The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 10013 - Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 2nd April 2004, 01:28 PM
Ace's Avatar
Ace Ace is offline
Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: CA USA
 
Posts: 15
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Karma Power: 33
Karma: 20
Ace has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question I have to CITE the ISO clause in BOTH my Quality Manual and in department procedures?

Help!!!
I am having a hard time finding a reference in ISO 9K2K that states I have to document the ISO clause in both my Quality Manual and also in department procedures. Example: My quality manual states the following ISO requirement for clause 8.2.2 - "The audit program is planned and takes into consideration the staus and importance of the processes and areas to be audited, as well as the results of the previous audits". My internal audit procedure defines only our process and does not repeat the above section.
Our ISO registrar states that I am required to document the ISO clause in both my manual and procedures. Confused as to why this is needed in both places. Thank you in advance for your professional advice.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 2nd April 2004, 01:49 PM
Teri Teri is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ohio
Age: 39
 
Posts: 196
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
Karma Power: 34
Karma: 197
Teri is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.Teri is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Default

I would ask the regristrar where this requirement is.
Are you sure that they are saying you must have the clause in both places?

I have the clause in my manual, however my procedure states how I meet the clause, it does not contain the clause though.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 2nd April 2004, 02:10 PM
RCBeyette's Avatar
RCBeyette RCBeyette is offline
When in doubt - THINK!

Registration Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 35
 
Posts: 2,247
Thanks Given to Others: 113
Thanked 265 Times in 176 Posts
Blog Entries: 2
Karma Power: 217
Karma: 7073
RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.RCBeyette is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via Yahoo to RCBeyette
Default

Like Teri, I address the Clause in my Quality Manual, but get into specifics in my lower level documentation. Is your Registrar, perhaps, looking for a definitive link between the levels of documents? In my Quality Manual, in the Audit section, I reference the associated documentation detailing how audits are scheduled, conducted, etc. And in those documents, I reference back up to the Quality Manual.
__________________
~ Roxane ~
"There's a fine line between genius and insanity. I have erased this line." - Oscar Levant
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 2nd April 2004, 02:11 PM
Graeme's Avatar
Graeme Graeme is offline
$ Contributor

Registration Date: Sep 2000
Location: Lilburn, GA, USA
Age: 60
 
Posts: 401
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Karma Power: 63
Karma: 894
Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Graeme Send a message via MSN to Graeme Send a message via Yahoo to Graeme
Default

I agree with Teri -- ask the auditor or registrar to show you where the "shall" is.


This is the sort of thing a document matrix -- or a good web page on the internal network -- is supposed to take care of:
  • show the relationship of the Quality Manual to the Standard, and then
  • show the relationship of the policies/procedures/forms/records to the Quality Manual.
(Of course, they may be asking for it for their own convenience which is a completely different issue...)
__________________
Graeme C. Payne
ASQ Sr. Member; CQE; CCT

"Does it matter if the measurement result is wrong?
If it does, then calibrate the instrument.
If it doesn't matter, they why are you making the measurement?"
(P. G. Stein, 2000)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 2nd April 2004, 03:45 PM
apestate apestate is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Jan 2003
Location: Melbourne, FL
 
Posts: 446
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 59
Karma: 1151
apestate is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.apestate is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.apestate is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.apestate is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.apestate is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.apestate is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.apestate is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.apestate is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.apestate is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.
Default

Ace

Be sure and clarify what the auditor is asking for. Are you in the document review/bench audit stage? Make very sure, as has been stated by the other responders, that she/he's not just asking for a statement of scope or reference to manual in the procedure.

Registrar auditors work very close to the standard and sometimes aren't the best at communicating otherwise simple concepts because of the nature of their involvement.

There is a standard for writing procedures, but nothing in ISO 9001-01 about that. You'll be looking for a while. I think ISO drafted a 10013 that talks about documenting, table of contents structure and format sort of thing.

As far as ISO 9001 is concerned, you could make the documents any way you wanted, even video could be a QMS procedure, or a flowchart

This sounds more like a suggestion to me. choose your battles.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 2nd April 2004, 04:12 PM
Ace's Avatar
Ace Ace is offline
Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: CA USA
 
Posts: 15
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Karma Power: 33
Karma: 20
Ace has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Thanks to all for your feedback.
FYI - In my Quality Manual I referenced the Int. Audit procedure, and in the procedure, I referenced the Quality Manual. I pointed this out to the auditor and he still said I had to state the requirement in both places. When I asked him for the reference he stated 8.2.2, and wrote a non-conformance against it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 2nd April 2004, 04:18 PM
Teri Teri is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ohio
Age: 39
 
Posts: 196
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
Karma Power: 34
Karma: 197
Teri is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.Teri is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Default

I would personally argue that one.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 2nd April 2004, 04:31 PM
Al Rosen's Avatar
Al Rosen Al Rosen is offline
Forum Moderator

Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lawn Guyland
Age: 59
 
Posts: 3,101
Thanks Given to Others: 48
Thanked 390 Times in 272 Posts
Karma Power: 192
Karma: 4968
Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Al Rosen
Default

Ace,

Although the auditor is wrong. If this is the only place he has cited you for this, it is easier to acquiesce then to fight him otherwise formally challenge it. You don't want to have to revise all your procedures and manual. BTW, If you haven't referenced the clause within your procedures, why is this the only place he dinged you?
__________________
Al
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 10013 - Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals

Bookmarks

Tags
documentation, procedure content, procedures, quality manual content, quality manuals


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
ISO 13485 Clause 4.2.2 Documentation Structure - Quality Manual clarification QualitySysISOAdmin ISO 13485 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems 6 25th February 2009 03:47 PM
Quality Manual and Procedures Manual for Small Service Business comedyjester ISO 10013 - Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 11 27th November 2008 02:28 AM
What to Cite for Failure to Follow Defined Procedures Gary L. Phillips ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 18 21st October 2003 08:38 AM
ISO/TS 16949:2002 Quality Manual and Procedures North Coast ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4 3rd March 2003 12:13 PM
ISO 17025 Quality Manual and 58 page Checklist - And how many procedures do I need? Ken K ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 5 15th October 2002 05:07 AM



The time now is 07:51 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts