SAMPLE COMPANY Page 1 of 8 SOP # 04-1 Revision: 0 Prepared by: _ Effective Date: Approved by: _ Title: PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Policy: The design phase is the most important phase in the life cycle of a product. The inherent quality, effectiveness, safety and customer satisfaction of a product are established during this phase. No matter how carefully a product may be manufactured or how perfect the quality control program, these inherent qualities cannot be improved except through design enhancement. Therefore, it is crucial that adequate planning and controls be established, implemented and maintained during the design phase to assure that the quality, effectiveness, safety and customer satisfaction of a product are optimally enhanced prior to manufacturing. Achieving these intrinsic qualities are a direct function of: a. Awareness of the design goal by management, engineering, production and quality assurance. b. Correct selection and application of parts and materials. c. Performance of normal and worst-case testing to evaluate and assure that the product design and manufacturing processes will perform as intended under all reasonable circumstances. d. Thorough review and analysis of the product design. Further, product developments should be managed in such a way to assure timely development of new products in order to reach completion quickly and capitalize on market opportunities. Purpose: To outline the steps for the planning, development and review of new products. Scope: This statements applies to all new product developments and significant changes to existing products. PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Page 2 of 8 Definitions: 1) Failure Mode and Effects Analysis - Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is an evaluation technique for testing the design of products in which failures are assumed to occur. FMEA is useful for evaluating reliability, safety and general quality where, for example, the evaluator assumes that: - each component fails; - each subsystem or subassembly fails; - the operator makes errors; and - the power source is interrupted and immediately restarted. The probability of each failure actually occurring and, if it does, the resulting effect are analyzed. Then, where needed and feasible, hazards and faulty performance are designed out of the device; or compensated or prevented/reduced by interlocks, warning signs, explicit instructions, alarms, etc. Risks cannot always be removed from products, but they should be known and controlled to the extent feasible with existing technology. FMEA is a very powerful and cost-effective product design evaluation technique. It takes very little time to "assume" that a component or subsystem is going to fail versus the actual time required to test to reach failure. 2) Fault Tree Analysis - Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) is a deductive, top-down approach to failure mode analysis. First, a system failure or safety hazard is assumed. Next, through the use of detailed logic diagrams, basic component failures or events are identified that could cause the assumed system failure or safety hazard. Once identified, computational techniques are used to analyze the basic defects, determine failure probabilities and establish severity of effect. 3) Failure Mode Effects Criticality Analysis - Failure Mode Effects Criticality Analysis (FMECA) is an inductive, bottom- up process which assumes basic defects at the component level and then determines the effects on higher levels of assembly. Failure modes are analytically induced into each component and failure effects are evaluated and noted, including severity and probability of occurrence. FMECA can be performed using either actual failure data derived from field failures or hypothesized failure modes derived from design analysis or other sources. In addition to providing information about failure cause and effect, FMECA provides a structured method for proceeding component-by-component through the system to assess failure effects. PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Page 3 of 8 Procedures: 1.0 New Product Initiation 1.1 All personnel in the Company are encouraged to be involved in product and process improvement. To facilitate this process and to allow management to determine and initiate viable product development projects. a Request for Engineering Action (REA) form should be completed for all ideas. The REA form should be completed by the originator with as much detail as necessary to adequately describe the reasons for the request and proposed recommendations. Additional documentation can be attached to provide increased clarity or further information. The REA will then be forwarded to Engineering where a sequential REA # will be assigned for tracking purposes. 1.2 Marketing and Engineering will be responsible for informally evaluating an initial market viability and technical feasibility for the new idea based upon their experience and intuitive assessments. Marketing will proceed with ideas deemed potentially viable by preparing a market analysis and product brief. The marketing analysis should include: a. Determining the need for the product or service. b. Accurately defined market demand and sector including determination of the grade, quantity, price and timing estimates for the product or service. c. Determining customer requirements through contract review or market needs including an assessment of any unstated expectations or biases held by customers. Marketing will then communicate the customer and product/service requirements by preparing a documented product brief. The product brief helps translate customer requirements and expectations into a preliminary set of specifications as the basis for subsequent design work and analysis. The following items can be included in the product brief: a. performance characteristics (e.g. environmental and usage conditions and reliability). b. aesthetic or sensory characteristics (e.g. style, appearance, shape, color, taste, smell). c. installation configuration or fit. d. packaging. e. applicable standards and statutory regulations. f. quality assurance/verification. PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Page 4 of 8 1.3 Upon completion of the market analysis and product brief, executive management in conjunction with marketing and engineering will thoroughly evaluate the product or service idea for individual viability and in comparison to any other product or service ideas the company is contemplating. This process serves to selectively qualify ideas in order to allocate financial and personnel resources and prioritize projects. This evaluation should include technical, financial and marketing assessments such as technical feasibility, investment cost, producibility, serviceability, profitability, payback, market trends, product life cycle, durability, competition, pricing, distribution, installation and service requirements, legality and liability. Management will then initiate a decision to begin development of the product idea. However, the product development process will be monitored on a continuous basis in regard to the above criteria and specifically for technical problems or changing market conditions. All projects will be required to continually pass a viability assessment regardless of the amount of time or investment incurred. 2.0 Design Planning 2.1 A Product Manager will then be assigned to oversee the planning and development of the product. The Product Manager will form a specification and design team which will include representation from engineering, manufacturing and service. The function of this team will be to translate customer needs from the product brief into technical specifications for materials, products and processes. The goal is to provide a product that provides customer satisfaction at an acceptable price that enables a satisfactory return on investment for the company and ensures that the product is producible, verifiable and controllable under the proposed production, installation, operating and servicing conditions. 