mmkraftwerk
Registered
Good morning friends,
My department has recently started a lab for flammability testing. Among other issues getting it started, I'm conflicted on what to do with the calibration/certification of our oven for heat treatment for OEM specific (FMVSS 302 Compliant) testing that require a specified amount of time in a scientific oven, before commencing the flammability testing. My boss is of the opinion that instead of certifying the thermocouple in the oven, that we should just purchase a scientific thermometer/thermocouple to verify it against, my worry is that this isn't going to hold up in an IATF audit. Her concern is more related to cost save rather than what is best practice. I think a record of verification of the thermocouple with a secondary NIST traceable unit would be good, but I don't think it would replace an annual calibration/certification of the oven thermocouple itself.
Can anyone here provide some guidance on what a good practice would be?
My department has recently started a lab for flammability testing. Among other issues getting it started, I'm conflicted on what to do with the calibration/certification of our oven for heat treatment for OEM specific (FMVSS 302 Compliant) testing that require a specified amount of time in a scientific oven, before commencing the flammability testing. My boss is of the opinion that instead of certifying the thermocouple in the oven, that we should just purchase a scientific thermometer/thermocouple to verify it against, my worry is that this isn't going to hold up in an IATF audit. Her concern is more related to cost save rather than what is best practice. I think a record of verification of the thermocouple with a secondary NIST traceable unit would be good, but I don't think it would replace an annual calibration/certification of the oven thermocouple itself.
Can anyone here provide some guidance on what a good practice would be?