|
|
 |

13th July 2004, 01:53 PM
|
 |
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Jul 2004
Location: WI/USA
|
|
Posts: 399
Thanks Given to Others: 12
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Karma Power: 42
|
|
Working with UL for Product Certification - Electronic component
Just starting to research the recognized component mark from UL. The company I am with wants to obtain this for a electronic component. Anyone have any words of wisdom for dealing with UL??
--Jodi
|

13th July 2004, 02:09 PM
|
 |
Quality Team
Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Carolina
Age: 66
|
|
Posts: 1,474
Thanks Given to Others: 87
Thanked 159 Times in 114 Posts
Karma Power: 127
|
|
I worked with UL several years ago regarding UL labeling of rubber and plastics products and never had a problem with them. Just make sure you are d oing the right things
__________________
"Nothing is constant except change"
|

13th July 2004, 02:23 PM
|
 |
Forum Moderator
Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lawn Guyland
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 3,101
Thanks Given to Others: 48
Thanked 390 Times in 272 Posts
Karma Power: 192
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by qualitygoddess
Just starting to research the recognized component mark from UL. The company I am with wants to obtain this for a electronic component. Anyone have any words of wisdom for dealing with UL??
--Jodi
|
I've worked for UL and I now use ETL (Intertek) for safety testing. I believe UL will give you a more detailed report and include the raw data. I would look at both for your requirements since either one can issue a mark that is recognized in the US, Canada and around the world. Also look at CSA. They may differ in delivery time and cost.
__________________
Al
|

14th July 2004, 09:56 AM
|
 |
Metrologist-Auditor
Registration Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal, California, U.S.
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 1,621
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 310 Times in 224 Posts
Karma Power: 186
|
|
One thing to keep in mind when dealing with any of the product certifiers (UL, CSA, Intertek, ARL, etc.) is to clearly define the requirements including the markets and by extension the likely customer base, and the projected use of the component and in what environment(s).
Each of these organizations has many test standards available and which ones will be used depend on the client giving good information. Each of these organizations does a good contract review, but still depend on the client.
I can assure you that each of the organizations named in this thread so far are good and are reliable. Each carry mutiple acreditations (including IAS).
Hershal
|

14th July 2004, 05:08 PM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: May 2004
Location: US
|
|
Posts: 26
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 23 Karma: 45 
|
|
My suggestion for dealing with UL is to get well acquainted with the product standard before you even call them. Most of the time, you can walk in and tell them what you feel is needed for testing, and save a bunch of time and headaches. Also by doing this, you (should) have done your pre-testing to ensure the product will pass their test.
Your engineer will become your best friend for a while, so make sure there is a good rapport. After the project is done, the engineer will step out, and the follow-up services inspector will step in. This is also a very key relationship to maintain.
There are some different rules between UL listed and UL recognized, too, so do your homework there. In general, get to know the organization as a whole, perhaps even volunteering for the Standards Technical Panel (STP) for the standard you will be using.
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|