|
|
 |
|

23rd September 2004, 04:59 PM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: May 2004
Location: Home of The King
|
|
Posts: 269
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 35
|
|
TL 9000 Registration Audit - Notes from the Field - Telecommunications
Next week, 9/27/04, begins our TL 9000 Registration Audit. I've been involved in this project since February of 2003. Efforts to achieve TL 9000 registration at our organization began 2 years prior to that.
It has been a slow process but I have learned a great deal about our organization and the implementation of a QMS in general. While TL registration was underway we also managed to migrate from ISO 9002:1994 to ISO 9001:2000.
The TL registration audit will last 2 weeks. We are registering 5 sites. The external auditor will visit 3. I work at HQ and its audit lasts 5 days. One other site is a 3 day audit and the third site is a 2 day audit. Two sites will not get visited but will have their internal audit records audited by our registrar.
Once the audit cycle is completed and we are awarded TL 9000 registration, we will be one of only 13 other organizations worldwide registered to our Product Category (TL requires the registration scope to include a product category). Last time I checked there were only a little over 500 organizations worldwide registered to TL 9000.
I had a hard time finding information on the web regarding specifics about TL 9000 registration. Currently there is only one "sanctioned" organization providing any public training for TL (including auditor training). I intend to post the results of our TL registration throughout the next 2 weeks or so. I hope to provide some information for others seeking TL 9000 registration.
Jaime
|
|
Thanks to jaimezepeda for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|

23rd September 2004, 06:29 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fremont, California
|
|
Posts: 546
Thanks Given to Others: 13
Thanked 36 Times in 35 Posts
Karma Power: 50
|
|
Jaime,
I will be interested in your feedback. Sometime in the future we will go for TL9000 for our site. Two of our other sites are TL9000 registered. Iam also TL9000 certified Lead auditor.
What are you covering in TL9000: Hardware-Software-Service- Combination of these? Since you mentioned that there are only 12 organizations across world registered to your product category, do you have enough data in the QUEST Forum Site for Benchmarking? This will be a challenge.
If you are covering Software in your registration, you have some pretty good requirements in that category.
Thanks for letting us know. Good luck with your TL9000 registration efforts.
Regards,
Govind.
|

24th September 2004, 12:56 AM
|
|
Forum Moderator
Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: Silvassa,Near Mumbai in INDIA
Age: 43
|
|
Posts: 316
Thanks Given to Others: 5
Thanked 43 Times in 10 Posts
Karma Power: 50
|
|
Tl - 9000
We are manufacturing and supplying Copper Cathodes (LME Grade) and CCR (Continious Cast Rods) to our customers. CCR are mainly used to draw wires and further used for Telecommunication Industries.
My request is to guide me that Can we go for TL - 9000 for CCR Plant.
I searched QUEST Forum also but could not get clue.
Regards,
Manoj
|

24th September 2004, 10:15 AM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: May 2004
Location: Home of The King
|
|
Posts: 269
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 35
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Govind
What are you covering in TL9000: Hardware-Software-Service- Combination of these? Since you mentioned that there are only 12 organizations across world registered to your product category, do you have enough data in the QUEST Forum Site for Benchmarking? This will be a challenge.
...
Regards,
Govind.
|
Govind,
We are registering to Service (V) only.
I went back and double checked the product category we are registering (7.7) and there are now 15 organizations registered.
Getting data from QuEST means paying $10K per year to be a QuEST member. We cannot justify that expenditure. I asked around for benchmarking data here in The Cove and elsewhere. I have had no luck getting it. Not even our customers that requested we seek TL registration will give us benchmarking data and they are QuEST members themselves. Maybe there is none.
I went through the Xcel auditor training earlier this year. I understand there is now a new lead auditor requirement. All I know is I have a certificate saying I passed the TL 9000 auditor class and it has a QuEST Forum seal on it so I am legal
I've decide to post a summary of each day of our audit to this thread. Lord knows that I could have used something like it.
Jaime
|

24th September 2004, 10:26 AM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: May 2004
Location: Home of The King
|
|
Posts: 269
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 35
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Manoj Mathur
We are manufacturing and supplying Copper Cathodes (LME Grade) and CCR (Continious Cast Rods) to our customers. CCR are mainly used to draw wires and further used for Telecommunication Industries.
My request is to guide me that Can we go for TL - 9000 for CCR Plant.
I searched QUEST Forum also but could not get clue.
Regards,
Manoj
|
Manoj,
TL 9000 registration requires that you choose a product category from a table of categories published by QuEST. You can go to the QuEST Site and search for the latest product category table.
I am not familiar with the product you mentioned so I cannot help you determine your product category.
Getting started on TL 9000 was challenging for us. There is not much out there in the area of training. QuEST works with only one organization to provide training. When I first tried to attend a course it was canceled twice because they did not have enough participants. I eventually got to take the training course.
I noticed you are in India so it may be difficult for you to find training.
Go to this link and search for a registered organization close to you or associated with you:
http://tl9000rrs.org/QuEST/basicSearch.jsp
Maybe that would be a good place for you to get started.
Jaime
|

