The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 19th August 1998, 02:02 PM
Tony Grover
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Let Me Help You What is the best procedure for calibrating / certifying our Calipers?

We primarily use calipers for inspection. We have a set of gage blocks certified to NIST. What is the procedure for certifying our Calipers. We are going for ISO9002 in 98 and QS9000 in 99. I know we have a lot to learn in this area. Is anyone willing to help us get started down the right track.
thanks.

Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 19th August 1998, 09:18 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,859
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,568 Times in 1,020 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11569
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Default

You have two choices for your calipers:

1. Send them out for calibration.

2. Work up a procedure for calibation and use your gage blocks to verify the calibration of the calipers.

How's that for starters?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 20th August 1998, 12:10 PM
jcl
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

And to add .. if you use the 2nd method (recommended .. thats what we do) make sure you have a procedure to regularly send out the gage blocks for calibration to NIST.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21st August 1998, 07:37 AM
SCOTT SNYDER
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

ALSO MAKE SURE YOU HAVE A CYLINDRICAL RING GAUGE AND ENOUGH BLOCKS TO CHECK THE COMPLETE RANGE OF ANY CALIPERS YOU HAVE(ie. 12",6", etc.)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22nd August 1998, 07:48 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,859
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,568 Times in 1,020 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11569
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Default

Or at least the ranges or points you use.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 9th May 2005, 01:37 AM
sarasheed sarasheed is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Apr 2005
Location: India, State:Andhra pradesh
 
Posts: 43
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Karma Power: 19
Karma: 24
sarasheed has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

We are using Stick Type of Michrometers to measure the Internal Diameters from 50 mm to 1500mm.This michrometer consists of a Michrometer Head and set extension rods which if assembled will read upto 1500 mm.I want to know how to calibrate this type of Michrometer.At preselnt we calibrate the Michrometer Head for the Pitch deviation and and attach the reading of each individual extensiln Rod in the calibration certificate .This Certificate is will be there along with the Michrometer during its use.

I request somebody to react to this method.Is it serving the purpose of calibration?.Can somebody suggest any other method.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 9th May 2005, 05:00 PM
Hershal's Avatar
Hershal Hershal is offline
Metrologist-Auditor

Registration Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal, California, U.S.
Age: 53
 
Posts: 1,621
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 310 Times in 224 Posts
Karma Power: 186
Karma: 6526
Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

The basic approach seems OK, although I would point out that you also need to take into account what is known as "wringing", that is the joining of gage blocks - or in this case rods - to obtain a given length. The normal value given to ringing is 0.00005 inch per wringing. Thus, joining five rods will have four junctions, or wringings, with a total number of 0.0002 inch.this goes into the uncertainty calculations also.

There are likely some other sources of error you should take into account, but aside from temperature and RH it would be difficult to say which, without knowing the specific situation.

Hope that helps.

Hershal

Moderator's comment:
"Wringing" is the action of putting two blocks or rods together and giving a slight twist to "wring" the air out from between the blocks and form a vacuum which helps hold the blocks together from the outside air pressure pushing the blocks together. In some cases, the block can be suspended upside down and will not separate. To disengage the blocks, they are "unwrung." -Wes Bucey

Last edited by Wes Bucey; 9th May 2005 at 05:28 PM. Reason: change "ringing" to "wringing" (the correct spelling)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12th May 2005, 12:22 AM
sarasheed sarasheed is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Apr 2005
Location: India, State:Andhra pradesh
 
Posts: 43
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Karma Power: 19
Karma: 24
sarasheed has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default


Thanking you for giving reply to my doubt about calibration of Stick type Inside Michrometers.

S.A.Rasheed
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Calibrating a Gage Block In-house with Calibrated Digital Calipers ollie107 ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 7 18th August 2009 10:19 PM
Validation of A Procedure for Calibrating Dial Calipers using Traceable Gauge Blocks Rustedamy ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 6 9th April 2008 05:38 PM
Help: Procedure for calibrating files used to check hardness Grizz1345 ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 1 23rd September 2004 02:31 PM
Calibrating .001" resolution Dial Calipers - Calibration and safeguarding procedure apestate ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 6 18th November 2003 05:05 PM
Calibration Procedures for checking and certifying micrometers and calipers mibusha ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 3 10th March 1999 08:53 AM



The time now is 06:19 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts