|
|
 |

15th May 2004, 11:00 AM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Feb 2004
Location: Taiwan
|
|
Posts: 1
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 24 Karma: 10 
|
|
Do the inspection stages in flow chart also need to come out the FMEA?
Dear sirs;
I have one question regard to flow chart vs PFMEA. As we knew, the PFMEAs should come out with flow chart step by steop. If one flow chart like as below with inspection stahes, do inspection stages also should have its FMEA or we just skip inspection stage when come out the PFMEA.
Material incoming inspection -->Process 1-->inspection A-->Process 2-->Inspection 2
Hope you can give me the suggestion
Thanks
|

15th May 2004, 02:00 PM
|
 |
Mod...
Registration Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oregon, MI
Age: 51
|
|
Posts: 577
Thanks Given to Others: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Karma Power: 46
|
|
Welcome,
I would say that flow charts are the visual map of what happens. The PFMEA is the thought process (documented) leading to the actual process that can be delivered by a flow chart.
Al...
__________________
"Para ... Bellum"
|

15th May 2004, 05:22 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fremont, California
|
|
Posts: 546
Thanks Given to Others: 13
Thanked 36 Times in 35 Posts
Karma Power: 50
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jj1234
Dear sirs;
I have one question regard to flow chart vs PFMEA. As we knew, the PFMEAs should come out with flow chart step by steop. If one flow chart like as below with inspection stahes, do inspection stages also should have its FMEA or we just skip inspection stage when come out the PFMEA.
Material incoming inspection -->Process 1-->inspection A-->Process 2-->Inspection 2
Hope you can give me the suggestion
Thanks
|
This is a tricky question.
Example: If the inspection step is a visual inspection, we do not consider it as a step to go through failure mode, cause, effect, severity, Occurrence and detection.
If the process involve clamping the part or loading in an inspection fixture, then Yes. This may cause certain failure due to excessive clamping or scratching a polished surface.
I suggest,we have to evaluate the situation and decide whether the inspection step should be included in a PFMEA.
Regards,
Govind.
|

17th May 2004, 09:25 AM
|
 |
Dogs rule
Registration Date: Jul 2002
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 56
|
|
Posts: 980
Thanks Given to Others: 15
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Karma Power: 69
|
|
Welcome to the Cove
All "Sequence" steps shown in the Flow Chart show in both my PFMEAs and Control Plans. Questions for those not doing so - Can an operator misread a gage? Can a gage "misread" a part? Regarding visual inspection - Are the visual controls adequate/current? These three questions are "Potential Causes" in the PFMEA (at least in my methodology) relating to "Failure Modes" of passing a defective part or rejecting an acceptable part.
Just my
Bill
__________________
There is no psychiatrist in the world like a puppy licking your face. - Ben Williams
|

17th May 2004, 09:30 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Nov 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 493
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 46
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bill Ryan
Welcome to the Cove
All "Sequence" steps shown in the Flow Chart show in both my PFMEAs and Control Plans. Questions for those not doing so - Can an operator misread a gage? Can a gage "misread" a part? Regarding visual inspection - Are the visual controls adequate/current? These three questions are "Potential Causes" in the PFMEA (at least in my methodology) relating to "Failure Modes" of passing a defective part or rejecting an acceptable part.
Just my
Bill
|
I'm with you Bill. . .
__________________
If something is over engineered. . . it will probably be under manufactured! (Jim Eustace 1993)
|

17th May 2004, 09:51 AM
|
 |
Quality Team
Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Carolina
Age: 66
|
|
Posts: 1,474
Thanks Given to Others: 87
Thanked 159 Times in 114 Posts
Karma Power: 127
|
|
I agree with Bill and Taz, each step of the inspection stage contribute to the probability of detecting a failure, and visual inspection should be considered since it is part of the process, and shown on the flow chart. Visual criteria must have been established for inspection for accept/reject correct?
__________________
"Nothing is constant except change"
|

17th May 2004, 10:15 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Nov 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 493
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 46
|
|
Also consider customer input regarding the Visual Inspection Detection score. Some customers will not allow a score less than a 5 for visuals. This should be defined during the APQP process.
__________________
If something is over engineered. . . it will probably be under manufactured! (Jim Eustace 1993)
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|