inputs to FMEA? ilarioduo FMEA and Control Plans 24 28th June 2006 11:02 AM
PFMEA for manufacturing - Please review my Process FMEA Annette FMEA and Control Plans 4 1st March 2006 08:57 AM
AS9100 Contract Review - Can the Sales Manager be the process owner? pstephen Contract Review Process 4 19th January 2006 11:15 AM



The time now is 09:15 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts