|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums |
|
The Old Elsmar Cove Forums
![]() FDA and Medical Devices
![]() Classification rules for Canada
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Classification rules for Canada |
|
Mike Forum Contributor Posts: 13 |
Our company submitted application for device licences with Health Canada for Electrosurgical and Cryosurgical Equipment(Class 2 - Reg.#884.4120 & 878.4350) CANADA did not accept our product for review as Class 2 and classified devices as Class 3. I was under impression that Canada and USA use harmonized codes... IP: Logged |
|
Kevin Mader Forum Wizard Posts: 575 |
Don or Marc. Are you out there? This one is beyond me. IP: Logged |
|
Don Winton Forum Contributor Posts: 498 |
Yea Kevin, I'm here. This is a new one on me as well. I will look into it and advise further, regardless of what I find. Regards, IP: Logged |
|
Mike Forum Contributor Posts: 13 |
Don @ Kevin, thanks for your help. I have the standard for Canada. I am not sure, that they fully know or understand it. What can be other reason for classification of non-invasive deveces as invasive???? I think this is all about money. The base fee for Class 2 application is $200(canadian) Total for 1 device review - $2,420 We have 20 different devices in Cryofamily, so if we go thru with this,- it will cost more than $48K for this application!!!! IP: Logged |
|
Don Winton Forum Contributor Posts: 498 |
Mike, I could not find the answer to your specific question last night, but this is what I did find. FDA product codes and classifications can be found at http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/prodcode.html From that location, I was able to determine that the regulations you quoted are indeed FDA Class II devices: Device: ELECTROCAUTERY, GYNECOLOGIC (AND ACCESSORIES) Device: SYSTEM, CRYOSURGICAL, LIQUID NITROGEN, FOR UROLOGY Device: UNIT, CRYOSURGICAL, ACCESSORIES After review of the Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF) members, I found these from Canada: Mr. Kim Dix Mr. Kevin Murray Perhaps they may be able to address your specific question. The GHTF site is at http://www.ghtf.org/default.htm . I was not able to find a document that specifically stated that FDA and Health and Welfare Canada had agreed upon harmonized standards. I then went to this site http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/ which led me to the International agreements site at http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/htmleng/intagree.html . There were not any documents there either related to harmonization, but it was getting late and I was tired. Hope the above information is useful. Regards, [This message has been edited by Don Winton (edited 03-24-99).] IP: Logged |
|
Monica Lewis Forum Contributor Posts: 19 |
Hi Mike, That was an interesting topic.Check out the classification rules according to Medical Device Directive at http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg03/directs/dg3d/d2/meddev/md/dirmd/annex9.htm I know that this will not help you to get registrated in canada, but the issue about classification is a hot subject. Regards IP: Logged |
|
Mike Forum Contributor Posts: 13 |
Hi Don & Monica, Thank you for your useful information. In addition, I will try to call members of Global Harmonization Task Force... I will keep you inform. Regards, IP: Logged |
|
Mike Forum Contributor Posts: 13 |
Don, Kevin, Monica I'm happy to report that after 15 min. of sparring with Dr. Freelan (director of Therapeutic Products Programme, Health Canada), we addressed this issue. We got Class 2, however, the real news that Canada classification system a little different from FDA and ISO/CE standards. If someone have any questions, please contact me. Regards, IP: Logged |
|
Don Winton Forum Contributor Posts: 498 |
Congrats on your success. I will keep your offer in mind and do stop in often. Regards, [This message has been edited by Don Winton (edited 03-27-99).] IP: Logged |
All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!
