|
|
 |

10th September 1999, 05:32 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
Errors - Uncertainty Type I, II, or Alpha, Beta vs. Gage R&R
Pertty Simple, eh?
-----snippo-----
Subject: Re: Uncertainty type A and B vs. gage R&R studies
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 1999 11:32:40 -0400
From: Eric Stern
OK, our goal is to determine the probability of the two types of errors (I and II, alpha and beta, A and B) in order to best understand the reality behind the measurements. Repeatability, reproducibility and bias are the parameters measured in gage R&R studies in order to arrive at estimates of those errors. The AIAG MSA Measurement System Analysis reference manual gives a very detailed description of the way it is done.
--
Eric Stern
Expertech CMSC
Tel/Fax: (514) 483-6264
|

10th September 1999, 06:16 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
Subject: Re: Uncertainty type A and B vs. gage R&R studies
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 18:52:14 -0400
From: Philip Stein
Guys, STOP!! You're way off base. Type A and B have NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH ALPHA AND BETA ERRORS. See: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Uncertainty/index.html and download technote 1297 from there, or come to my course this coming Monday in Toledo or read ANSI/NCSL Z-540-2 or read my November column in Quality Progress, but whatever, get with the program!!
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|