The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 8th January 1999, 05:03 PM
elbee
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default The correct way to read the gage is???

Hello everyone

Say that I have a part with a feature that is supposed to measure 0.111 +/- .001 according to the drawing.

The gage I am using to measure this has an accuracy of 0.0000

Would a reading of .1121 be acceptable? Would .1126? The argument here at work is (Eng.) the gage is capable of measuring to .0000 so we SHOULD take advantage of that and use tighter measurment. The other side (QA) says that although the gage is capable, the feature is only designed to .000 so nothing past the third decimal place should matter.

Is there any guidance out there on this?

Thanks
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 8th January 1999, 10:57 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11559
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Default

Take a look at:

http://Elsmar.com/ubb/Forum5/HTML/000027.html
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 9th January 1999, 08:26 PM
Don Winton's Avatar
Don Winton Don Winton is offline
dWizard

Registration Date: Nov 1998
Location: Tullahoma, TN
Age: 53
 
Posts: 475
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Karma Power: 63
Karma: 488
Don Winton is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.Don Winton is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.Don Winton is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.Don Winton is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.Don Winton is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.
Default

elbee,

Welcome to the Cove.

I may be mistaken in this. The implied purpose of measuring to a significant digit in excess of the specification is to determine exactly what you are asking. IMHO, if the specification is 0.111 +/- 0.001, then 0.1121 is NONCONFORMING. To mirror Marc’s suggestion, it is more important to meet the intent of the specification. Do not become caught up in the ‘goal=post’ method of thinking.

Quote:
The other side (QA) says that although the gage is capable, the feature is only designed to 0.000 so nothing past the third decimal place should matter.
I disagree. Ask your phone company when one minute equals one minute. Perhaps the QA department is more concerned with meeting the letter of the specification rather than the intent of the specification. Just a thought.

Regards,
Don


[This message has been edited by Don Winton (edited 01-09-99).]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28th September 2003, 02:31 AM
ljreimer ljreimer is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Sep 2003
Location: Riverside, CA
 
Posts: 2
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 26
Karma: 10
ljreimer has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default non conforming decisions

IF the tolerance of the device is 0.111 ±0.001 then 0.112 would be acceptable, to take advantage of the measuring device that has an accuracy of ±0.0001 if that is really the accuracy, many gages have resolutions of ±0.0001 but the resolution of the gage does not always support an accuacy equal to resolution.

Lookup the accuracy of the device to verify that is will produce an accuracy of ±0.0001. An device of this accuracy will be subject to temperature conditions at the time of measurement due to change of mass.

when the readings and the tolerances of the device are close to pass/fail requirments, review the data history on this device should help
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Confusion Reigns As Analog TV Begins Shutdown Marc HDTV - High Definition Television 2 18th February 2009 12:00 AM
How many items should be tested to qualify an analog IC? ohlargeone Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 2 7th December 2006 08:21 PM
Gage Supplier - Need a 72" (min) Digital Read Out LLM for the Shop Floor qcman ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 2 1st September 2006 01:46 PM
Digital vs. Analog Megohmmeter - Analog vs. DMM - Seeking Reviews / Opinions Kenneth Czar ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 6 18th August 2005 02:50 PM
Read or recite? Is it OK to read the company quality policy from a sheet of paper? dbulak ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 12 30th March 2005 08:44 AM



The time now is 08:50 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts