Thank you, Christian.
I'm a little reluctant to post the one I wrote.
Some folks here might view that as an unauthorized disclosure of proprietary materials. I'm glad you did!
The procedure I wrote is 6 pages, and mostly in the form of a flow chart.
It is more specific to automated inspection, but in general follows yours.
May I ask a couple questions?
In 7.8 you suggest an operator has no influence on automated measurement equipment.
I agree with you, but not everyone does.
Q ---How do you prove this to an auditor (or doubter)?
In 7.9, you detail a procedure for a GR&R.
Q ---Why include this in the MSA procedure?
The GR&R assumes operator variability exists, and most certainly will attribute a substantial portion of the total variability in this index.
Q ---How do you interpret the reproducibility index for automated inspection?
Q ---Do you make any alterations to the GR&R procedure to accommodate automated inspection equipment?
I have a thread on this subject. Please check it out.