|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums |
|
|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums |
|
 The Old Elsmar Cove Forums
 APQP and PPAP
 re-PPAP for "inactive" tooling
|
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: re-PPAP for "inactive" tooling |
|
Ken Mraz Lurker (<10 Posts) Posts: 1 |
posted 29 September 1999 11:35 AM
  
Per the PPAP manual, submission is required when "Product is re-released after the tooling has been inactive for volume production for 12 months or more." I have yet to contact our registrar for his interpretation. We are struggling whether this means if NO production was run for 12 months or if re-PPAP applies only IF our customer designates the tool as inactive AND 12 months of no production go by. We,internally, take steps to check tooling if it sits idle for a year, but have not been re-submitting PPAPs to our customers. Any similar interpretations out there? IP: Logged |
|
patricia unregistered |
posted 20 December 1999 08:14 AM
In the past, we have completed a PPAP package and kept it on file to show whomever asked for it. That way, your company knows the product you are running is OK and when the customer or registrar ask about it you can produce the document. IP: Logged |
|
admin Cheech Wizard Posts: 46 |
posted 20 December 1999 08:17 AM
Thanks for answering this, Pat. It's one we missed and I hate missing a question entirely as I did this one! My apologies to Ken. Anyone else with advice here? IP: Logged |
All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
  |
|
Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!
UBB 5.45c
Main Site Search 
