|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums |
|
The Old Elsmar Cove Forums
![]() Statistical Techniques and 6 Sigma
![]() Six Sigma
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Six Sigma |
|
Mike525 Forum Contributor Posts: 49 |
Marc: Didn't know where else to place this subject, so I put it in a high visibility folder. Is anyone interested in starting a thread on this subject? Seems every where I look, I see mention of six sigma and black belts. What is this program, where can I get GOOD information on it (without paying a small fortune), and what the hell is a six sigma black belt. Does anyone know what the tools of six sigma are? Is this a QMS or "just a problem solving methodology?" IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
Ummm, well, I'd start a thread in the Statistical Techniques forum. In fact, I'll move this thread there. I'm not a six sigma guru. I understand the concept, but there is 'disagreement' as to whether the 'theoretical 1.5 sigma shift is 'real'. IP: Logged |
|
Don Winton Forum Contributor Posts: 498 |
Yea, I am not up on this six-sigma stuff either. But, I do believe the Black Belt term is given to persons who complete some six-sigma school. But, I could be wrong. IP: Logged |
|
Don Winton Forum Contributor Posts: 498 |
-------Begin Snip------- Six Sigma Secrets Applied in its broadest sense, Six Sigma methodology is improving AlliedSignal's product-development process. -------End Snip------- Regards IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
I didn't realize 6 sigma is used in the design phase. I'm gonna have to re-read some of my old documentation. IP: Logged |
|
Don Winton Forum Contributor Posts: 498 |
Yea, Marc. That is what I found interesting as well. The current Minitab newsletter has a pretty good article as well. It can be found at: http://www.minitab.com/resources/KeepingTAB/kt31/KT31.pdf Regards IP: Logged |
|
Brian Dowsett Forum Contributor Posts: 35 |
In answer to the earlier question regarding what is a blackbelt. My blackbelt training involved 5 weeks of fulltime training spaced out over 5 months, with project work in between. The subject matter was in the use of a variety of Quality tools but linked to a set methodology for process improvement. Certification was by submission of the project. Teaching was done by our own master blackbelts, who I believe are certified by the six sigma corporation. Having been through similar training in another company, I'd say the difference here is a)That the project had to be real and had to deliver improvements in order for the candidate to be certified b) That in this organisation the six sigma philosophy comes from the top down, so you are more likely to get the backing and encouragement to get things done. I know there have been criticism elsewhere of some of the stats at the heart of the 6 sigma training, but i'd argue that the numbers don't matter that much, as long as the majority of people in an organisation are committed to improvement and are judged by the same criteria. Brian IP: Logged |
|
Don Winton Forum Contributor Posts: 498 |
I recently converted an Air Force paper I had into PDF format. To download it, click *** Dead Link Removed *** [This message has been edited by Don Winton (edited 27 December 1999).] IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
Good paper. IP: Logged |
|
Don Winton Forum Contributor Posts: 498 |
Thanks. I recently downloaded a neat utility called 'PrintToPDF' (MAC if you are interested) but was wondering if it was working OK ($20.00 I think. Much cheaper than Adobe). If anyone has problems reading it, let me know. I am still a newbie. Regards IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
Reads fine to me. I have the Acrobat full program - don't have hte reader to try it with. IP: Logged |
|
Mike525 Forum Contributor Posts: 49 |
Don: Excellent paper - I've done a little research on my own regarding six Sigma - from what I've read it sounds like a very viable program - and certification is based on actual results - however, I believe like any other program it is a tool to be used to achieve reuslts, and is only as good as the individual using it. IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
Also see http://Elsmar.com/ubb/Forum10/HTML/000014.html IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
Also see: http://Elsmar.com/ubb/Forum10/HTML/000000.html IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
Also see: http://Elsmar.com/ubb/Forum10/HTML/000014.html and http://Elsmar.com/ubb/Forum10/HTML/000102.html IP: Logged |
|
johno unregistered |
I've not attended any formal classes on the subject but the few texts and papers that I've looked thru seem to use the same assumptions that almost everyone else does, and that is to use population parameters instead of sample statistics. If using say a 30 piece sample and only having a sample mean and sample standard deviation it's tough to make statements about 3.4 ppm at any reasonable level of confidence without resorting to large intervals. The 1.5 sigma meanshift is just an assumption, and either you buy it or you don't. It's a better assumption than no meanshift, which is what a lot (most ?) seem to use when something like statistical tolerancing. The 1.5 sigma meanshift wasn't conservative enough for a lot of our processes so we used uniform distribution assumptions. IP: Logged |
|
Steven Truchon Forum Contributor Posts: 89 |
One of our major customers and current "driver" of our Six Sigma program taught us that the belt color is in direct reference to what percentage of your worktime is dedicated to the Six Sigma function or projects. A black belt was at 100% (fulltime) and a green belt was at 10 or 20% and the other colors were somewhere in between. That is from one of the makers of Tim-the-ToolMan-Taylor handtools and small kitchen apppliances.
quote: IP: Logged |
All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() | |
Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!
