Here are some thoughts on training and how it relates to driving customer focus in organizations. It is entitled, "The Top 10 Training Topics for Customer Focus." This piece is part of a book I'm writing on customer focus. As always, I would love to hear what you think about it, positive and negative.
Craig
__________________
Craig Cochran
Georgia Institute of Technology
As I came to the end I found that I had to reread everything after Topic #8. I just couldn't stop thinking of different "ethical" issues I've run across throughout my working career and how I've learned to handle different situations (although I still have the "insert foot......" syndrome occasionally).
Nice job
__________________ There is no psychiatrist in the world like a puppy licking your face. - Ben Williams
Thanks a lot for your feedback. Ethics seems to be one of those training topics that only sees the light of day when there's a crisis--not when everything is fine. Of course, there might not ever be a crisis if ethics was a normal issue that was regularly discussed and trained on.
Can you think of any other training topics that could help drive customer focus?
Craig
__________________
Craig Cochran
Georgia Institute of Technology
One thing that I deal with on an almost daily basis revolves around "good enough". For instance - An operator/inspector will identify something as out of specification "by a pinch". The cell technician or manager will sign off the NCM ticket as "OK to process" and ship parts. The reasoning, many times, is that "it won't affect the fit/function or the customer's process and they won't even be aware of it. We'll fix it later". 9 times out of 10 that may be true but....! While I fully understand that our economics come in to play, the attitude just doesn't sit right with me most of the time. My biggest issue with it pertains to the message we send to the operator/inspector. When it happens too often (without following topic #4 - Effective Communication) they begin to continuously "fudge" numbers because "it doesn't matter". Perhaps this is already "implied" in one or more of the topics but it doesn't jump out at me.
Just a minor "vent" - One other thing we are ridiculously good at is "blamestorming". I realize this ties in to Topic #6 (Root Cause Analysis) but I just laugh to myself as in each instance it seems we try to find out who to "write up" as a first step. I am so tired of sitting in on problem solving meetings and spending the first half of the meeting trying to determine who messed up.
__________________ There is no psychiatrist in the world like a puppy licking your face. - Ben Williams
Thanks a lot for your feedback. Ethics seems to be one of those training topics that only sees the light of day when there's a crisis--not when everything is fine. Of course, there might not ever be a crisis if ethics was a normal issue that was regularly discussed and trained on.
Can you think of any other training topics that could help drive customer focus?
Craig
Craig:
While it makes sense to seperate these topics as you did, I think it is important to emphasize, maybe at the end of the piece, that each skill is a subset of the "serve the customer" whole.
For instance, communication is very important, as you pointed out. Document control is a part of the communications picture. Communicate a lie, and the effectiveness of all communications is reduced. So, in a way, these issues are interrelated.
Also, there might be some people who will say that EVERY company exists to make a profit. That may be true, but every PERSON within that company is not necessarily there to make a profit (unless a paycheck counts as profit). Most, if not all, have an impact on customer service in some way, and that impact surely had an influence on the creation of their position in the first place.
Once again, a very good piece, with some interesting views. Good job!!
I had never heard the term "blamestorming" before, but I think I've participated in a few of those sessions in the past! How to break out of that is the big question. If your organization has a defined problem solving method, maybe it could be revised to include a specific step of "focus on the problem, not the people." I'm a huge proponent of simple step-by-step problem solving methods that enable teams to focus on the problem and its true causes, instead of on the supposed "people who screwed up." Your discussion of 'good enough' is right on the money.
Craig,
Great point. I need to bring the whole article back around to the fact that all the training topics are intermeshed and inseparable from one another. The all must be integrated for any of them to work well. And your point about everyone not being there to make a profit is correct. Ultimately, the combined actions of everyone converge in such a way that the organization realizes a profit. Individually, people's jobs often have nothing whatsoever to do with net income in the micro sense. It's the accumulated efforts of everyone that gets the job done. Excellent commentary, CH.
Talk to you soon,
Craig
__________________
Craig Cochran
Georgia Institute of Technology
Craig, I found the article to be well thought and well written. I do however have concerns with Time Management. A lot of folks wear more then one hat now a days and trying to prepare the next day in advanced would be a difficult situation. We just don't know what the next day will bring. its kind of like fortelling the future.
For example, I have several task that I must perform on a daily basis, providing an event happens! One of my tasks would be to write ECR's (engineering change request). The number of ECR's I write in a single day varies from zero to ten or more (sometimes takes up the whole day). The same goes for the number of NCR's (nonconformance reports), which i also write. How do you plan ahead with these kind of tasks?
How about the "Top Nine..." as title? or can you give Time Management a little more thought and revise it?
I especially like the training for Root Cause Analysis and the Mission and Stradegy. Of the two I think the Mission and stradegy would be the most beneficial.
I think most of us have time management problems. Even though I know how to handle them on a theoretic basis, I still have emotional issues dealing with priorities. The toughest part is avoiding "overbooking your time."
The major downside is the feeling of failure when you are unable to complete everything on your "to do" list.
This is definitely a case of "Do as I say, not as I do."
To achieve real satisfaction in our lives, we have to be VERY realistic in scheduling our time. Often this means saying, "NO!" to requests and claims on our time. If we decide to change priorities in midstream, we have to realize that some things from the original list will fall to the wayside.
There was a time in my life when I put in 80 and 100 hour workweeks, but I was more than adequately compensated (or so I thought then.) In retrospect, I traded family and friends for money and prestige, but I had created a little "fiction" that I was earning the money for them.
Ultimately, each of us makes decisions about priorities. We only hope we have sufficient information to make the correct decision.
__________________ "Few minds wear out; more rust out"
Inscribed over the entrance of Louis Pasteur School, Chicago
Christian Nestell Bovee (1820-1904) in Thoughts, Feelings and Fancies, 1857