|
|
 |

17th August 2004, 06:36 AM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Jun 2004
Location: uk
|
|
Posts: 5
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 23 Karma: 10 
|
|
Does a company need a TQS to compete ?
Hello Folks !
I was thinking does a compagny need a TQS nowdays to compete?
There is some + ou and some +
Such as
+acces to internationnal standart (iso 9000)
better understanding of the overall business
cutumer orintd for sure !
underatnd custumer need
Reduce NC to custumer
Imporve over all business
-
Paper wok
long term thinking
a new way of thinking the business
no real return on investement (short term)
...what you think???
back to the groupe !
|

17th August 2004, 07:13 AM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
By TQS do you mean Total Quality System?
|

17th August 2004, 05:25 PM
|
 |
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Jun 2004
Location: Butler, PA USA
Age: 37
|
|
Posts: 67
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 27 Karma: 165  
|
|
TQS is too general
I find this kind of generic classification somewhat hard to understand.
TQS could be formal, published quality standard like ISO 9001 or its industry specific analogues.
TQS could be A defined management system (procedures, forms,etc) that sets up a system for reporting quality issues and dealing with them.
TQS could even be the design of processes to minimize quality.
so many definitions. most people seem to assume we are speaking about documentation and if so, I think we need conditions to your list.
SOME Documentation systems reduce NC
SOME Documentation systems is customer oriented
SOME Documentation systems improves business
therefore IMHO, the Major minus, is setting up an overly expansive, waste of paper, people, and time.
TQS of course sounds very much like TQM, which was a marketing tool for those striving to get businesses to care more about, and create investments in quality.
IF TQM was never very standardized, certainly TQS isn't. and its just so blasted hard to generalize about these things when the subject isn't well defined.
__________________
Jay Oliphant, CQE and CQT.
also an experienced analytical chemist with computer skills (the Microsoft Office User Specialist creditial).
|

17th August 2004, 05:41 PM
|
 |
Quality Team
Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Carolina
Age: 66
|
|
Posts: 1,474
Thanks Given to Others: 87
Thanked 159 Times in 114 Posts
Karma Power: 127
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pinchon
Hello Folks !
I was thinking does a compagny need a TQS nowdays to compete?
There is some + ou and some +
Such as
+acces to internationnal standart (iso 9000)
better understanding of the overall business
cutumer orintd for sure !
underatnd custumer need
Reduce NC to custumer
Imporve over all business
-
Paper wok
long term thinking
a new way of thinking the business
no real return on investement (short term)
...what you think???
back to the groupe !
|
Suggest you look at Dr. Juran's Handbook on Total Quality, and Dr. A. Feigenbaugm TQM book
These will give you a total picture of what a quality systems should encompass. Hope this helps
__________________
"Nothing is constant except change"
|

18th August 2004, 04:43 AM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Jun 2004
Location: uk
|
|
Posts: 5
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 23 Karma: 10 
|
|
Tqs..tqm
Actualy You are right I was more meanning TQM than TQS...If we assume that a TQM bring a TQS...
So For you does a compagny need a TQM to compete?
I would say there no realy YEs or no,,,in my point of vieu
A TQM have an influence on the overall Buss ..I split them in those point :
-Custumer
-Quality product
-Supplier
-Employee
-Global
For each of them I can see that a TQM can have a good and a bad influence,,,,
Take the Custumer side for 1st exemple :
-------The good points.
-A tQM can help to get a certification ISO, a well done one. That can help to get more custumer, or to stay in Buss (TS16949)
-The custumer will get less NC
-We will understandd better custumer needs,
-reduce his complaint and deal better with them as well
-increase the cust satisfaction
-Build a Win WIn realtion with the custumer, Cust can help in produc t developnemnt
ETc....
------As bad point : If a compagny go for a TQM what will be the disavantage for it ?
-They can get an ISO but they can get it the wrong way....just get the "stample" cetificate without doing realy anything...like fake gold..
-No short term return on investment
I-f a compagny is in bad condition to much transparencie can afraid the custumer...DIC data base etc...
-If we reach a good level of qulity we can miss a range of custumer..(Buss Strategie)
well that some idea for the custumer point,,,
I still don't realy see clearly if a compagny (international) realy need a TQM nodays to compete (globaly)...
Would you advice to all compagny to get a TQM...?
back to the group
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|