|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums |
|
|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums |
|
 The Old Elsmar Cove Forums
 QS-9000
 Facilities and Tooling Mgt. 4.2.6
|
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Facilities and Tooling Mgt. 4.2.6 |
|
Lyndon Diong Forum Contributor Posts: 21 |
posted 29 December 1998 05:09 AM
   
How do we evaluate the effectiveness of existing operations and processes? I am not aware of the methods that are available. Thanks IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
posted 03 January 1999 08:28 PM
You start off by showing evidence of your planning throughout the APQP process. To comply with "...evaluating the efectiveness of existing operations and processes..." you look to various 'control' systems. Tracking of output is one. Tracking scrap is another. Look to measureables your company or facility has established to monitor trends and problems. You are constantly (well, to some degree) evaluating what's happening. This is linked to continuous improvement where you are 'constantly' looking at measureables and operations and products and seeking ways to improve the product and processes. So - look to your measureables and see what you have. Remember there will be different departments contributing. Manufacturing, of course, will have certain measurables. Materials will probably answer questions about "...storage and buffer inventory levels..." Let us know what you do. Any others have some help / ideas for compliance here? IP: Logged |
|
Roger Eastin Forum Wizard Posts: 345 |
posted 04 January 1999 09:21 AM
I think this evaluation also includes some "classical" IE stuff such as ergonomic considerations, optimized product flow through the process, etc. IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
posted 05 January 1999 02:52 AM
Yes, Roger, you are correct. On the other hand: quote: But how does one evaluate ergonomic issues? For example I believe it is Honda which considers more than 4 moves per assembler as potentially problematic but I have no idea how to evaluate this. Any ideas? IP: Logged |
|
Roger Eastin Forum Wizard Posts: 345 |
posted 05 January 1999 08:15 AM
I am no Frederick Taylor, but I think there are standard metrics for optimizing (minimizing)the number of moves per operator. Also, there are work flow metrics which focus on product flow effectiveness. I think these are standard IE metrics, but I'm sure there are some budding IE's out there who could steer me straight! IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
posted 06 January 1999 07:54 PM
I guess the question here is how far a company has to go. I find it hard to believe, for example, that 50% of the companies out there do 'significant' ergonomic studies and I'll bet even less do monitoring for evidence of EFFECTIVENESS. Do any of you do anything like this (tracking and evaluation for effectiveness of ergonimics)? IP: Logged |
|
wanida Lurker (<10 Posts) Posts: 8 |
posted 18 September 1999 09:39 AM
Could it be possible to monitor through the development and plan to reduce injury, pain, and/or operator leave caused by ergonomic matter? The effectiveness might be evaluate through the success of plan. IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
posted 19 September 1999 03:04 PM
The question becomes what metrics you use - but sounds good to me. IP: Logged |
|
Sam Forum Contributor Posts: 244 |
posted 20 September 1999 06:40 AM
The "Toyota Production System" philosophy has helped me a lot in this element of QS9000. Also, Arvin Industries is a great company to benchmark. They can be found on the Internet.They have implemented a system called "ATQPS". IP: Logged |
|
wanida Lurker (<10 Posts) Posts: 8 |
posted 20 September 1999 11:02 AM
Sam Could you please give us the web site/address of Arvin or the TOYOTA PRODUCTION SYSTEM you mentioned. This could be very helpful. IP: Logged |
|
Sam Forum Contributor Posts: 244 |
posted 20 September 1999 12:17 PM
For Arvin: Use search and type in Arvin Industries, then find the section for ATQPS. The same for TPS you might also type in "Kanban" for more info. A good ref. book is "KanbanJust-in-Time at Toyota" by productivity press 503-235-0600. I would recommend benchmarking Arvin, they have an excellent system and they are also QS-9000 registered. IP: Logged |
All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
  |
|
Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!
UBB 5.45c
Main Site Search 
