SAMPLE COMPANY                                        Page 1 of 2
SOP # 01-1  Revision: 0                Prepared by:             _
Effective Date:                        Approved by:             _


Title:         MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY AND REVIEWS

Policy:   Upper management is responsible for the organization of
          personnel to satisfy the requirements of the company's
          quality system and for appropriately reviewing the
          quality system for deficiencies and improvements.

Purpose:  To outline the methods for ensuring that the
          responsibility, authority and interrelation of all
          personnel who manage, perform, and verify work
          affecting quality is defined and how the quality system
          is to be reviewed to ensure its continuing suitability
          and effectiveness.

Scope:    This procedures applies to the President, Quality
          Assurance Manager (QA Manager) and all department
          managers involved with the company's quality system.


Procedures:


1.0  Organization

1.1  The QA Manager will semi-annually review the company's
     organization chart and any changes to job descriptions for
     personnel in engineering and operations to ensure that the
     company's organization adequately meets the objectives of
     the quality system.



2.0  Management Reviews

2.1  Within the first two months of each year, QA Manager will
     coordinate a meeting to be attended by the President, QA
     Manager and all Operation Managers to review, discuss and
     propose any necessary changes to the quality system.

     Notes of this meeting will be taken by the QA Manager and
     filed in accordance with the quality records.





MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY AND REVIEWS                 Page 2 of 2



2.2  At the meeting the following areas/topics for the prior year
     are to be reviewed:

     - internal quality assurance audit reports.
     - trend analysis of customer complaints or defective product
                                                            s/com
                                                            ponen
                                                            ts.
     - results of corrective actions taken.
     - cost of quality considerations.

2.3  Upon conclusion of the above discussion, the management team
     will review the quality system for its effectiveness and
     adequacy.  The President and Quality Assurance Manager will
     then direct and implement any changes deemed necessary to
     the system.