24th September 2004, 05:21 PM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: May 2004
Location: Home of The King
|
|
Posts: 269
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 35
|
|
TL 9000 Registration Audit - Last day before the audit
It is the last business day before the registration audit begins on Monday.
I have closed all the CARs that can be closed prior to the audit. I distributed the audit plan submitted by the external auditor (a detailed plan I must admit). I have arranged for a conference room to conduct the opening meeting and a separate work area for the external auditor to use throughout the week. There is no need for spcecial safety equipment for the external auditor (thank goodness).
Several folks came by my desk to ask how they could be prepared for the audit. Among these folks were 2 vice presidents, several managers and our organization's president. It is encouraging to see folks recognize the importance of this addition to our QMS.
I have gathered what I feel I will need to be prepared when the external auditor arrives Monday morning:
- TL 9000 Requirements Handbook.
- Printed copy of our quality manual.
- Records of our measurement submissions to QuEST. We are only required to submit the common TL measurements due to the nature of our registration. They are: - On-time delivery
- Number of problems report
- Problem report fix response time
- Overdue problem report fix response time
- Internal audit reports for sites that will not be visited by the external auditor but included in the registration scope. Our registrar will use these reports to audit those sites not visited by the external auditor.
- A legal pad.
I have no plans for this weekend except watch The Discovery Channel.
Jaime
|

27th September 2004, 05:42 PM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: May 2004
Location: Home of The King
|
|
Posts: 269
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 35
|
|
TL 9000 Registration Audit - Day 1
The audit began with a great opening meeting. Our external auditor (EA) explained in detail the scope of the audit. EA detailed how his job is to audit the system and not the performance of the staff. He also explained the differences between a major and minor nonconformance. This has confused many in the past.
Something new from our registrar is that it now requires proof of root cause analysis to be submitted with each corrective action. EA explained how a form will be supplied for us to fill out regarding root cause analysis. I was pleased to hear this as many times our staff fill out CARs with "trained employee" as a corrective action and no root cause analysis. It will definitely help us to dig deep when determining why sometimes things go haywire.
This is definitely a process oriented audit. We began with clause 7.1 and are working our way through through the rest of clause 7 (product realization). This is good for me as this first involves the real work that goes on over here. EA will be interviewing sales staff and production staff for the first couple of days.
I did come across a small surprise. TL clause 7.1.C.3 - Disaster Recovery states that the "organization" is to have measures in place to ensure business continuity. I thought this meant the place where I work should have some sort of disaster recovery plan. EA interpreted it to mean "measures to ensure the business continuity of the CUSTOMER." This is a real downfall of TL. Since TL was originally written with the Bell companies in mind (SBC, Verizon, etc.), much of the wording was refers to the customer as the organization. The TL standard is written from the customer's perspective rather than the organization's (anyone seeking registration) perspective. There really is a need for QuEST to update all the wording in TL 9000 to be consistent with ISO 9K2K wording and definitions. Fortunately we have measures in place to ensure our own business continuity and offer related services to our customers. So, we were covered either way.
At the end of the end of the day the EA and I had a recap of the day's findings and thus far there have been zero nonconformances. The EA did explain he wanted to research a couple of findings that may end up as observations. His concern is that we may be able to exclude a couple of clauses due to the nature of our business. We are a wholesale distributor.
Altogether it is proving to be a pleasant experience. Ooops! Did I mean that?
I am out of here for today. I am going to the gym to exercise and then I'm headed home to watch American Choppers on The Discovery Channel.
Jaime
|

27th September 2004, 09:46 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fremont, California
|
|
Posts: 546
Thanks Given to Others: 13
Thanked 36 Times in 35 Posts
Karma Power: 50
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jaimezepeda
I did come across a small surprise. TL clause 7.1.C.3 - Disaster Recovery states that the "organization" is to have measures in place to ensure business continuity. I thought this meant the place where I work should have some sort of disaster recovery plan. EA interpreted it to mean "measures to ensure the business continuity of the CUSTOMER." This is a real downfall of TL. Since TL was originally written with the Bell companies in mind (SBC, Verizon, etc.), much of the wording was refers to the customer as the organization. The TL standard is written from the customer's perspective rather than the organization's (anyone seeking registration) perspective. There really is a need for QuEST to update all the wording in TL 9000 to be consistent with ISO 9K2K wording and definitions. Fortunately we have measures in place to ensure our own business continuity and offer related services to our customers. So, we were covered either way.Jaime
|
Jaime,
ISO 9000 series is the foundation for TL9000 standards. TL9000 cannot have separate definition for “organization”. It is same as ISO 9000, Organization means your “organization”. Not SBC, or Bell or Verizon.
TL clause 7.1.C.3 – It is your organization that should have disaster recovery plan in place. Your interpretation is correct. Of course , your plan to recover from the disaster ensures continuity of business with your customers.
Ref: The TL9000 Guide for Auditors, Mark Kempf, ASQ Press, Page: 32,116 The author surprisingly has referred to your own question and clarified as “your organization” and not Customer’s.
I have problem with your wording: "measures to ensure the business continuity of the CUSTOMER." Your customer may or may not continue their business after the disaster due to other reasons. However, the context here is, you were able to recover from the disaster and prove your readiness and availability to continue with the business with your customers. I would rather prefer "measures to ensure the business continuity with the CUSTOMER." Semantics??
Regards,
Govind.
Last edited by Govind; 29th September 2004 at 09:48 PM.
Reason: additional page# reference added
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|