3.0 Product Development 3.1 The Product Manager and the design team will then prepare a product development plan with specific details for each design and development activity or phase. Whenever possible, the development plan should be divided into modules which can be worked on simultaneously by different design teams in order to accelerate the process with a quicker completion and market introduction date. PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Page 5 of 8 Each activity will identify responsibility (Internal or Outside Firm), description of the activity and the time frame for accomplishment. The description of the design activity should provide clear and definitive technical data for procurement, the execution of work and verification of conformance of the product development to specification requirements. The time frames established for each activity should provide interim development checkpoints appropriate to the nature of the product. The checkpoints at which design reviews or evaluations will take place may depend upon the product's application, its design complexity, the extent of innovation and technology being introduced, the degree of standardization, and similarity with proven designs. Upon approval of the product development plan, each team will be given adequate authority to take actions for accomplishment of their phase without repeated approval processes. Product development is a sequence of decisions. Shortening decision-making time can dramatically speed product development. Yet, each team will be responsible for ensuring adherence to the above quality and coordinated development program with adequate communication at all times. Organizational and technical interfaces between different groups shall be maintained and the necessary information documented, transmitted and regularly reviewed. 3.2 During development of prototypes, the design team will continually review customer requirements. In addition, consideration should be given to the requirements for safety, environmental and other regulations. The quality aspects of the design should be unambiguous and adequately define characteristics important to quality, such as acceptance and rejection criteria. Both fitness for purpose and safeguards against misuse should be considered. Product definition may also include reliability, maintainability and serviceability through a reasonable life expectancy. Changes made to the specifications during the development process, that are accepted as design changes, will be documented and evaluated to assure that they accomplish the intended result and do not compromise the effectiveness or safety. 3.3 The design teams will be responsible for assuring that all parts and materials used in product designs have the reliability necessary to achieve their intended purposes. For some parts and materials, this assessment can be done in- house, while for others it may be necessary to contract with suppliers or outside test labs. The reliability goal should be based on the severity of use and importance of the parts or materials function. The assessment should encompass the selection, PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Page 6 of 8 specification, qualification and ongoing verification of parts and materials quality, whether fabricated in-house or provided by vendors. Parts and materials quality assurance should include qualification of suppliers to aid in assuring only quality parts and materials are used. Parts and materials should be selected on the basis of their suitability for the chosen application, compatibility with other parts and materials and the environment, and proven reliability. Conservative choices in selection of parts and materials are characteristic of reliable products. Standard proven parts and materials should be used as much as possible in lieu of unproven parts and materials. A preferred parts and materials list should be established as a bill of materials during the preliminary design stage and refined as the design progresses. This list should include approved suppliers for the parts and materials. 4.0 Product Testing and Qualification 4.1 Methods should be specified for testing and measurement and the acceptance criteria applied to evaluate the product design during both the development and production phases. Parameters should include the following: a. Performance target values, tolerances and attribute features. b. Acceptance and rejection criteria. c. Test and measurement methods, equipment, bias and precision requirements. 4.2 Periodic evaluation of the design should be performed at significant stages. Such evaluation can take the form of analytical methods, such as FMEA, FTA or FMECA. Evaluation should include inspection and/or testing of prototype models and/or actual production samples. The amount and degree of testing should be related to the risks identified in the design planning phase. The tests should include the following activities: a. Evaluation of performance, durability, safety, reliability and maintainability under expected storage and operational conditions. b. Inspections to verify that all design features are as intended and that all authorized design changes have been accomplished and recorded. c. Validation of computer systems and software. PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Page 7 of 8 The results of all tests and evaluations should be documented regularly throughout the qualification test cycle. Review of test results should include defect and failure analysis. 5.0 Design Review and Verification 5.1 At the completion of each phase of design development, a formal, documented, systematic and critical review of the design results should be performed. Reviews should be objective, unbiased examinations by appropriately trained personnel which include individuals other than those responsible for the design. For example, design review should be conducted by representatives of Manufacturing, Quality Assurance, Engineering, Marketing, Service and Purchasing as well as the actual design team. The design review should identify and anticipate problem areas and inadequacies, and initiate corrective actions to ensure that the final design and supporting data meet customer requirements. A design review checklist should be constructed as appropriate for the product design with the review consisting of an evaluation of the design to assure that each checklist item was adequately addressed. The following are items that could be included in a checklist: - Physical characteristics, constraints and aesthetic specifications; - Safety needs of the user, environmental compatibility, need for failsafe characteristics; - Considerations of unintended uses and misuses; - Compliance with regulatory requirements and national and international standards; - Labeling, including warnings, identification and traceability, operating and maintenance instructions; - Packaging, handling, shelf-life, storage and stability requirements; - Product installability, reliability, serviceability and maintainability requirements; - Producibility of the design, assembly requirements including any special processes such as mechanization, automation and installation of components; - Selection of materials, components and sub- assemblies, including approved suppliers and availability; - Review and use of standard parts; - Capability to inspect and test the product, including special inspection and test requirements; - Failure Mode Effects Analysis; and - Acceptance criteria and permissible maximum and minimum tolerances. PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Page 8 of 8 5.2 Review results should be well documented in report form and signed by designated individuals as complete and accurate. All changes made as a result of review findings should be documented. Reports should include conclusions and recommended follow-up and should be disseminated in a timely manner to appropriate organizational functions, including management.